IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cdl/econwp/qt7wh1000s.html

Promoting an open research culture

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Balafoutas, Loukas & Celse, Jeremy & Karakostas, Alexandros & Umashev, Nicholas, 2025. "Incentives and the replication crisis in social sciences: A critical review of open science practices," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  2. Janik Goltermann & Nils R. Winter & Susanne Meinert & Dominik Grotegerd & Anna Kraus & Kira Flinkenflügel & Luisa Altegoer & Judith Krieger & Elisabeth J. Leehr & Joscha Böhnlein & Linda M. Bonnekoh &, 2025. "Gray matter correlates of childhood maltreatment lack replicability in a multi-cohort brain-wide association study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
  3. Sahu, Vihaan, 2026. "Mapping the Open-Source Landscape: A Systematic Mapping and Ecosystem Analysis of Evidence Synthesis Software," MetaArXiv 7uskw_v1, Center for Open Science.
  4. Florian Jeserich & Constantin Klein & Benno Brinkhaus & Michael Teut, 2023. "Sense of coherence and religion/spirituality: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a methodical classification of instruments measuring religion/spirituality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-43, August.
  5. Chin, Jason & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2021. "Replicability in Empirical Legal Research," LawRxiv 2b5k4, Center for Open Science.
  6. repec:osf:metaar:qkjy4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  7. Julian N. Marewski & Ulrich Hoffrage, 2025. "Heuristics: how simple models of the mind can serve as tools for transparent scientific justification," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 947-998, December.
  8. Mussel, Patrick & Schäpers, Philipp & Schulte, Niklas & Hewig, Johannes & Krumm, Stefan, 2025. "The Short And Free Reasoning Ability assessmeNt (SAFRAN): Multidimensional, publicly available and only 15 minutes testing time," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  9. Caicedo, Juan D. & Guirado, Carlos & González, Marta C. & Walker, Joan L., 2025. "Sharing, collaborating, and benchmarking to advance travel demand research: A demonstration of short-term ridership prediction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 531-541.
  10. Joëts, Marc & Mignon, Valérie, 2026. "Slaying the undead: How long does it take to kill zombie papers?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
  11. Michael Gau & Anke Greif-Winzrieth & Alexander Maedche & Christof Weinhardt & Jan vom Brocke, 2025. "Engaging citizen scientists: designing an open research system for collaborative problem exploration," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16, December.
  12. Oxley, Florence A.R. & Wilding, Kirsty & von Stumm, Sophie, 2024. "DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  13. Weilun Wu & W. Robert Reed, 2025. "Meta-Analyses in Management and Marketing: An Assessment," Working Papers in Economics 25/16, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  14. Mohammad S. Jalali & Elizabeth Beaulieu, 2024. "Strengthening a weak link: transparency of causal loop diagrams — current state and recommendations," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
  15. Rahal, Rima-Maria, 2025. "Advancing openness in economic research through the lens of behavioral and experimental economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
  16. repec:osf:metaar:a8gu5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  17. Lohse, Johannes & Rahal, Rima-Maria & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael & Sofianos, Andis & Wollbrant, Conny, 2024. "Investigations of decision processes at the intersection of psychology and economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  18. Tom L. Dudda & Lars Hornuf, 2025. "The Perks and Perils of Machine Learning in Business and Economic Research," CESifo Working Paper Series 11721, CESifo.
  19. repec:osf:metaar:eqhjd_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  20. Henian Chen & Yayi Zhao & Biwei Cao & Donna J Petersen & Matthew J Valente & Weiliang Cen, 2024. "Breaking the silence of sharing data in medical research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-9, May.
  21. Konrad Turek, 2025. "Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 767-795, April.
  22. Wei Yu & Junpeng Chen & Sanhong Deng, 2024. "Open Science Under Debate: Disentangling the Interest on Twitter and Scholarly Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  23. Sandeep Neela, 2026. "An Explainable Market Integrity Monitoring System with Multi-Source Attention Signals and Transparent Scoring," Papers 2601.15304, arXiv.org.
  24. G. H. B. A. de Silva, 2025. "Data-Driven Framework for Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Inclusive Development in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, October.
  25. David Moreau & Kristina Wiebels, 2024. "Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-14, July.
  26. repec:osf:osfxxx:em9ua_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  27. Vogel, Dominik & Jacobsen, Christian Bøtcher, 2021. "Nonresponse bias in public leadership research: An empirical assessment," SocArXiv xshdw_v1, Center for Open Science.
  28. repec:plo:pbio00:1002456 is not listed on IDEAS
  29. Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch & Oliver Ambrée & Natasha A Karp & Neele Meyer & Janja Novak & Rupert Palme & Marianna Rosso & Chadi Touma & Hanno Würbel & Sylvia Kaiser & Norbert Sachser & S Helene Ri, 2022. "Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.