IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/342410.html

Documentaries as Data and Dialogue: A Critical Assessment of Research and Teaching Potential in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Niftiyev, Ibrahim

Abstract

Economics education and research have long relied on formal quantitative methods and abstract theoretical models. This approach creates a gap between textbook material and actual economic life. This discussion paper makes the case for documentary film as a valuable secondary methodological tool and pedagogical technique to help bridge this gap. Although mathematical models, statistics, and econometrics play an invaluable role in economic research, it is impossible to fully incorporate the institutional, historical, cultural, and behavioral factors that drive economic events into such models. Similarly, many students struggle to connect abstract notions such as inflation, market failures, externalities, foreign direct investment (FDI), and inequality to their everyday realities. Drawing on evidence from several research projects and classroom experiments, I argue that documentary films offer a way to ground economic theory in reality through specific examples, narratives, experiences, and perspectives. In economic research, documentary films provide in-depth qualitative case evidence that can be systematically analyzed using established methods such as thematic analysis (TA), grounded theory, qualitative coding, and structured note-taking. Pedagogically, documentaries can promote interactive classroom discussions, foster critical thinking, and enhance student interest by bringing academic learning into real-world contexts. They demonstrate the versatility of documentary films as a data source for analyzing dispersed and international economic transactions, such as heterogeneous externalities associated with FDI. Despite potential issues such as narrative bias and the need for methodologically sound implementation of a film-based approach, documentary films serve as a useful complement when other quantitative data sources fall short or when context is crucial. Overall, this paper calls for greater methodological openness in economics by exploring the use of documentary films in research and in the classroom.

Suggested Citation

  • Niftiyev, Ibrahim, 2026. "Documentaries as Data and Dialogue: A Critical Assessment of Research and Teaching Potential in Economics," EconStor Preprints 342410, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:342410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342410/1/Discussion-paper-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/67ft27s7u58ocangahl1jigu6p is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "La superioridad de los economistas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 17(33), pages 13-43, July-Dece.
    3. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 89-114, Winter.
    4. repec:nos:voprec:y:2015:id:94 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. M. Fourcade & E. Ollion & Y. Algan., 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Baccini & Lucio Barabesi & Carlo Debernardi, 2025. "Exploring the Shape of Economics: A Multilayer Network Analysis of Social Communities and Intellectual Similarity Among Journals Before and After the 2008 Financial Crisis," Papers 2508.09079, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    2. Angela Ambrosino & Mario Cedrini & John B. Davis, 2024. "Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 59-76, January.
    3. Lorenzo Ductor & Bauke Visser, 2023. "Concentration of power at the editorial boards of economics journals," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 189-238, April.
    4. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2025. "Inter- and intra-domain knowledge flows: Examining their relationship with impact at the field level over time," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    5. Michelle Monique Meixieira Groenewald & Caro Carl Janse van Rensburg, 2025. "Toward Decolonizing and Feminist Pedagogies in Transforming Economics Classrooms," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 610-630, September.
    6. Edilberto Rodríguez Araújo, 2022. "Los contornos de la ensenanza de las ciencias económicas en la región oriental de Colombia," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 41(74), pages 275-298.
    7. Oded Shenkar, 2025. "Towards interdisciplinarity in international business: national culture as an example," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(5), pages 559-566, July.
    8. Martina Cioni & Giovanni Federico & Michelangelo Vasta, 2023. "Is economic history changing its nature? Evidence from top journals," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 17(1), pages 23-48, January.
    9. Petar Sorić & Ivana Lolić & Marina Matošec, 2023. "The persistence of economic sentiment: a trip down memory lane," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(2), pages 371-395, April.
    10. Frank Bailly, 2022. "When mainstream economics does human resource management: a critique of personnel economics' prescriptive ambition," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(301), pages 103-117.
    11. Adams, Renée B. & Xu, Jing, 2026. "Sex, science, and society," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    12. Alexandre Truc, 2025. "The Disciplinary Mobility of Core Behavioral Economists [La mobilité disciplinaire des chercheurs au cœur de l’économie comportementale]," Post-Print hal-05543132, HAL.
    13. Ductor, Lorenzo & Visser, Bauke, 2022. "When a coauthor joins an editorial board," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 576-595.
    14. Buchner, Martin & Rose, Julian & Johannesson, Magnus & Malan, Mandy & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2025. "Seeking Scientific Consensus - An Expert Survey on the Replication Debate between Acemoglu et al. (2001) and Albouy (2012)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 270, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    15. Lee, Deok-Young & Woo, Hyungsoo & Yang, Jae-Suk, 2026. "Networks of knowledge: hiring and collaboration networks in economics and physics departments," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1).
    16. Audrey Amrein‐Beardsley, 2022. "“What Should The Future Of Educational Accountability Look Like?”: A Response To Brian Gill," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 1240-1242, September.
    17. Petar Sorić & Blanka Škrabić Perić & Marina Matošec, 2022. "Breaking new grounds: a fresh insight into the leading properties of business and consumer survey indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4511-4535, December.
    18. Sokolov, M., 2025. "Russian academic economists: A socio-demographic profile of an academic profession," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 68(3), pages 145-158.
    19. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2023. "The Economics of Wellbeing and Psychology: An Historical and Methodological Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 117891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Deyo, Darwyyn, 2025. "Recovering history: Using the Nobel lectures to identify hidden women in economic thought," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • C89 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:342410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.