IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aga/esjour/v1y2017p64-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family farms in Lithuania: Problems and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jolita Greblikaite

    (Aleksandras Stulginskis University)

  • Vitalija Vanagiene

    (Aleksandras Stulginskis University)

  • Zivile Ziukaite

    (Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania)

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse the situation of family farms in Lithuania regarding essential problems and challenges. Family farming in Lithuania remains new phenomena in a period after gaining independence after the 1990s. Family farms are very important for Lithuanian rural areas as they create the main job places and income for the citizens. The need to analyse the situation about family farms in Lithuania remains on the problems disclosed in the research. It could be named as lack of legal acts concerning family business, poor managerial traditions of family farming comparing with other EU countries, lack of financial resources for innovative growth, poor family business including family farming culture and lack of values keeping families together, lack of interest of family farmers in diversified activities including social entrepreneurship in rural areas. The grounded solutions and suggestions how to improve situation in rural areas for family farmers are needed. One of the suggestions in this paper about the situation is diversified family farms activity with additional innovative activities and deeper involvement of young farmers in the family business. Social entrepreneurship could be a possible solution for family farms in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolita Greblikaite & Vitalija Vanagiene & Zivile Ziukaite, 2017. "Family farms in Lithuania: Problems and challenges," Ekonomia Społeczna/Social Economy, Collegium of Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 64-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:aga:esjour:v:1:y:2017:p:64-71
    DOI: 10.15678/ES.2017.1.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.msap.pl/doki/polrocznik/ES012017/ES012017-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15678/ES.2017.1.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayal Kimhi & Noga Nachlieli, 2001. "Intergenerational Succession on Israeli Family Farms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 42-58, May.
    2. Lindahl, Barbro, 2005. "The Family Farm Model in Swedish Agricultural Policy," 94th Seminar, April 9-10, 2005, Ashford, UK 24413, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Garner, Elisabeth & de la O Campos, Ana Paula, 2014. "Identifying the family farm. An informal discussion of the concepts and definitions," ESA Working Papers 288978, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hennessy, Thia C., 2002. "Modeling Succession on Irish Dairy Farms," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24953, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Miles Corak & Patrizio Piraino, 2011. "The Intergenerational Transmission of Employers," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 37-68, January.
    3. Peter Howley & Emma Dillon & Thia Hennessy, 2014. "It’s not all about the money: understanding farmers’ labor allocation choices," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(2), pages 261-271, June.
    4. Shin, Mika W. & Loughrey, Jason & Dillon, Emma & Geoghegan, Cathal, 2022. "Economic and Social Drivers of Farm Succession in Ireland," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321164, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    5. Zegar, Józef, 2020. "The Perspectives of Family Farms – Continuation," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311228, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    6. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Intergenerational Succession on Family Farms: Evidence from Survey Data," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24918, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Thia C. Hennessy & Tahir Rehman, 2008. "Assessing the Impact of the ‘Decoupling’ Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy on Irish Farmers’ Off‐farm Labour Market Participation Decisions," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 41-56, February.
    8. Elisabeth Simelton & Tuan Minh Duong & Ella Houzer, 2021. "When the “Strong Arms” Leave the Farms—Migration, Gender Roles and Risk Reduction in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Pessotto, Ana Paula & Costa, Carlos & Schwinghamer, Timothy & Colle, Gabriel & Corte, Vitor Francisco Dalla, 2019. "Factors influencing intergenerational succession in family farm businesses in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Ayal Kimhi, 2004. "Family Composition and Off-Farm Participation Decisions in Israeli Farm Households," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(2), pages 502-512.
    11. Mishra, Ashok K. & El-Osta, Hisham S. & Johnson, James D., 2004. "Succession In Family Farm Business: Empirical Evidence From The U.S. Farm Sector," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20114, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Hanna Klikocka & Aneta Zakrzewska & Piotr Chojnacki, 2021. "Characteristics of Models of Farms in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Roland Ebel, 2020. "Are Small Farms Sustainable by Nature?—Review of an Ongoing Misunderstanding in Agroecology," Challenges in Sustainability, Librello publishing house, vol. 8(1), pages 17-29.
    14. Chi Su & Richard A. Schoney & James F. Nolan, 2023. "Buy, sell or rent the farm: succession planning and the future of farming on the Great Plains," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(3), pages 627-669, July.
    15. Tietje, Hendrik, 2003. "Hofnachfolgesituation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Analyse von Querschnittsdaten auf Kreisebene," FE Working Papers 0301, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies.
    16. Calus, Mieke & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2008. "The succession effect within management decisions of family farms," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44131, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Ghinoi, Stefano & Wesz Junior, Valdemar João & Piras, Simone, 2018. "Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 68-80.
    18. Dengyan Ji & Xiaoping Shi & Xiaojuan Luo & Xianlei Ma, 2023. "The Impact of Intergenerational Inheritance on the Scale of Farmland Management in the Context of Aging: Evidence from Eastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Findeis, Jill L., 2002. "Subjective Equilibrium Theory of the Farm Household: Theory Revisited and New Directions," Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, April 12-13,2002, Wye Campus, Imperial College 15723, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    20. Lowder, Sarah K. & Sánchez, Marco V. & Bertini, Raffaele, 2021. "Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family farms; rural development; Lithuania; social entrepreneurship;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aga:esjour:v:1:y:2017:p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Kukiełka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aekrapl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.