IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper

Der öffentlich-rechtliche Rundfunk in Deutschland: Bedeutung, Finanzierung und Reformoptionen

  • Herrmann, Karolin

Der öffentlich-rechtliche Rundfunk stößt in seiner gewachsenen Dimension und reformierten Finanzierungsform auf zunehmende Akzeptanzprobleme. Im Unterschied zu den privaten finanzieren sich die öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanbieter vorwiegend über Zwangsentgelte, also Rundfunkgebühren bzw. -beiträge. Ordnungspolitisch und auch technisch ist es grundsätzlich nicht zwingend, öffentlich-rechtliche Sendeangebote in der derzeitigen Breite per Zwangsabgaben durchzusetzen. Dem steht der vom Bundesverfassungsgericht vor Jahrzehnten skizzierte Grundversorgungsauftrag derzeit noch entgegen. Die DSi-Sonderinformation Nummer 1 untersucht, welche Reformen unter den gegebenen rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen anzustreben sind.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by DSi - Deutsches Steuerzahlerinstitut des Bundes der Steuerzahler e.V., Berlin in its series DSi-Sonderinformationen with number 1.

in new window

Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:dsison:1
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Französische Str. 9-12, 10117 Berlin

Phone: 030 / 25 93 96 32
Fax: 030 / 25 93 96 13
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:dsison:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.