IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jomega/v35y2007i1p104-115.html

The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2014. "Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 83-95.
  2. Ketikidis, P.H. & Koh, S.C.L. & Dimitriadis, N. & Gunasekaran, A. & Kehajova, M., 2008. "The use of information systems for logistics and supply chain management in South East Europe: Current status and future direction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 592-599, August.
  3. Li, Shanshan & He, Yong & Chen, Lujie, 2017. "Dynamic strategies for supply disruptions in production-inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 88-101.
  4. Silbermayr, Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2016. "Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 226-238.
  5. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
  6. Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Dorsch, Christoph & Henneberger, Matthias, 2011. "Multiple-Sourcing-Strategien bei Finanzdienstleistern – Eine Analyse zum Einfluss der Integrationskosten am Beispiel der Wertpapierabwicklung," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(4), pages 334-351.
  7. Hu, Xiaojian & Wang, Guanxiong & Li, Xiaozheng & Zhang, Yue & Feng, Shuai & Yang, Aifeng, 2018. "Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-95.
  8. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2011. "Negative default dependence in supplier networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 398-406, December.
  9. Preetam Basu & Soumita Ghosh & Milan Kumar, 2019. "Supplier ratings and dynamic sourcing strategies to mitigate supply disruption risks," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 41-57, March.
  10. Chao Fang & Xiangxiang Liao & Min Xie, 2016. "A hybrid risks-informed approach for the selection of supplier portfolio," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2019-2034, April.
  11. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
  12. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2015. "On the fair optimization of cost and customer service level in a supply chain under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 58-66.
  13. Guoqing Zhao & Shaofeng Liu & Carmen Lopez & Yi Wang & Haiyan Lu & Jinhua Zhang, 2024. "Identification, establishment of connection, and clustering of social risks involved in the agri-food supply chains: a cross-country comparative study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1241-1282, July.
  14. Mike Prince & J. Cole Smith & Joseph Geunes, 2013. "A three‐stage procurement optimization problem under uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(5), pages 395-412, August.
  15. Lücker, Florian & Seifert, Ralf W., 2017. "Building up Resilience in a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain through Inventory, Dual Sourcing and Agility Capacity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 114-124.
  16. Visani, Franco & Barbieri, Paolo & Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Raffoni, Anna & Vigo, Daniele, 2016. "Supplier’s total cost of ownership evaluation: a data envelopment analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-154.
  17. Zeng, Amy Z. & Xia, Yu, 2015. "Building a mutually beneficial partnership to ensure backup supply," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 77-91.
  18. Li, Lei & Zabinsky, Zelda B., 2011. "Incorporating uncertainty into a supplier selection problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 344-356, December.
  19. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Lai, Kee-hung & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2008. "Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 549-564, August.
  20. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
  21. Song, Dong-Ping & Dong, Jing-Xin & Xu, Jingjing, 2014. "Integrated inventory management and supplier base reduction in a supply chain with multiple uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 522-536.
  22. Zhang, Jianxiong & Tang, Wansheng & Hu, Mingmao, 2015. "Optimal supplier switching with volume-dependent switching costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 96-104.
  23. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2013. "Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 259-269.
  24. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
  25. Ray, Pritee & Jenamani, Mamata, 2016. "Mean-variance analysis of sourcing decision under disruption risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 679-689.
  26. Meena, P.L. & Sarmah, S.P. & Sarkar, A., 2011. "Sourcing decisions under risks of catastrophic event disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1058-1074.
  27. Wongthatsanekorn, Wuthichai & Realff, Matthew J. & Ammons, Jane C., 2010. "Multi-time scale Markov decision process approach to strategic network growth of reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 20-32, February.
  28. Xia, Yu, 2011. "Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 194-203, April.
  29. Yu, Haisheng & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2009. "Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 788-800, August.
  30. Maheswar Singh Mahapatra & Pravash Chandra Pradhan & J. K. Jha, 2022. "Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3291-3333, September.
  31. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2016. "Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 131-144.
  32. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
  33. Yue, Jinfeng & Xia, Yu & Tran, Thuhang, 2010. "Selecting sourcing partners for a make-to-order supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 136-144, June.
  34. Tadeusz Sawik, 2018. "Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 760-782, January.
  35. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2017. "An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 210-230.
  36. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2009. "Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 150-161, November.
  37. Roni, Mohammad S. & Jin, Mingzhou & Eksioglu, Sandra D., 2015. "A hybrid inventory management system responding to regular demand and surge demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 190-200.
  38. Golmohammadi, Davood & Mellat-Parast, Mahour, 2012. "Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 191-200.
  39. Nam, Seong-Hyun & Vitton, John & Kurata, Hisashi, 2011. "Robust supply base management: Determining the optimal number of suppliers utilized by contractors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 333-343, December.
  40. Guertler, Benjamin & Spinler, Stefan, 2015. "When does operational risk cause supply chain enterprises to tip? A simulation of intra-organizational dynamics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 54-69.
  41. Sillanpää, Ville & Liesiö, Juuso & Käki, Anssi, 2021. "Procurement decisions over multiple periods under piecewise-linear shortage costs and fixed capacity commitments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  42. Wang, Lu & Deng, Tianhu & Li, Qiaofeng, 2025. "Can feature removal benefit the automotive manufacturers amid supply shortages? An analytical investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
  43. Zhang, Wen & Katok, Elena, 2025. "To stop or not, that is the question: When should a buyer hit the brakes for supply base rationalization?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  44. Sarkar, Ashutosh & Mohapatra, Pratap K.J., 2009. "Determining the optimal size of supply base with the consideration of risks of supply disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 122-135, May.
  45. Ojha, Divesh & Patel, Pankaj C. & Chirico, Francesco & Dhir, Amandeep, 2025. "Managing uncertainty under sudden operational closures: The role of implied volatility, positive sentiment, and productivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.