Monotonicity properties of bargaining solutions when applied to economics

Citations

Cited by:

1. Qi Feng & Yuanchen Li & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Negotiations in Competing Supply Chains: The Kalai-Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5868-5890, August.
2. Ehlers, Lars & Klaus, Bettina, 2016. "Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy-proofness and comparative statics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 128-146.
   • Lars EHLERS & Bettina KLAUS, 2014. "Object Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance : Strategy-Proofness and Comparative Statics," Cahiers de recherche 14-2014, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
   • Lars Ehlers & Bettina Klaus, 2014. "Object Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance: Strategy-Proofness and Comparative Statics," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 14.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
   • EHLERS, Lars & KLAUS, Bettina, 2014. "Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: strategy-proofness and comparative statics," Cahiers de recherche 2014-10, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
3. Huber, Samuel & Kim, Jaehong, 2019. "The role of trading frictions in financial markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-18.
   • Samuel Huber & Jaehong Kim, 2015. "The role of trading frictions in financial markets," ECON - Working Papers 211, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2017.
4. Xu, Yongsheng & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2019. "Does dynamic market competition with technological innovation leave no one behind?," Discussion Paper Series 699, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
   • Youngsheng Xu & Naoki Yoshihara, 2019. "Does dynamic market competition with technological innovation leave no one behind?," Working Papers SDES-2019-11, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2019.
5. Gugl, Elisabeth & Leroux, Justin, 2011. "Share the gain, share the pain? Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and bargaining solutions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 133-143.
   • Elisabeth Gugl, 2007. "Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, Changes in Production Possibilities, and Bargaining Solutions," Department Discussion Papers 0705, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
   • Elisabeth Gugl & Justin Leroux, 2009. "Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, Changes in Production Possibilities and Bargaining Solutions," Department Discussion Papers 0903, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
   • Elisabeth Gugl & Justin Leroux, 2009. "Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, changes in production possibilities, and bargaining solutions," Cahiers de recherche 09-05, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
   • Elisabeth Gugl & Justin Leroux, 2009. "Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, Changes in Production Possibilities, and Bargaining Solutions," Cahiers de recherche 0938, CIRPEE.
6. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "Monotonicity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 338-346.
   • Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2021. "Monotonicity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," Working Papers 21.09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
   • Bergantiños, Gustavo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2021. "Monotonicity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," MPRA Paper 105643, University Library of Munich, Germany.
7. Bu, Nanyang, 2022. "A new fairness notion in the assignment of indivisible resources," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-7.
8. Clark, Derek, 1995. "Priority setting in health care: An axiomatic bargaining approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 345-360, August.
9. XU, Yongsheng & YOSHIHARA, Naoki, 2025. "Does Dynamic Market Competition with Technological Innovation Leave No One Behind? : An Axiomatic Study in OLG Frameworks," Discussion Paper Series 769, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
10. Vincent Martinet & Pedro Gajardo & Michel Lara, 2024. "Bargaining on monotonic social choice environments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 209-238, March.
    • Vincent Martinet & Pedro Gajardo & Michel de Lara, 2024. "Bargaining on monotonic social choice environments [Négociation dans des environnements de choix sociaux monotones]," Post-Print hal-04121882, HAL.
11. Thomson, William, 2011. "Chapter Twenty-One - Fair Allocation Rules," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 393-506, Elsevier.
12. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
13. Bettina Klaus & Lars Ehlers, 2015. "Resource-Monotonicity for House Allocation," Working Papers 33, Barcelona School of Economics.
14. Lars Ehlers & Bettina Klaus, 2013. "House Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance," Cahiers de recherche 06-2013, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    • EHLERS, Lars & KLAUS, Bettina, 2013. "House Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance," Cahiers de recherche 2013-05, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
15. Rebelo, S., 1997. "On the Determinant of Economic Growth," RCER Working Papers 443, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
16. Michael R. Caputo, 2016. "Intrinsic Comparative Statics of a Nash Bargaining Solution," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-11, December.
17. Thomson, William, 1997. "The Replacement Principle in Economies with Single-Peaked Preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 145-168, September.
18. Dur, Umut & Paiement, Scott, 2024. "A characterization of the top trading cycles mechanism for the school choice problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 93-100.
    • Dur, Umut, 2012. "A Characterization of the Top Trading Cycles Mechanism for the School Choice Problem," MPRA Paper 41366, University Library of Munich, Germany.
19. Youngsub Chun, 2006. "The Separability Principle in Economies with Single-Peaked Preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(2), pages 239-253, April.
20. Mizukami, Hideki & Wakayama, Takuma, 2020. "Dominant strategy implementation of bargaining solutions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 60-67.
21. Kamada, Yuichiro & Kojima, Fuhito, 2026. "Choice or competition: does integration benefit everyone?," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 21(1), January.
22. Valenciano, Federico & Zarzuelo, Jose M., 1997. "On Nash's Hidden Assumption," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 21(1-2), pages 266-281, October.
23. Lars Ehlers & Bettina Klaus, 2004. "Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 32(4), pages 545-560, August.
    • Lars Ehlers & Bettina Klaus, 2003. "Resource-Monotonicity for House Allocation Problems," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 566.03, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    • EHLERS, Lars & KLAUS, Bettina, 2003. "Resource-Monotonicity for House Allocation Problems," Cahiers de recherche 12-2003, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    • EHLERS, Lars & KLAUS, Bettina, 2003. "Resource-Monotonicity for House Allocation Problems," Cahiers de recherche 2003-14, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
24. Nicolo, Antonio & Perea, Andres, 2005. "Monotonicity and equal-opportunity equivalence in bargaining," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 221-243, March.
25. William Thomson, 2024. "Allocation rules are very generally vulnerable to the strategic withholding of endowments," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 53(3), pages 791-809, September.
26. Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 1997. "A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 55-72, January.
    • Dagan, N. & Serrano, R. & Volij, O.C., 1994. "A Non-Cooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Other publications TiSEM c8f9a0f9-e85c-4e61-837f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    • Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1997. "A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Economic theory and game theory 005, Nir Dagan.
    • Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto, 1997. "A Non-Cooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5130, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Dagan, N. & Serrano, R. & Volij, O.C., 1994. "A Non-Cooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Discussion Paper 1994-11, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
27. Doğan, Battal & Klaus, Bettina, 2018. "Object allocation via immediate-acceptance: Characterizations and an affirmative action application," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 140-156.
    • Battal Dogan & Bettina Klaus, 2018. "Object Allocation via Immediate-Acceptance: Characterizations and an Affirmative Action Application," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 16.15, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
28. Lars Ehlers & Bettina Klaus, 2013. "House Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance (N.B.: This paper has been extended and results are now contained in working paper 14.08.)," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 13.10, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
29. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Gallo, Oihane & Inarra, Elena & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2024. "Solidarity to achieve stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 368-377.
    • Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Oihane Gallo & Elena Inarra & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2023. "Solidarity to achieve stability," Papers 2302.07618, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
30. Nanyang Bu, 2014. "Characterizations of the sequential priority rules in the assignment of object types," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 635-645, October.
31. Vincent Martinet & Pedro Gajardo & Michel de Lara, 2021. "Bargaining On Monotonic Economic Environments," Working Papers hal-03206724, HAL.
32. Abizada, Azar & Chen, Siwei, 2016. "House allocation when availability of houses may change unexpectedly," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 29-37.
33. Gerber, Anke & Upmann, Thorsten, 2006. "Bargaining solutions at work: Qualitative differences in policy implications," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 162-175, September.
34. Jin Li & Jingyi Xue, 2013. "Egalitarian division under Leontief Preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(3), pages 597-622, November.
35. Boragan Aruoba, S. & Rocheteau, Guillaume & Waller, Christopher, 2007. "Bargaining and the value of money," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2636-2655, November.
    • Guillaume Rocheteau & Christopher J. Waller, 2005. "Bargaining and the value of money," Working Papers (Old Series) 0501, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
36. Elisabeth Gugl, 2007. "Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and the Nash Bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions," Department Discussion Papers 0702, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
37. Huber, Samuel & Kim, Jaehong, 2017. "On the optimal quantity of liquid bonds," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 184-200.
    • Samuel Huber & Jaehong Kim, 2015. "On the optimal quantity of liquid bonds," ECON - Working Papers 193, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Apr 2017.
38. Battal Doğan & Serhat Doğan & Kemal Yıldız, 2021. "Lexicographic choice under variable capacity constraints," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(1), pages 172-196, February.
    • Battal Dogan & Serhat Dogan & Kemal Yildiz, 2017. "Lexicographic Choice under Variable Capacity Constraints," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 17.02, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    • Battal Dogan & Serhat Dogan & Kemal Yildiz, 2019. "Lexicographic Choice Under Variable Capacity Constraints," Papers 1910.13237, arXiv.org.
39. Thomson, William, 2012. "On The Axiomatics Of Resource Allocation: Interpreting The Consistency Principle," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 385-421, November.
    • William Thomson, 2012. "On the axiomatics of resource allocation: Interpreting the consistency principle," RCER Working Papers 573, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
40. Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz, 2017. "Some further properties of the cumulative offer process," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 656-665.
41. Thomson, William, 2024. "On the manipulability of allocation rules through endowment augmentation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 91-104.
42. William Thomson, 2009. "Borrowing-proofness," RCER Working Papers 545, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
43. Christopher Waller & Guillaume Rocheteau, 2005. "Bargaining in Monetary Economies," 2005 Meeting Papers 55, Society for Economic Dynamics.
44. Chun, Youngsub, 2006. "A pessimistic approach to the queueing problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 171-181, March.
45. Youngsub Chun & Inkee Jang & Biung-Ghi Ju, 2014. "Priority, solidarity and egalitarianism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 577-589, October.
    • Youngsub Chun & Inkee Jang & Biung-Ghi Ju, 2012. "Priority, Solidarity and Egalitarianism," Working Paper Series no86, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.
46. Bossert, Walter, 1998. "Welfarism and rationalizability in allocation problems with indivisibilities1," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 133-150, March.
47. Corchon, Luis C. & Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Inigo, 2001. "A Proposal to Unify Some Concepts in the Theory of Fairness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 540-571, December.
    • Iñigo Iturbe-Ormaetxe Kortajarene & Luis Corchón, 1997. "A proposal to unify some concepts in the theory of fairness," Working Papers. Serie AD 1997-21, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
48. Sertel, Murat R. & Yildiz, Muhamet, 1999. "Double-edged population monotonicity of Walrasian equilibrium--a note on the nature of competition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 235-251, May.
49. Josep Maria Izquierdo & Carlos Rafels, 2017. "The incentive core in co-investment problems," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2017/369, University of Barcelona School of Economics.