IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2026i1p65-79.html

Consumer Perceptions and Cognitive Biases in Digital and Traditional Brand Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Denisa-Andreea PROFIR

    (Essity)

  • Daniela MARINICÄ‚

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly fragmented media environment driven by digital transformation, brands are confronted with challenges in maintaining effective communication across both digital and traditional media channels. Against this background, the present study investigates consumer perceptions and evaluations of brand communication within the online fashion retail industry, using Fashion Days as a case study. The research focuses on consumers’ exposure to various communication sources, the perceived differences between digital and traditional brand communication, and the perceived effectiveness of these communication environments. To address these objectives, the study employs a quantitative research approach based on an online self-administered survey distributed among current and potential users of the brand. The questionnaire examined respondents’ media consumption habits, perceptions regarding communication characteristics such as visibility, diversity, and personalization, as well as their evaluations of different communication techniques used by the retailer. The findings reveal significant differences between digital and traditional communication channels, with digital media being perceived as more visible, diverse, interactive, and personalized. In particular, social media communication, influencer marketing, and search engine-based advertising were evaluated more favorably compared to traditional communication formats. Furthermore, the results indicate that consumers tend to perceive more positively the communication environments they use more frequently and in which they interact more actively with the brand. This pattern suggests the presence of cognitive biases, including the mere-exposure effect, confirmation bias, and the availability heuristic, which influence consumers’ evaluations of brand communication effectiveness. The study provides relevant implications for the development of integrated communication strategies, highlighting the importance of aligning communication channels with consumer media habits and cognitive processing mechanisms. The originality of the research derives from incorporating a cognitive bias perspective into the analysis of brand communication effectiveness and from offering empirical insights into the Romanian multibrand online fashion retail market.

Suggested Citation

  • Denisa-Andreea PROFIR & Daniela MARINICÄ‚, 2026. "Consumer Perceptions and Cognitive Biases in Digital and Traditional Brand Communication," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 65-79, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:65-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2026/JETIMM_V01_2026_180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:65-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.