China: Shadow WTO agricultural domestic support notifications
Abstract"This paper reviews recent agricultural policy changes in China and presents estimates of domestic support for the period 1996-2005. A set of relevant alternative subsidy-definition scenarios and their effects on the calculated levels of support are analyzed, and a projection of domestic support through 2013 is presented. The paper concludes with a discussion of new WTO rules that may be negotiated in the Doha Round and their implications for China. Based on standard WTO subsidy calculation methods, our results indicated that China's domestic support for the period 1996-2005 has been well below the limits agreed at its WTO accession. The market price support (MPS) component of the aggregate measure of support (AMS) in China has been below zero, and this has dwarfed the relatively small but positive non-product specific AMS and led to a zero current total AMS after de minimis. China has no AMS commitments but can provide trade-distorting domestic support to agricultural producers up to 8.5 percent of the value of production (or RMB561 billion). Thus there appears to be substantial room for China to extend its amber box subsidy measures through heavy use of the de minimis provision. We project domestic support notifications through 2013 based on specified assumptions about domestic policies, including changes in administered prices and commodity program coverage. New rules potentially negotiated in the Doha Round are expected to provide more constraints on subsidies. Due to China's developing country status, with no AMS commitments under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture the impacts of these new constraints are shown to be limited, although our projections indicate that China may exceed its WTO commitment levels under certain price and commodity coverage scenarios." from authors' abstract
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in its series IFPRI discussion papers with number 793.
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Agricultural policies; WTO Doha round; WTO compliance; Notification of domestic support; China agricultural support policies; Globalization; Markets;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-AGR-2008-10-21 (Agricultural Economics)
- NEP-ALL-2008-10-21 (All new papers)
- NEP-CNA-2008-10-21 (China)
- NEP-DEV-2008-10-21 (Development)
- NEP-TRA-2008-10-21 (Transition Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Kwiecinski, Andrzej & van Tongeren, Frank W., 2007. "Quantitative Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in China: 1993-2005," China's Agricultural Trade: Issues and Prospects Symposium, July 2007, Beijing, China, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium 55028, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
- Fangbin Qiao & Bryan Lohmar & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle & Linxiu Zhang, 2003. "Producer Benefits from Input Market and Trade Liberalization: The Case of Fertilizer in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1223-1227.
- Dermot J. Hayes & Frank H. Fuller, 1999.
"Optimal Chinese Agricultural Trade Patterns under the Laws of Comparative Advantage,"
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at Iowa State University
99-wp233, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at Iowa State University.
- Dermot J. Hayes & Frank H. Fuller, 1999. "Optimal Chinese Agricultural Trade Patterns under the Laws of Comparative Advantage," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-wp233, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
- Anderson, Kym & Martin, William J., 2007.
"Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia,"
Agricultural Distortions Working Paper, World Bank
48557, World Bank.
- Chang, Gene H., 2002. "The cause and cure of China's widening income disparity," China Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 335-340, December.
- Fuzhi Cheng & David Orden, 2007. "Exchange rate alignment and producer support estimates (PSEs) for India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 233-243, 03.
- Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott & Martin, William J. & Liu, Yu, 2007. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in China," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper, World Bank 48478, World Bank.
- Will Martin, 2001. "Implications of reform and WTO accession for China' agricultural policies," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 9(3), pages 717-742, November.
- Huang,Yiping, 1998. "Agricultural Reform in China," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521620550, 9.
- Shenggen Fan & Connie Chan-Kang, 2005. "Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 135-146, 01.
- Carter, Colin A. & Li, Xianghong, 1999. "Economic Reform And The Changing Pattern Of China'S Agricultural Trade," Working Papers, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 11957, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
- Meng, Lei, 2012. "Can grain subsidies impede ruralâ€“urban migration in hinterland China? Evidence from field surveys," China Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 729-741.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.