IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hbsfof/323581.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kontrollaversion und Entlastungsoptimismus in vernetzten Kliniken: Autonomie und Mitbestimmung in der akutstationären Pflege angesichts von Digitalisierung und Teilautomatisierung

Author

Listed:
  • Bringmann, Julia
  • Petersen, Benjamin Henry
  • Staab, Philipp

Abstract

Wie verändern datenintensive Softwaresysteme die Arbeit in der Pflege? Die Studie "Kontrollaversion und Entlastungsoptimismus in vernetzten Kliniken" untersucht, wie sich Digitalisierung und Teilautomatisierung auf die Autonomie von Pflegekräften und die betriebliche Mitbestimmung auswirken. Die Ergebnisse zeigen: Trotz erweiterter technischer Kontrollmöglichkeiten bleibt die Handlungsfreiheit der Pflegekräfte weitgehend erhalten. Ausgehend von einer institutionalisierten und betrieblich gelebten Kontrollaversion eröffnen sich für die Mitbestimmung neue Handlungsspielräume, deren gemeinsamer Fluchtpunkt die Entlastung der Pflegekräfte durch die digitalisierungsinduzierte Optimierung des Arbeitsprozesses ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Bringmann, Julia & Petersen, Benjamin Henry & Staab, Philipp, 2025. "Kontrollaversion und Entlastungsoptimismus in vernetzten Kliniken: Autonomie und Mitbestimmung in der akutstationären Pflege angesichts von Digitalisierung und Teilautomatisierung," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 374, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:323581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/323581/1/1932702296.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon C. Bolton, 2004. "A Simple Matter of Control? NHS Hospital Nurses and New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 317-333, March.
    2. Funder, Maria, 2018. "Quo vadis Betriebsrat? Entwicklungstrends der betrieblichen Mitbestimmung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 71(6), pages 497-504.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Les Worrall & Kim Mather & Roger Seifert, 2010. "Solving the Labour Problem Among Professional Workers in the UK Public Sector: Organisation Change and Performance Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-137, June.
    2. Haipeter, Thomas & Bosch, Gerhard & Schmitz-Kießler, Jutta & Spallek, Anne-Christin, 2019. "Neue Mitbestimmungspraktiken in der digitalen Transformation der "Industrie 4.0": Befunde aus dem gewerkschaftlichen Projekt "Arbeit 2020 in NRW" [New Patterns of Codeterminatio," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(2), pages 130-149.
    3. Elizabeth Goodrick & Trish Reay, 2010. "Florence Nightingale Endures: Legitimizing a New Professional Role Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 55-84, January.
    4. Diane van den Broek, 2017. "Perforated body work: the case of tele-nursing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(6), pages 904-920, December.
    5. McDonald, Ruth & Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh & Bayes, Sara & Morriss, Richard & Kai, Joe, 2013. "Competing and coexisting logics in the changing field of English general medical practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 47-54.
    6. Mitsch, Frieder & Hassel, Anke & Soskice, David, 2024. "Southern Germany’s innovation clusters: regional growth coalitions in the knowledge economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126264, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Walter, Lars & Styhre, Alexander, 2020. "Nursing, bedside care, and the organization of expert knowledge: Professional work as agencement," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    8. Ian Clark, 2014. "Health-care assistants, aspiration, frustration and job satisfaction in the workplace," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 300-312, July.
    9. Gill Kirton & Cécile Guillaume, 2019. "When Welfare Professionals Encounter Restructuring and Privatization: The Inside Story of the Probation Service of England and Wales," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(6), pages 929-947, December.
    10. Nick Jephson & Hugh Cook & Andy Charlwood, 2024. "Prisoners of oath: Junior doctors’ professional identities during and after industrial action," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 556-578, May.
    11. Finn, Rachael & Learmonth, Mark & Reedy, Patrick, 2010. "Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1148-1154, April.
    12. Sharon C. Bolton, 2009. "Getting to the heart of the emotional labour process: a reply to Brook," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 549-560, September.
    13. Hemantika Basu, 2019. "Mode of Work Organization in Nursing: Management Practices in Private Healthcare in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(4), pages 433-454, November.
    14. Ademola B. Owolabi, 2012. "Effect of Organizational Justice and Organizational Environment on Turn-Over Intention of Health Workers in Ekiti State, Nigeria," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 28-34, March.
    15. Thomas Andersson & Stefan Tengblad, 2009. "When complexity meets culture: new public management and the Swedish police," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 41-56, March.
    16. Omidi, Afshin & Dal Zotto, Cinzia & Gandini, Alessandro, 2023. "Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 899-913.
    17. Sharon C. Bolton & Maeve Houlihan, 2009. "Beyond the control‐resistance debate," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 5-13, March.
    18. Canet Tuba Sarıtaş, 2020. "Precarious contours of work–family conflict: The case of nurses in Turkey," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 59-75, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:323581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.