IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kbawps/24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Credit risk analysis for low income earners

Author

Listed:
  • Ntwiga, Davis Bundi

Abstract

The low income earners have been excluded from financial services due to their limited ability to access credit as they lack good financial options. Their income is volatile, fluctuating daily and they lack reliable ways to harness the power of their low incomes. This challenge can be met through use of mobile technology to collect data on the socioeconomic activities of the low income earners at minimum costs. The success of the mobile financial services in Kenya cannot be understated coupled with increase in mobile penetration. A mobile based technology for micro-credit already exists through M-Shwari started in the year 2012 on the M-pesa platform to further increase financial inclusion. This paper pro- poses a decision support system that is mobile based for credit scoring, classification and peer group lending of the low income earners in Kenya. This facility is referred to as Mobile Micro Credit System. We hypothesize that, first, mobile micro-credit lending for low income peer groups is similar to that of the conventional individual lending. Second, credit scores and credit quality levels among low income men and women is the same. Third, a mobile based micro credit can further enhance financial inclusion among the low income earners. A comparison is made between the peer groups and individual customers in terms of their credit scores and credit quality levels. The data for the study was extracted from the financial diaries dataset by Financial Sector Deepening. Customers were clustered in peer groups and as individual households based on gender groupings of men only, women only, or men and women. The credit scoring factors were estimated and resulting data trained the hidden Markov model, the classification technique used. The hidden Markov model emit- ted the credit scores and the credit quality levels of the individual households and the peer groups in which the groups had stronger credit scores and credit quality levels compared to those of the individual households. Peer groups for women only, and those of men and women had superior credit scores when compared to men only peer groups. The optimal peer group size for lending is between four and eight members. The current mobile financial services offer a baseline to implement a mobile micro credit service for the low income earners. This is an incentive for financial services providers to consider providing mobile based micro credit loans to low income earners.

Suggested Citation

  • Ntwiga, Davis Bundi, 2018. "Credit risk analysis for low income earners," KBA Centre for Research on Financial Markets and Policy Working Paper Series 24, Kenya Bankers Association (KBA).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kbawps:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249525/1/WPS-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Netzer & James M. Lattin & V. Srinivasan, 2008. "A Hidden Markov Model of Customer Relationship Dynamics," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 185-204, 03-04.
    2. Bhole, Bharat & Ogden, Sean, 2010. "Group lending and individual lending with strategic default," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 348-363, March.
    3. Rafael Gomez & Eric Santor, 2003. "Do Peer Group Members Outperform Individual Borrowers? A Test of Peer Group Lending Using Canadian Micro-Credit Data," Staff Working Papers 03-33, Bank of Canada.
    4. Ahlin, Christian & Jiang, Neville, 2008. "Can micro-credit bring development?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 1-21, April.
    5. L Quirini & L Vannucci, 2014. "Creditworthiness dynamics and Hidden Markov Models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(3), pages 323-330, March.
    6. Davis Bundi Ntwiga & Patrick Weke & Michael Kiura Kirumbu, 2016. "Trust model for social network using singular value decomposition," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 14(3), pages 296-302.
    7. Davis Bundi Ntwiga & Patrick Weke & Michael Kiura Kirumbu, 2016. "Trust model for social network using singular value decomposition," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 14(3), pages 296-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Quidt, Jonathan & Fetzer, Thiemo & Ghatak, Maitreesh, 2016. "Group lending without joint liability," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 217-236.
    2. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Chowdhury, Prabal Roy & Sengupta, Kunal, 2014. "Sequential lending with dynamic joint liability in micro-finance," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 167-180.
    3. Kurosaki, Takashi & Khan, Hidayat Ullah, 2011. "Vulnerability of Microfinance to Strategic Default and Covariate Shocks:Evidence from Pakistan," PRIMCED Discussion Paper Series 10, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Habimana, Dominique & Haughton, Jonathan, 2022. "Does Rwanda’s flagship microcredit programme boost agriculture and incomes?," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(3), September.
    5. Shyamal Chowdhury & Prabal Roy Chowdhury & Kunal Sengupta, 2014. "Sequential lending with dynamic joint liability in micro-finance," Discussion Papers 14-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    6. repec:cep:stieop:44 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lutz G. Arnold & Johannes Reeder & Susanne Steger, 2013. "On the Viability of Group Lending when Microfinance Meets the Market," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 12(1), pages 59-106, April.
    8. Ghulam Hussain, A.K.M. & Nargis, Nigar & Ashiquzzaman, S.M. & Khalil, Fahad, 2019. "The employment impact of microcredit program participation in Bangladesh: Evidence from a longitudinal household survey," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 34-49.
    9. Harish Kamath & Noor Firdoos Jahan, 2020. "Using Hidden Markov Model to Monitor Possible Loan Defaults in Banks," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 1097-1107.
    10. Emily Breza & Cynthia Kinnan, 2021. "Measuring the Equilibrium Impacts of Credit: Evidence from the Indian Microfinance Crisis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(3), pages 1447-1497.
    11. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    12. Yanwen Wang & Chunhua Wu & Ting Zhu, 2019. "Mobile Hailing Technology and Taxi Driving Behaviors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 734-755, September.
    13. Asadul Islam, 2011. "Medium- and Long-Term Participation in Microcredit: An Evaluation Using a New Panel Dataset from Bangladesh," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(3), pages 843-862.
    14. Francesca Bassi & Fulvia Pennoni & Luca Rossetto, 2020. "The Italian market of sparkling wines: Latent variable models for brand positioning, customer loyalty, and transitions across brands' preferences," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 542-567, October.
    15. Kamel Bel Hadj Miled & Moheddine Younsi & Monia Landolsi, 2022. "Does microfinance program innovation reduce income inequality? Cross-country and panel data analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Arun Gopalakrishnan & Zhenling Jiang & Yulia Nevskaya & Raphael Thomadsen, 2021. "Can Non-tiered Customer Loyalty Programs Be Profitable?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 508-526, May.
    17. Durango-Cohen, Elizabeth J., 2013. "Modeling contribution behavior in fundraising: Segmentation analysis for a public broadcasting station," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 538-551.
    18. Bernhard Baumgartner & Daniel Guhl & Thomas Kneib & Winfried J. Steiner, 2018. "Flexible estimation of time-varying effects for frequently purchased retail goods: a modeling approach based on household panel data," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(4), pages 837-873, October.
    19. Kinshuk Jerath & Anuj Kumar & Serguei Netessine, 2015. "An Information Stock Model of Customer Behavior in Multichannel Customer Support Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 368-383, July.
    20. Ojo, Marianne, 2013. "Role of regulation in micro finance: jurisdictional analysis," MPRA Paper 49927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Merrey, D. J. & Lefore, Nicole, 2018. "Improving the availability and effectiveness of rural and “Micro” finance for small-scale irrigation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of lessons learned," IWMI Working Papers H049027, International Water Management Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kbawps:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.kba.co.ke/about_research_center.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.