IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucitm/1301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen

Author

Listed:
  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-01, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Portales, 2019. "Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-13456-3, December.
    2. Warnke, Philine & Koschatzky, Knut & Dönitz, Ewa & Zenker, Andrea & Stahlecker, Thomas & Som, Oliver & Cuhls, Kerstin & Güth, Sandra, 2016. "Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 49, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Johanna Mair & Julie Battilana & Julian Cardenas, 2012. "Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 353-373, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-02, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, revised 2022.
    2. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    3. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    4. Bertschek, Irene & Ohnemus, Jörg & Erdsiek, Daniel & Rammer, Christian & Andres, Raphaela & Kimpeler, Simone, 2019. "Monitoringbericht Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2018," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 203157, February.
    5. Shuili Du & C. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Multi-faceted Job-Products, and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 319-335, October.
    6. Charles Amoyea Atogenzoya & Anna Comacchio, 2019. "Nature and Management of Social-business Tensions: A Study of Micro and Small Social Enterprises in Developing Countries," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 8612069, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    7. Syrus M Islam, 2022. "Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 298-321, May.
    8. Banerjee, Anup & Carlsson-Wall, Martin & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2024. "Hybrid board governance: Exploring the challenges in implementing social impact measurements," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    9. Piotr Weryński & Dorota Dolińska-Weryńska, 2024. "Social Capital and Reflexivity as Conditions of Organisational Morphostasis—Studies of Selected Polish NGOs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Sharma, Garima & Beveridge, 'Alim J. & Haigh, Nardia, 2018. "A configural framework of practice change for B corporations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 207-224.
    11. George Mofulu & Ancheng Pan & Pengfei Li, 2016. "Indirect reciprocity: Its antecedents and consequences in social entrepreneuring," Rationality and Society, , vol. 28(1), pages 105-138, February.
    12. Clara Vasconcelos & Nir Orion, 2021. "Earth Science Education as a Key Component of Education for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Sebastian Brenk & Dirk Lüttgens & Kathleen Diener & Frank Piller, 2019. "Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1097-1147, December.
    14. Mihaela LAMBRU & Claudia PETRESCU, 2019. "Social enterprises role in Romanian welfare system," CIRIEC Working Papers 1917, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    15. Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Sascha Kraus, 2018. "An Overview of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Sensemaking for Improving Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 313-320, June.
    16. Sumit Mitra & Aakriti Deepak, 2024. "Role of Technology in Solid Waste Management: Social Enterprise in a Pandemic," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 10(1), pages 26-40, January.
    17. Petra C. M. Neessen & Cosmina L. Voinea & Els Dobber, 2021. "Business Models of Social Enterprises: Insight into Key Components and Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Yasmin Olteanu & Klaus Fichter, 2022. "Startups as sustainability transformers: A new empirically derived taxonomy and its policy implications," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3083-3099, November.
    19. Gabriela Christmann & Ariane Sept & Ralph Richter, 2024. "Socially Innovative Initiatives in Deprived Rural Areas of Germany, Ireland and Portugal: Exploring Empowerment and Impact on Community Development," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Simon Cornée & Panu Kalmi & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "The Business Model of Social Banks," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 196-226, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.