IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v3y2014p50-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Romanian agri-food trade competitiveness in the post-accession period

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia Gavrilescu

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, The Romanian Academy, Romania)

Abstract

Romanian agri-food exports to the EU have increased significantly after accession. The paper is presenting a study on the significant changes occurred in the competitiveness of the Romanian exports to the EU and to the main trade partners in the EU, using the CMS (Constant Market Share) method. The empirical results show that the increase in the Romanian agri-food exports to the EU may be attributed mostly to the competitiveness improvement (residual effect) and secondly to a better adaptation to the EU import markets (second order effect). The increase in the market size of the destination country (market size effect) is the least important factor, nevertheless positive for all studied countries and product groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia Gavrilescu, 2014. "Changes in the Romanian agri-food trade competitiveness in the post-accession period," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3, pages 50-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:3:y:2014:p:50-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2014edition/file2014(6).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rusali, Mirela, 2013. "Eu Accession Impacts On The Comparative Advantages In Agricultural Trade: Romania’S Case," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Rusali, Mirela & Gavrilescu, Camelia, 2008. "Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages in Romania’s Agri-Food Trade -Trends and Challenges," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44118, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jan Fagerberg & Gunnar Sollie, 1987. "The method of constant market shares analysis reconsidered," Working Papers Archives 1987001, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    4. Jozsef Fogarasi, 2008. "Hungarian and Romanian Agri-Food Trade in the European Union," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 3(1), pages 3-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gavrilescu, Camelia, 2015. "Romanian agri-food trade with the new member states (NMS-13) of the EU - a comparative analysis," MPRA Paper 69261, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gavrilescu, Camelia & Mateoc, Sirb Nicoleta & Mateoc, Teodor, 2017. "Romanian agrifood trade with the mediterranean countries – from the Barcelona declaration to the euro-mediterranean partnership," MPRA Paper 85092, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Di Berardino & Giuseppe Mauro & Davide Quaglione & Alessandro Sarra, 2017. "Structural change and the sustainability of regional convergence: Evidence from the Italian regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(2), pages 289-311, March.
    2. Daniel de Munnik & Jocelyn Jacob & Wesley Sze, 2012. "The Evolution of Canada’s Global Export Market Share," Staff Working Papers 12-31, Bank of Canada.
    3. Zelal Kotan & Serdar Sayan, 2001. "A Comparison Of The Price Competitiveness Of Turkish And South East Asian Exports In The European Union Market In The 1990s," Discussion Papers 0102, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    4. Gilbert, John & Muchová, Eva, 2018. "Export competitiveness of Central and Eastern Europe since the enlargement of the EU," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 78-85.
    5. Ursu, Ana, 2016. "“Agricultural Economics and Rural Development - realities and perspectives for Romania”," MPRA Paper 75599, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Guo, Zhichao & Feng, Yuanhua & Tan, Xiangyong, 2011. "Short- and long-term impact of remarkable economic events on the growth causes of China–Germany trade in agri-food products," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2359-2368.
    7. Irwin, Douglas A., 1995. "The lion's share: Britain's export performance revisited, 1899-1929," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 97-109, March.
    8. Vasilii Erokhin & Gao Tianming & Anna Ivolga, 2021. "Cross-Country Potentials and Advantages in Trade in Fish and Seafood Products in the RCEP Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-40, March.
    9. Jorge Chami Batista, 2008. "Competition between Brazil and other exporting countries in the US import market: a new extension of constant-market-shares analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(19), pages 2477-2487.
    10. Unknown, 2011. "Journal of Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 6, Issue 2," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 6(2), pages 127-127.
    11. Juhász, Anikó & Wagner, Hartmut, 2013. "An analysis of Hungarian agri-food export competitiveness," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(3), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Fitawek, Wegayehu Bogale & Kalaba, Mmatlou, 2016. "The role of trade policy on Ethiopia’s leather industry: effect of export tax on competitiveness," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246458, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    13. Ginchev Ivan & Guerraggio Angelo & Rocca Matteo, 2002. "On second-order conditions in vector optimization," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0218, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    14. Bernhard Klaus Michel, 2010. "Working Paper 06-10 - La part de marché à l’exportation de la Belgique 1993-2008 : changements structurels et compétitivité," Working Papers 1006, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    15. Vasilii Erokhin & Li Diao & Peiran Du, 2020. "Sustainability-Related Implications of Competitive Advantages in Agricultural Value Chains: Evidence from Central Asia—China Trade and Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Tudor, Monica Mihaela & Chitea, Mihai Alexandru & Rosu, Elisabeta Stefania, 2017. "Competitiveness and innovation in rural Romania," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 14, pages 1-18.
    17. Montobbio, Fabio & Rampa, Francesco, 2005. "The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 527-547, April.
    18. Yue Lin, 2018. "Post-crisis China impact on trade integration and manufacturing competitiveness between Argentina and Brazil," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 147-170, April.
    19. Jorge Chami Batista & Yan Liu, 2017. "Export Quality and the Dynamics of North–South Competition," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 207-232, January.
    20. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Zheng, Hong-Hao & Pei, Ling-Ling & Jin, Tong, 2017. "Decomposition of the factors influencing export fluctuation in China's new energy industry based on a constant market share model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 22-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:3:y:2014:p:50-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.