IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt7wh1000s.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Promoting an open research culture

Author

Listed:
  • Nosek, BA
  • Alter, G
  • Banks, GC
  • Borsboom, D
  • Bowman, SD
  • Breckler, SJ
  • Buck, S
  • Chambers, CD
  • Chin, G
  • Christensen, G
  • Contestabile, M
  • Dafoe, A
  • Eich, E
  • Freese, J
  • Glennerster, R
  • Goroff, D
  • Green, DP
  • Hesse, B
  • Humphreys, M
  • Ishiyama, J
  • Karlan, D
  • Kraut, A
  • Lupia, A
  • Mabry, P
  • Madon, TA
  • Malhotra, N
  • Mayo-Wilson, E
  • McNutt, M
  • Miguel, E
  • Paluck, E Levy
  • Simonsohn, U
  • Soderberg, C
  • Spellman, BA
  • Turitto, J
  • VandenBos, G
  • Vazire, S
  • Wagenmakers, EJ
  • Wilson, R
  • Yarkoni, T

Abstract

Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility

Suggested Citation

  • Nosek, BA & Alter, G & Banks, GC & Borsboom, D & Bowman, SD & Breckler, SJ & Buck, S & Chambers, CD & Chin, G & Christensen, G & Contestabile, M & Dafoe, A & Eich, E & Freese, J & Glennerster, R & Gor, 2015. "Promoting an open research culture," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt7wh1000s, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt7wh1000s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7wh1000s.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin, Jason & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2021. "Replicability in Empirical Legal Research," LawArchive 2b5k4_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Hamilton, Daniel George & Fraser, Hannah & Hoekstra, Rink & Fidler, Fiona, 2020. "Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review," MetaArXiv qkjy4_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Valérie Mignon & Marc Joëts, 2025. "Slaying the Undead: How Long Does It Take to Kill Zombie Papers?," Working Papers hal-04940088, HAL.
    4. Michael Gau & Anke Greif-Winzrieth & Alexander Maedche & Christof Weinhardt & Jan Brocke, 2025. "Engaging citizen scientists: designing an open research system for collaborative problem exploration," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Oxley, Florence A.R. & Wilding, Kirsty & von Stumm, Sophie, 2024. "DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Mohammad S. Jalali & Elizabeth Beaulieu, 2024. "Strengthening a weak link: transparency of causal loop diagrams — current state and recommendations," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    7. Neves, Kleber & Amaral, Olavo Bohrer, 2019. "Addressing selective reporting of experiments – the case for predefined exclusion criteria," MetaArXiv a8gu5_v1, Center for Open Science.
    8. Lohse, Johannes & Rahal, Rima-Maria & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael & Sofianos, Andis & Wollbrant, Conny, 2024. "Investigations of decision processes at the intersection of psychology and economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Tom L. Dudda & Lars Hornuf, 2025. "The Perks and Perils of Machine Learning in Business and Economic Research," CESifo Working Paper Series 11721, CESifo.
    10. van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria, 2018. "Dissertation R.C.M. van Aert," MetaArXiv eqhjd_v1, Center for Open Science.
    11. Wei Yu & Junpeng Chen & Sanhong Deng, 2024. "Open Science Under Debate: Disentangling the Interest on Twitter and Scholarly Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    12. Lui, P. Priscilla & Gobrial, Sarah & Pham, Savannah & Giadolor, Westley & Adams, Niki & Rollock, David, 2021. "Open Science and Multicultural Research: Some Data, Considerations, and Recommendations," OSF Preprints em9ua_v1, Center for Open Science.
    13. Vogel, Dominik & Jacobsen, Christian Bøtcher, 2021. "Nonresponse bias in public leadership research: An empirical assessment," SocArXiv xshdw_v1, Center for Open Science.
    14. Mallory C Kidwell & Ljiljana B Lazarević & Erica Baranski & Tom E Hardwicke & Sarah Piechowski & Lina-Sophia Falkenberg & Curtis Kennett & Agnieszka Slowik & Carina Sonnleitner & Chelsey Hess-Holden &, 2016. "Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt7wh1000s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibbrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.