IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aieabj/393876.html

Rebuilding strategies for food self-sufficiency: Portugal’s past patterns and future ambitions

Author

Listed:
  • João,Alexandre Macedo
  • Freire,Dulce
  • Rocha,Humberto
  • Dias, Joana

Abstract

This study analyses Portugal’s wheat productive capacity, exploring the reasons behind its recent steady decline despite achieving self-sufficiency in the 20th century. Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), which proved to be highly effective in the development of forecasting models, the research provides valuable insights for countries facing similar challenges in defining production strategies. By employing this approach, decision-makers can improve resource allocation, ensure food security, and foster a resilient agricultural sector. The findings highlight the importance of understanding wheat production dynamics within the European Union and aligning national strategies with the Union’s goals and policies. The analysis indicates that achieving self-sufficiency is possible, supported by productivity improvements and increased cultivation areas. However, realizing significant production growth demands the adoption of sustainable strategies. This research contributes to shaping informed agricultural policies, enhancing decision-making processes, and promoting a more sustainable and efficient food production system to meet future challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • João,Alexandre Macedo & Freire,Dulce & Rocha,Humberto & Dias, Joana, 2025. "Rebuilding strategies for food self-sufficiency: Portugal’s past patterns and future ambitions," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/393876/files/W00120_51-65_04-17226-Joao.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justus Wesseler, 2022. "The EU's farm‐to‐fork strategy: An assessment from the perspective of agricultural economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1826-1843, December.
    2. Lucie Michel & David Makowski, 2013. "Comparison of Statistical Models for Analyzing Wheat Yield Time Series," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Sunding, David & Zilberman, David, 2001. "The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 207-261, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    2. Shon M. Ferguson & M. Rose Olfert, 2016. "Competitive Pressure and Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Policy Reform in Western Canada," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(2), pages 422-446.
    3. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. Ghadir Asadi & Mohammad H. Mostafavi-Dehzooei, 2022. "The Role of Learning in Adaptation to Technology: The Case of Groundwater Extraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-37, June.
    5. Anne Gobin & Inge Uljee, 2025. "European Green Deal Strategies for Agriculture in Dynamic Urbanised Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Davide Dell’Unto & Gabriele Dono & Raffaele Cortignani, 2023. "Impacts of Environmental Targets on the Livestock Sector: An Assessment Tool Applied to Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Kataria, Karin & Curtiss, Jarmila & Balmann, Alfons, "undated". "Drivers of Agricultural Physical Capital Development: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses," Working papers 122842, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    8. Petra Hýsková & Štěpán Hýsek & Vilém Jarský, 2020. "The Utilization of Crop Residues as Forest Protection: Predicting the Production of Wheat and Rapeseed Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Shadrack Kipkogei & Jiqin Han & Gershom Mwalupaso & John Tanui & Robert Brenya, 2025. "The synergistic effects of microcredit access and agricultural technology adoption on maize farmer’s income in Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Lei, Lei, 2018. "Effects of trade policy on technological innovation in agricultural markets - implications for the developing economies," IDE Discussion Papers 687, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    11. Kijima, Yoko & Otsuka, Keijiro & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2011. "An Inquiry into Constraints on a Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of NERICA Rice in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 77-86, January.
    12. Neha Kumar & Agnes Quisumbing, 2011. "Access, adoption, and diffusion: understanding the long-term impacts of improved vegetable and fish technologies in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 193-219.
    13. Surendran-Padmaja, Subash & Parlasca, Martin C. & Qaim, Matin & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2025. "Private service provision contributes to widespread innovation adoption among smallholder farmers: Laser land levelling technology in northwestern India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    14. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    15. Fang, Di & Richards, Timothy, 2016. "New Maize Variety Adoption in Mozambique: A Spatial Approach," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235388, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Ana M. Santos & Ana Soares & João Luz & Carlos Cordeiro & Marta Sousa Silva & Teresa Dias & Juliana Melo & Cristina Cruz & Luís Carvalho, 2024. "Microbial Interactions as a Sustainable Tool for Enhancing PGPR Antagonism against Phytopathogenic Fungi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Diane Charlton & Marcelo Castillo, 2021. "Potential Impacts of a Pandemic on the US Farm Labor Market," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 39-57, March.
    18. Mohanty, M. & Sinha, Nishant K. & Somasundaram, J. & McDermid, Sonali S. & Patra, Ashok K. & Singh, Muneshwar & Dwivedi, A.K. & Reddy, K. Sammi & Rao, Ch. Srinivas & Prabhakar, M. & Hati, K.M. & Jha, , 2020. "Soil carbon sequestration potential in a Vertisol in central India- results from a 43-year long-term experiment and APSIM modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 2010. "The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change in Agriculture," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 939-984, Elsevier.
    20. Ghali, Mohamed & Ben Arfa, Nejla & Justinia, Giffona & Di Bianco, Soazig & Saili, Abdul Rahman, 2026. "Adoption of digital tools in french beef cattle, pig, and vegetable farming: A mixed-methods analysis of motives, barriers, and structural determinants," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.