IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cfrwps/340841.html

The green bond premium: Evidence from a multiverse analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bauckloh, Michael Tobias
  • Kirsch, Paula

Abstract

We study the green bond premium, defined as the yield differential between green and matched conventional bonds in the secondary market. Existing estimates vary widely, raising questions about their robustness. We address this by estimating the premium across more than 500,000 empirical designs spanning common sample and methodological choices. In this multiverse setting, the average premium is -2.59 basis points. It varies systematically with sample composition, with more negative values for municipal bonds, and becomes more negative during periods of heightened climate attention. Finally, we investigate which choices drive variation in premium estimates. We find that it is driven primarily by issuer type and matching choices, while other choices, such as liquidity adjustment, contribute little to overall variation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bauckloh, Michael Tobias & Kirsch, Paula, 2026. "The green bond premium: Evidence from a multiverse analysis," CFR Working Papers 26-06, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cfrwps:340841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/340841/1/1969830476.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Karpf & Antoine Mandel, 2018. "The changing value of the ‘green’ label on the US municipal bond market," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 161-165, February.
    2. Gregor Dorfleitner & Sebastian Utz & Rongxin Zhang, 2022. "The pricing of green bonds: external reviews and the shades of green," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 797-834, April.
    3. Hachenberg, B. & Schiereck, D., 2018. "Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 109709, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Madurika Nanayakkara & Sisira Colombage, 2019. "Do investors in Green Bond market pay a premium? Global evidence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(40), pages 4425-4437, August.
    5. Dick-Nielsen, Jens & Feldhütter, Peter & Lando, David, 2012. "Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 471-492.
    6. David Ardia & Keven Bluteau & Kris Boudt & Koen Inghelbrecht, 2023. "Climate Change Concerns and the Performance of Green vs. Brown Stocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7607-7632, December.
    7. Merli, Maxime & Petey, Joël & Roger, Tristan, 2025. "Climate concerns, salient events, and green preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Dragotto, Massimo & Dufour, Alfonso & Varotto, Simone, 2025. "Greenium fluctuations and climate awareness in the corporate bond market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Moritz Immel & Britta Hachenberg & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2022. "Green Bonds: Shades of Green and Brown," Springer Books, in: Marielle de Jong & Dan diBartolomeo (ed.), Risks Related to Environmental, Social and Governmental Issues (ESG), pages 21-34, Springer.
    10. Maria Jua Bachelet & Leonardo Becchetti & Stefano Manfredonia, 2019. "The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Britta Hachenberg & Dirk Schiereck, 2018. "Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 371-383, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nevatia, Vedanshi, 2026. "Sovereign green bonds: Risk-mitigating sustainability instruments in emerging markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Caramichael, John & Rapp, Andreas C., 2024. "The green corporate bond issuance premium," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Hu, Xin & Zhu, Bo & Lin, Renda & Li, Xiru & Zeng, Lidan & Zhou, Sitong, 2024. "How does greenness translate into greenium? Evidence from China's green bonds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Hinsche, Isabelle Cathérine, 2021. "A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers," CFS Working Paper Series 663, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    5. Shivam Azad & S L Tulasi Devi & Anand Kumar Mishra, 2024. "Investing in our planet: Examining retail investors' preference for green bond investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5151-5173, September.
    6. Jankovic, Irena & Vasic, Vladimir & Kovacevic, Vlado, 2022. "Does transparency matter? Evidence from panel analysis of the EU government green bonds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Eckberg, Jens & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Greenness ratings and green bond liquidity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    8. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M.Ángeles & Caby, Jérôme & Šević, Aleksandar, 2021. "The influence of investor sentiment on the green bond market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Kristin Ulrike Löffler & Aleksandar Petreski & Andreas Stephan, 2021. "Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the “greenium”," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Koziol, Christian & Proelss, Juliane & Roßmann, Philipp & Schweizer, Denis, 2022. "The price of being green," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Simeth, Nagihan, 2022. "The value of external reviews in the secondary green bond market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    12. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Emre Arat & Britta Hachenberg & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 547-557, December.
    14. Maria Jua Bachelet & Leonardo Becchetti & Stefano Manfredonia, 2019. "The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Dahlen, Niklas & Fehrenkötter, Rieke & Schreiter, Maximilian, 2024. "The new bond on the block — Designing a carbon-linked bond for sustainable investment projects," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 316-325.
    16. Fauß, Tobias Friedrich, 2022. "Analysis of Green Bonds," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(3), pages 668-689.
    17. Bi, Shenghao & Appolloni, Andrea & Zhang, Wanying & Yan, Zhenjun & Du, Jiang, 2026. "Impact of green bond issuance on energy intensity: Evidence from new energy enterprises," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Kang, Sang Baum & Sinha, Satwik & Eom, Jiyong, 2025. "Green dreams, risky assets? A study of high-yield green bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Huang, Chih-Yueh & Dekker, David & Christopoulos, Dimitrios, 2023. "Rethinking greenium: A quadratic function of yield spread," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Karel Janda & Binyi Zhang, 2021. "Attractiveness of Chinese Bonds Financing Climate and Environmental Projects," FFA Working Papers 4.007, Prague University of Economics and Business, revised 26 Apr 2022.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cfrwps:340841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfkoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.