IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/356940.html

Profiling of Chinese Mitten Crab Farmers in the Jiangsu Province of China

Author

Listed:
  • Agbekpornu, Hayford
  • Yuan, Xinhua
  • Zhang, Zongli
  • Zhu, Weifan

Abstract

Profiling of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) farmers is relevant for policy development and successful implementation of projects. Few studies have been undertaken in this area of research. The object of this study is to profile farmers involved in the production of Eriocheir sinensis farming in Jiangsu province, China. Data were collected using structured questionnaire. Results show that most farmers have attained basic education. The average age of farmers is about 57 years. The main occupation of most of them is fish farming. The average number of household labour involved in mitten crab farming is 2, working 8 hours/day. Casual labour works for 8 hours and is paid about CNY 110.00/day while permanent labour is paid an average of CNY 3,500.00/month. Most farmers have 6-10 years’ farming experience; majority are involved in polyculture with shrimp as the major species mix with mitten crab. A greater number of farmers depends on their own savings for farming and operate between1-10 ha. Most farms are not insured against risks and disasters. A large number of farmers benefit from various training to enhance their capacities. It is therefore essential that authorities consider the socio-economic characteristics of mitten crab farmers for policy drive to help develop programmes and projects for successful implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Agbekpornu, Hayford & Yuan, Xinhua & Zhang, Zongli & Zhu, Weifan, 2018. "Profiling of Chinese Mitten Crab Farmers in the Jiangsu Province of China," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 26(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:356940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356940/files/Agbekpornu2622018AJAEES42156.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coelli, Tim & Fleming, Euan, 2004. "Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixed food and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 229-239, December.
    2. Gershon Feder & Roger Slade, 1985. "The Role of Public Policy in the Diffusion of Improved Agricultural Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(2), pages 423-428.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Solís & Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta & Ricardo E. Quiroga, 2009. "Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 202-219, February.
    2. Markose Chekol Zewdie & Michele Moretti & Daregot Berihun Tenessa & Zemen Ayalew Ayele & Jan Nyssen & Enyew Adgo Tsegaye & Amare Sewnet Minale & Steven Van Passel, 2021. "Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2018. "Productivity and efficiency in high-potential areas," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 7, pages 149-180, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Edeh, Hyacinth O., 2020. "Effects of agricultural mechanization on economies of scope in crop production in Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Yang, Dan & Liu, Zimin, 2012. "Does farmer economic organization and agricultural specialization improve rural income? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 990-993.
    6. Asfaw, Solomon & Cattaneo, Andrea & Pallante, Giacomo & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Improving the efficiency targeting of Malawi's farm input subsidy programme: Big pain, small gain?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 104-118.
    7. Nguyen, Huy Quynh, 2017. "Analyzing the economies of crop diversification in rural Vietnam using an input distance function," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 148-156.
    8. Mekhora, Thamrong & Fleming, Euan M., 2004. "An Analysis of Scope Economies and Specialisation Efficiencies Among Thai Shrimp and Rice Smallholders," Working Papers 12914, University of New England, School of Economics.
    9. Kassie, Menale & Shiferaw, Bekele & Muricho, Geoffrey, 2011. "Agricultural Technology, Crop Income, and Poverty Alleviation in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1784-1795.
    10. Singbo, Alphonse G. & Emvalomatis, Grigorios & Alfons, Oude Lansink, 2013. "Assessing the impact of crop specialization on farms’ performance in vegetables farming in Benin: a non-neutral stochastic frontier approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149172, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Kibrom A. Abay & Tesfamicheal Wossen & Jordan Chamberlin, 2023. "Mismeasurement and efficiency estimates: Evidence from smallholder survey data in Africa," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 413-434, June.
    12. Ioannis Skevas & Grigorios Emvalomatis & Bernhard Brümmer, 2018. "The effect of farm characteristics on the persistence of technical inefficiency: a case study in German dairy farming," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(1), pages 3-25.
    13. Samal, Parshuram & Pandey, Sushil & Kumar, G.A.K. & Barah, B.C., 2011. "Rice Ecosystems and Factors Affecting Varietal Adoption in Rainfed Coastal Orissa: A Multivariate Probit Analysis," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 24(01), June.
    14. Villano, Renato A. & Fleming, Pauline & Fleming, Euan M., 2008. "Evidence of Scope Economies in Australian Agriculture," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 5996, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Bouali Guesmi & Ahmed Yangui & Ibtissem Taghouti & José Maria Gil, 2022. "Trade-Off between Land Use Pattern and Technical Efficiency Performance: Evidence from Arable Crop Farming in Tunisia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Urbina, Jilber, 2017. "Eficiencia técnica en la producción de café en Nicaragua: Un análisis de fronteras estocásticas [Technical efficiency in coffee production: a stochastic frontier analysis for Nicaragua]," MPRA Paper 82690, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2017.
    17. Muhammad Khan, "undated". "The Health Burden of Dust Pollution in the Textile Industry of Faisalabad, Pakistan," Working papers 119, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    18. Longang, Saubaber Gamo & D., Soh Wenda Boris. & Bergaly, Kamdem Cyrile, 2023. "Adoption of Cocoa Certification Scheme and Farmer’s Technical Efficiency in Cameroon: A Double Bootstrap Procedure," AfricArxiv 2r7qa, Center for Open Science.
    19. Jorge Andr√©s Perdomo & Darrell Hueth, 2010. "Funciones de producci√≥n y eficiencia t√©cnica en el eje cafetero colombiano: una aproximaci√≥n con frontera estoc√°stica," Documentos CEDE 7606, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    20. Sanzidur Rahman & Basanta Kumar Barmon, 2018. "Total Factor Energy Productivity and Efficiency Changes of the Gher (Prawn-Carp-Rice) Farming System in Bangladesh: A Stochastic Input Distance Function Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:356940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.