What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS2
AbstractThe purpose of this study is to explore the factors that allow firms to benefit from knowledge developed inuniversities and government labs or that drive them to collaborate with these institutions. A number ofstudies have examined this question from various perspectives: the characteristics of the knowledge beingtransferred, the complementarity between the assets of the two parties involved in the collaboration, and theorganizational aspects facilitating collaboration and knowledge transfer between firms anduniversities/research labs. Santoro and Gopalakrishnan (2000) review this literature and examine inparticular the organizational dimension of industry-university collaborations. Hall, Link and Scott (2000)conclude from their analysis of partnerships in the U.S. Advanced Technology Program that universitiesare invited to collaborate with industry (as a contractor or as a research partner) in projects that involve newscience, unknown technological territory. We shall focus on the economic determinants of collaborationand knowledge-sourcing from universities and government labs, factors such as size, group membership,degree of innovativeness, growth and government support.Universities and government laboratories are more than private firms heavily involved in basic R&Dbecause it has the character of a public good. Many studies, starting with Mansfield (1980), estimate a highrate of return on basic R&D. Adams (1990) estimates high spillover effects from academic R&D. Jaffe(1989) and Acs, Audretsch and Feldman (1992) even find that the geographical proximity to universitiesincreases innovation, be it measured by the degree of patenting or by the number of new productsintroduced in the market. Henderson, Jaffe and Trajtenberg (1998) find that university patents are moreimportant (cited over a few generations of citations) and more general (cited in a broad range of fields) thanthe average patent. There is thus a fair amount of empirical evidence showing that academic institutionsproduce substantial R&D spillovers.Firms should therefore be interested in forging links, perhaps even in collaborating with universities orgovernment laboratories in order to capture timely new technological opportunities stemming from basicresearch. Indeed, proximity to basic science is reported by Cohen (1995) to be one of the main determinantsof innovation. Governments in their quest to maximize the social return of innovation should also beconcerned with fostering such links between private firms and basic research institutions. Not all firms,though, are ready to seek such links and to be able to benefit from them. It would be interesting to knowwhat profile of firm it takes, for instance size, group affiliation, or the presence of research activities, toseek close contacts and collaborate with centers of basic research. Knowing that, governments could focustheir attention to this type of firms to maximize the efficiency in the allocation of public R&D money.The CIS2 (the second European Community Innovation Surveys) database contains two types ofinformation regarding industry links with universities and government labs. One is about the role ofuniversities or government labs as sources of information for innovation, and the other is aboutcollaboration with universities or government labs. Given the other information about enterprises that iscontained in the innovation surveys, we try to uncover some of the factors that encourage firms to interactwith universities or government labs.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT) in its series Research Memorandum with number 009.
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
economics of technology ;
Other versions of this item:
- Masao Nakamura & Pierre Mohnen & Cathy Hoareau, 2003. "What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2-3), pages 133-145.
- Cathy Hoareau & Pierre Mohnen, 2002. "What Type Of Enterprise Forges Close Links With Universities And Government Labs? Evidence From CIS 2," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-25, CIRANO.
- CIS - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - - - -
- CIS - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - - - -
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- James D. Adams & Eric P. Chiang & Jeffrey L. Jensen, 2003.
"The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics,
MIT Press, vol. 85(4), pages 1003-1020, November.
- James D. Adams & Eric P. Chiang & Jeffrey L. Jensen, 2000. "The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research," NBER Working Papers 7612, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- James D. Adams & Eric P. Chiang & Jeffrey L. Jensen, 2003. "The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research," Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0301, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics.
- David B. Audretsch & Marco Vivarelli, 1994.
"Small firms and R&D spillovers : Evidence from Italy,"
Revue d'Économie Industrielle,
Programme National Persée, vol. 67(1), pages 225-237.
- Audretsch, David B & Vivarelli, Marco, 1994. "Small Firms and R&D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy," CEPR Discussion Papers 927, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mansfield, Edwin, 1980. "Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 863-73, December.
- Bronwyn H. Hall, Albert N. Link and John T. Scott., 2000.
"Universities as Research Partners,"
Economics Working Papers
E00-276, University of California at Berkeley.
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2001. "Universities as Research Partners," Development and Comp Systems 0012001, EconWPA.
- Hall, Bronwyn & Link, Albert & Scott, John, 2010. "Universities as Research Partners," Working Papers 10-9, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
- Hall, Browyn H. & Link, Albert N. & Scott, John T., 2000. "Universities as Research Partners," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt1np920r9, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2000. "Universities as Research Partners," NBER Working Papers 7643, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bronwyn Hall & Albert N. Link and John T. Scott, 2000. "Universities as Research Partners," Economics Series Working Papers 2000-W18, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Bruno Cassiman & Reinhilde Veugelers, 1998.
"R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence,"
Economics Working Papers
328, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Cassiman, Bruno & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 1999. "R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 2330, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Cassiman, Bruno & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2001. "R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence," IESE Research Papers D/430, IESE Business School.
- Heckman, James, 2013.
"Sample selection bias as a specification error,"
Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
- Acs, Zoltan J & Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1994. "R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(2), pages 336-40, May.
- Acs, Zoltan J & Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1992. "Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 363-67, March.
- Adams, James D, 1990. "Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(4), pages 673-702, August.
- Duguet, E., 2000. "Knowledge Diffusion, Technological Innovation and TFP Growth at the Firm Level : Evidence from French Manufacturing," Papiers d'Economie MathÃÂ©matique et Applications 2000.105, UniversitÃ© PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
- Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-70, December.
- Cassiman, Bruno & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition and Cooperation," CEPR Discussion Papers 3284, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charles Bollen).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.