IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v22y2022i4d10.1007_s12351-021-00661-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Maheswar Singh Mahapatra

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
    FLAME University)

  • Pravash Chandra Pradhan

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

  • J. K. Jha

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

Abstract

This paper addresses sourcing decisions with order allocation in the presence of supplier disruption risks in a two-echelon supply chain considering both quantitative and qualitative aspects. A mixed-integer linear program is proposed for the optimal supplier selection and order allocation considering finite and expandable production capacity, failure probability, all-unit price discount, and spot-market cost. Due to the time complexity of the problem to get an optimal solution, we develop a heuristic which is found highly efficient in time complexity and highly competitive in solution quality. A multi-objective model is formulated to capture the qualitative aspect of suppliers by maximizing the total purchase value along with minimizing the expected total cost. We have applied NSGA-II and MOPSO, two widely used evolutionary algorithms, to solve the multi-objective model. A numerical illustration is presented along with sensitivity analysis considering a supplier base of twenty suppliers and a sourcing strategy up to six suppliers. It has been found that dual-sourcing and triple-sourcing are mainly part of the non-dominated Pareto front. Also, increasing demand would lead to a higher level of sourcing strategy, which also depends on the maximum capacity of suppliers and the minimum order to be allocated to the selected suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Maheswar Singh Mahapatra & Pravash Chandra Pradhan & J. K. Jha, 2022. "Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3291-3333, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:22:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-021-00661-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-021-00661-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-021-00661-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-021-00661-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Perboli, Guido, 2018. "The Capacitated Supplier Selection problem with Total Quantity Discount policy and Activation Costs under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 119-132.
    2. Glock, C. H., 2012. "Single sourcing versus dual sourcing under conditions of learning," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57813, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. W.C. Tsai, 2016. "A dynamic sourcing strategy considering supply disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2170-2184, April.
    4. Zhang, Guoqing & Shi, Jianmai & Chaudhry, Sohail S. & Li, Xindan, 2019. "Multi-period multi-product acquisition planning with uncertain demands and supplier quantity discounts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 117-140.
    5. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    6. Meena, P.L. & Sarmah, S.P. & Sarkar, A., 2011. "Sourcing decisions under risks of catastrophic event disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1058-1074.
    7. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2010. "Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 203-212, June.
    8. Burke, Gerard J. & Carrillo, Janice E. & Vakharia, Asoo J., 2007. "Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 95-112, October.
    9. Nooraie, S. Vahid & Mellat Parast, Mahour, 2015. "A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 192-200.
    10. Hu, Shaolong & Dong, Zhijie Sasha, 2019. "Supplier selection and pre-positioning strategy in humanitarian relief," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 287-298.
    11. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2014. "Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 83-95.
    12. Yin, Zhe & Wang, Chen & Yin, Qian, 2018. "Coordinating overseas and local sourcing through a capacitated expediting transportation policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 258-271.
    13. Ghavamifar, Ali & Makui, Ahmad & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah, 2018. "Designing a resilient competitive supply chain network under disruption risks: A real-world application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 87-109.
    14. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    15. P D Berger & A Z Zeng, 2006. "Single versus multiple sourcing in the presence of risks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 250-261, March.
    16. Minner, Stefan, 2003. "Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 265-279, January.
    17. Amir Hossein Azadnia & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Kuan Yew Wong, 2015. "Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 383-408, January.
    18. Yu, Haisheng & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2009. "Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 788-800, August.
    19. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    20. Thomas, Douglas J. & Tyworth, John E., 2006. "Pooling lead-time risk by order splitting: A critical review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 245-257, July.
    21. Hossein Salehi & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2016. "An EOQ model with random disruption and partial backordering," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2600-2609, May.
    22. Cuihong Li & Laurens G. Debo, 2009. "Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 448-470, July.
    23. David Simchi-Levi & William Schmidt & Yehua Wei & Peter Yun Zhang & Keith Combs & Yao Ge & Oleg Gusikhin & Michael Sanders & Don Zhang, 2015. "Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 375-390, October.
    24. Ruiz-Torres, Alex J. & Mahmoodi, Farzad, 2007. "The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 104-115, February.
    25. Berger, Paul D. & Gerstenfeld, Arthur & Zeng, Amy Z., 2004. "How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 9-15, February.
    26. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    27. Torabi, S.A. & Baghersad, M. & Mansouri, S.A., 2015. "Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 22-48.
    28. Firouz, Mohammad & Keskin, Burcu B. & Melouk, Sharif H., 2017. "An integrated supplier selection and inventory problem with multi-sourcing and lateral transshipments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 77-93.
    29. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata, 2012. "An exact algorithm for the Capacitated Total Quantity Discount Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 287-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    2. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    3. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    4. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    5. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    6. Fattahi, Mohammad, 2021. "Resilient procurement planning for supply chains: A case study for sourcing a critical mineral material," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Sarkar, Ashutosh & Mohapatra, Pratap K.J., 2009. "Determining the optimal size of supply base with the consideration of risks of supply disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 122-135, May.
    8. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
    9. Preetam Basu & Soumita Ghosh & Milan Kumar, 2019. "Supplier ratings and dynamic sourcing strategies to mitigate supply disruption risks," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 41-57, March.
    10. Song, Dong-Ping & Dong, Jing-Xin & Xu, Jingjing, 2014. "Integrated inventory management and supplier base reduction in a supply chain with multiple uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 522-536.
    11. Silbermayr, Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2016. "Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 226-238.
    12. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2009. "Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 150-161, November.
    13. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2017. "An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 210-230.
    14. Hu, Shaolong & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Supplier selection in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    15. Tadeusz Sawik, 2018. "Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 760-782, January.
    16. Ray, Pritee & Jenamani, Mamata, 2016. "Mean-variance analysis of sourcing decision under disruption risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 679-689.
    17. Yu, Haisheng & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2009. "Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 788-800, August.
    18. Li, Shanshan & He, Yong & Chen, Lujie, 2017. "Dynamic strategies for supply disruptions in production-inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 88-101.
    19. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2013. "Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 259-269.
    20. Montanari, Roberto & Bottani, Eleonora & Shekarian, Ehsan & Kazemi, Nima, 2017. "A model for the analysis of procurement strategies in the economic order interval environment," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 79-98.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:22:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-021-00661-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.