IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucitm/1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen

Author

Listed:
  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja

Abstract

Soziale Innovationen werden als wichtiges Instrument für eine nachhaltige Transformation erachtet. Soziale Innovationen, wie auch andere Innovationsarten, entstehen in einem Innovationssystem, welches deren aktuellen Stand erklärt und zukünftige Entwicklung beeinflusst. Das Innovationssystem erfasst dabei die Akteure und deren Verbindungen, den politischen, wirtschaftlichen, rechtlichen und soziokulturellen Rahmen sowie eingebrachte Ressourcen wie Finanzen, Bildung, Forschung und Interessensvertretung. Da sich diese Faktoren regional, bundes- und europaweit sowie global unterscheiden können, sind Betrachtungen sinnvoll, die ein konkretes Gebiet wie z. B. ein Bundesland in den Fokus nehmen. In diesem Working Paper wird das Innovationssystem in Sachsen untersucht, um herauszufinden, wie sich das aktuelle Innovationssystem aus der Perspektive von sozialen Innovationen erfassen und darstellen lässt. Zusammenfassend lässt sich festhalten, dass vor allem zwei Akteursgruppen, die Sozialwirtschaft und das Sozialunternehmertum, maßgebliche Gestalter sozialer Innovationen in Sachsen sein können. Allerdings sie die aktuellen Gegebenheiten des Innovationssystems, z. B. politische Förderung oder Finanzmittelressourcen, für soziale Innovationen als unterschiedlich für beide Akteursgruppen einzuschätzen. Außerdem ist bei beiden Akteursgruppen eine Vorstellung zu gemeinsamer Bearbeitung sozialer Herausforderung kaum vorhanden bzw. von Vorurteilen und Angst um Ressourcen geprägt. Im Rahmen dieses Working Papers, nach der Aufarbeitung des aktuellen Situation beider Akteursgruppen und der Einbettung im Innovationssystem, wird das Potenzial für kooperative Bearbeitung gesellschaftlicher Problemlagen in Sachsen dargestellt. Außerdem werden primäre Problemlagen des Innovationssystems aus der Sicht der Expertinnen und Experten zur Umsetzung sozialer Innovationen in Sachsen beschrieben. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit basieren dabei auf einer Sekundärdatenanalyse sowie acht Experteninterviews mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern der Sozialwirtschaft und des Sozialunternehmertums. Aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive wird ein Beitrag zum Verständnis von Innovationsprozessen in der Sozialwirtschaft oder dem dritten Sektor geleistet. Außerdem wird ein Analyseraster zur Erfassung gesellschaftlicher Problemlagen und den etablierten und fehlenden sozialen Praktiken aufgestellt und genutzt. Dieses Analyseraster erfasst gleichermaßen die primären Akteursgruppen sozialer Innovationen erfasst, die sich wiederum im Rahmen der Möglichkeiten des aktuellen Innovationssystem derer Bearbeitung zuwenden.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-02, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, revised 2022.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260560/1/WP_Innovationssystem%20Sachsen_220623_TUC%20Design%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Portales, 2019. "Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-13456-3, December.
    2. Warnke, Philine & Koschatzky, Knut & Dönitz, Ewa & Zenker, Andrea & Stahlecker, Thomas & Som, Oliver & Cuhls, Kerstin & Güth, Sandra, 2016. "Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 49, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
    4. Johanna Mair & Julie Battilana & Julian Cardenas, 2012. "Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 353-373, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-01, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    3. Balázs Lengyel & Vladislav Cadil, 2009. "Innovation Policy Challenges in Transition Countries: Foreign Business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 16(1), pages 174-188, May.
    4. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    5. Mário Franco & Heiko Haase & Sandra Correia, 2018. "Exploring Factors in the Success of Creative Incubators: a Cultural Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 239-262, March.
    6. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    7. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    8. Bertschek, Irene & Ohnemus, Jörg & Erdsiek, Daniel & Rammer, Christian & Andres, Raphaela & Kimpeler, Simone, 2019. "Monitoringbericht Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2018," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 203157, February.
    9. Engel, Nora, 2009. "Innovation Dynamics in Tuberculosis Control in India: The Shift to New Partnerships," MERIT Working Papers 2009-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Cusmano, Lucia & Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2010. "Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 1588-1602, November.
    11. Krafft, Jackie & Salies, Evens, 2008. "The diffusion of ADSL and costs of switching Internet providers in the broadband industry: Evidence from the French case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 706-719, May.
    12. Kruss, Glenda & McGrath, Simon & Petersen, Il-haam & Gastrow, Michael, 2015. "Higher education and economic development: The importance of building technological capabilities," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 22-31.
    13. Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo & Lettl, Christopher & Ulhøi, John Parm, 2015. "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 269-284.
    14. Micheline Riemsdijk, 2013. "Talent Acquisition in the IT Industry in Bangalore: A Multi-Level Study," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(4), pages 478-490, September.
    15. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    16. Živojinović, I. & Weiss, G. & Wilding, M. & Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A., 2020. "Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Giuseppe Calignano & Rune Dahl Fitjar, 2017. "Strengthening relationships in clusters: How effective is an indirect policy measure carried out in a peripheral technology district?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 59(1), pages 139-169, July.
    18. Shuili Du & C. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Multi-faceted Job-Products, and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 319-335, October.
    19. Piva, Mariacristina & Santarelli, Enrico & Vivarelli, Marco, 2005. "The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: Evidence and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 141-157, March.
    20. Jackie Krafft & Evens Salies, 2006. "The cost of switching Internet providers in the French broadband industry, or why ADSL has diffused faster than other innovative technologies," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972799, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.