This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Physician dispensing and the choice between generic and brand-name drugs – Do margins affect choice?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Maurus Rischatsch () (Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich)
Maria Trottmann ()
Abstract

Many politicians blame physician dispensing (PD) to increase health care expenditure and to undermine independence of drug prescription and income leading to a suboptimal medication. Therefore, PD is not allowed in most OECD countries. In Switzerland, PD is allowed in some regions depending on the density of pharmacies. This enables to investigate the difference in prescribing behavior between physician which gain income from prescribing a specific drug and their colleagues which prescribe the drug but do not sell it. Because the considered drugs are bioequivalent we focus on the economic consequence of PD. We analyze the prescribing behavior of Swiss physicians using cross-sectional data between 2005 and 2007 for three important agents. The results support our hypothesis that dispensing physicians have a higher probability of prescribing the drug with the (most likely) higher margin compared to non-dispensing physicians. Further, generic drugs are prescribed more often to patients with higher cost-sharing while patients' cost-sharing is less influential with PD. High-income patients face a much higher probability to receive the brand-name drug due to their lower marginal utility of income. Today's administered reimbursement prices for generics seem to be high enough to gain physicians for prescribing generics because of their high margins.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.soi.uzh.ch/research/wp/2009/wp0911.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: first version, 2009
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute in its series Working Papers with number 0911.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 14 pages
Date of creation: Jul 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:soz:wpaper:0911

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Bl�mlisalpstrasse 10, CH-8006 Z�rich
Phone: +41-1-634 22 05
Fax: +41-1-634 49 07
Email:
Web page: http://www.soi.uzh.ch/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Harry Telser).

Related research
Keywords: Physician dispensing; prescribing behavior; generics; brand-name drugs;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Ilja Neustadt & Peter Zweifel, 2009. "Social Mobility and Preferences for Income Redistribution: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment," Working Papers 0909, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  2. Stefan Boes & Kevin Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2007. "Hedonic Adaptation to Living Standards and the Hidden Cost of Parental Income," Working Papers 0713, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  3. Boris Krey & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "Efficient Electricity Portfolios for the United States and Switzerland: An Investor View," Working Papers 0812, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  4. Kevin E. Staub, 2009. "Simple tests for exogeneity of a binary explanatory variable in count data regression models," Working Papers 0904, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  5. Philippe Widmer & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "Provision of Public Goods in a Federalist Country: Tiebout Competition, Fiscal Equalization, and Incentives for Efficiency in Switzerland," Working Papers 0804, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  6. Nick Netzer & Florian Scheuer, 2009. "Competitive Screening in Insurance Markets with Endogenous Wealth Heterogeneity," Working Papers 0907, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute, revised Jun 2009. [Downloadable!]
  7. Adrian Bruhin, 2008. "Stochastic Expected Utility and Prospect Theory in a Horse Race: A Finite Mixture Approach," Working Papers 0803, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  8. Kevin E. Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2009. "Robust estimation of zero-inflated count models," Working Papers 0908, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  9. Dario Sacco & Armin Schmutzler, 2008. "All-Pay Auctions with Negative Prize Externalities: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 0806, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  10. Boris Krey, 2008. "Scope of Electricity Efficiency Improvement in Switzerland until 2035," Working Papers 0813, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. [Downloadable!]
  11. McGuire, Thomas G., 2000. "Physician agency," Handbook of Health Economics, in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, pages 461-536 Elsevier. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.