IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esconf/343410.html

The Role of Green Public Spending in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Selected European Countries: Aligning Regional and Local Budgets with Green Objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrić, Muhamed
  • Kozarević, Emira
  • Kokorović Jukan, Meldina
  • Kešetović, Izudin

Abstract

Rising environmental degradation and increasing public awareness have prompted countries to adopt policies to reduce ecological damage. Global warming, climate change, and biodiversity loss pose serious economic and social challenges. At the same time, CO₂ emissions continue to rise, particularly in developing countries like Bosnia and Herzegovina, which faces limited institutional capacity. Transitioning toward net-zero emissions by mid-century is essential to prevent irreversible climate risks. Energy efficiency improvements in energy-intensive sectors are central to mitigation efforts. However, financial constraints limit the widespread adoption of sustainable practices. Private initiatives alone are insufficient, highlighting the importance of public investment in green infrastructure at regional and local levels, filling gaps in private capital and stimulating further private-sector engagement. This paper examines the impact of public spending on environmental protection activities - including waste and wastewater management, pollution abatement, biodiversity and landscape preservation, and ecological R&D - on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using panel data for EU member states and Bosnia and Herzegovina over 2014-2022, we employ regression models, specifically pooled Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Fixed Effects (FE), and Random Effects (RE). Lagged effects are also considered, recognising that the benefits of public spending may materialise over time. The findings provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of fiscal instruments in mitigating environmental degradation and offer insights for aligning regional and local budgets with the EU's and the Western Balkans' long-term climate neutrality objectives. This research further contributes to the limited empirical literature on the role of fiscal policy in reducing GHG emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrić, Muhamed & Kozarević, Emira & Kokorović Jukan, Meldina & Kešetović, Izudin, 2025. "The Role of Green Public Spending in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Selected European Countries: Aligning Regional and Local Budgets with Green Objectives," EconStor Conference Papers 343410, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:343410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343410/1/ABS31-Corrected.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. López, Ramón & Galinato, Gregmar I. & Islam, Asif, 2011. "Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 180-198, September.
    2. Sharma, Susan Sunila, 2011. "Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from 69 countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 376-382, January.
    3. Niu, Bingcheng, 2024. "Government environmental protection expenditure and national ESG performance: Global evidence," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    4. Fang, Guochang & Chen, Gang & Yang, Kun & Yin, Weijun & Tian, Lixin, 2024. "How does green fiscal expenditure promote green total factor energy efficiency? — Evidence from Chinese 254 cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    5. Halkos, George E. & Paizanos, Epameinondas Α., 2013. "The effect of government expenditure on the environment:An empirical investigation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 48-56.
    6. Alan Barrell & Pawel Dobrzanski & Sebastian Bobowski & Krzysztof Siuda & Szymon Chmielowiec, 2021. "Efficiency of Environmental Protection Expenditures in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-35, December.
    7. Astrida Miceikienė & Kristina Gesevičienė & Daiva Rimkuvienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Dependence of GHG Emissions on the Support and Taxes in the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    9. Soytas, Ugur & Sari, Ramazan, 2009. "Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1667-1675, April.
    10. Thomas Bernauer & Vally Koubi, 2013. "Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 593-609, September.
    11. Bruce Morley, 2012. "Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(18), pages 1817-1820, December.
    12. Xi Chen & Zhigang Chen, 2021. "Can Green Finance Development Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Evidence from 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serdar Yilmaz, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Adewuyi, Adeolu O., 2016. "Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 489-506.
    3. Chan, Ying Tung, 2020. "Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Chun-Ping Chang & Minyi Dong & Jiliang Liu, 2019. "Environmental Governance and Environmental Performance," ADBI Working Papers 936, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    5. Lu, Hongyou & Xu, Wenli & Xu, Kun, 2016. "How to Make The Fiscal policies Greener in China?——Based on The Perspective of Environmental Macroeconomics," MPRA Paper 70221, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ren Yishuai & Jiang Yong & Ma Chaoqun & Liu Jianglong & Chen Jing, 2021. "Will Tax Burden Be a Stumbling Block to Carbon-Emission Reduction? Evidence from OECD Countries," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 335-355, August.
    7. Halkos, George E. & Paizanos, Epameinondas Α., 2016. "The effects of fiscal policy on CO2 emissions: Evidence from the U.S.A," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 317-328.
    8. Halkos, George & Paizanos, Epameinondas, 2015. "Environmental Macroeconomics: A critical literature review and future empirical research directions," MPRA Paper 67432, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Ivan Hajdukovic, 2021. "Interactions among macroeconomic policies, the energy market and environmental quality," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 861-913, October.
    10. Hassan F. Gholipour & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2018. "Institutions and the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection: evidence from Middle Eastern countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 20-39, March.
    11. Chun-Ping Chang & Minyi Dong & Jiliang Liu, 2019. "Environmental Governance and Environmental Performance," Working Papers id:13023, eSocialSciences.
    12. Wanfang Xiong & Yan Han & M. James C. Crabbe & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2020. "Fiscal Expenditures on Science and Technology and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Bazyli Czyżewski & Anna Matuszczak & Łukasz Kryszak & Andrzej Czyżewski, 2019. "Efficiency of the EU Environmental Policy in Struggling with Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ): How Agriculture Makes a Difference?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Saffet Akdag & Hakan Yildirim & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2025. "Comparative benefits of environmental protection expenditures and environmental taxes in driving environmental quality of the European countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 2188-2203, August.
    15. Stefano Di Bucchianico & Mario di Serio & Matteo Fragetta & Mr. Giovanni Melina, 2025. "Time-Varying Impacts of Government Spending on CO2 Emissions," IMF Working Papers 2025/132, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Fu, Haoliang & Guo, Wenwei & Sun, Zheng & Xia, Ting, 2023. "Asymmetric impact of natural resources rent, monetary and fiscal policies on environmental sustainability in BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Ramlogan, Avinash & Nelson, Andell, 2024. "Assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon dioxide emissions," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 5(3).
    18. Van Bon Nguyen, 2024. "Does governance contribute to the public spending - CO2 emissions nexus in developing economies? Policy lessons for sustainable development," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 48(1), pages 79-101.
    19. Alotaish Mohammed Saud M. & Ping Guo & Ihtisham ul Haq & Guoqin Pan & Alam Khan, 2019. "Do government expenditure and financial development impede environmental degradation in Venezuela?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Md. Saiful Islam & Sk Habibur Rahaman, 2025. "Does Economic Policy Impact the Environment in South Asia? The Role of Disaggregated Energy Consumption in an EKC Framework," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10967-10991, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:343410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.