IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cessdp/65.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreign direct investment inflows and labor productivity in Pakistan: A sector-wise panel cointegration analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Serfraz, Ayesha

Abstract

Developing economies tremendously benefit from FDI inflows since it leads to their economic growth. This study empirically analyzes the effects of sector-wise FDI inflows on respective sector-wise labor productivity for a panel of seven major sectors of Pakistan's economy covering time period of 1997-2016. In empirical analysis sector-wise FDI inflows has been used as an independent variable while sector-wise labor productivity is a dependent variable. Initial tests conclude that LSDV fixed effects model is the most appropriate test for the data being used for empirical analysis. Further tests confirm the existence of a long run Cointegration between these two variables. Wald test shows that a uni-directional short-run causality exists, running from sector-wise labor productivity to sector-wise FDI inflows. Pair-wise Granger-Causality test further shows that the effects of FDI inflows are not limited to one sector, rather there is an evidence of spillover effect from one sector to an-other. All empirical tests conclude that sector-wise FDI inflows positively affect sector-wise labor productivity in case of Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Serfraz, Ayesha, 2017. "Foreign direct investment inflows and labor productivity in Pakistan: A sector-wise panel cointegration analysis," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 65, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cessdp:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168558/1/897252470.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Bijsterbosch & Marcin Kolasa, 2010. "FDI and productivity convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: an industry-level investigation," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 689-712, January.
    2. Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Lili Yan Ing & Shujiro Urata, . "Services Productivity and Trade Openness: Case of ASEAN," Chapters, in: Lili Yan Ing (ed.), East Asian Integration (First Edition), chapter 7, pages 195-222, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    3. M. Tahir Suleman, Muhammad Talha Amin, 2015. "The Impact of Sectoral Foreign Direct Investment on Industrial Economic Growth of Pakistan," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 2(1), pages 151-165, March.
    4. M. Tahir Suleman & M. Talha Amin, 2015. "The Impact of Sectoral Foreign Direct Investment on Industrial Economic Growth of Pakistan," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 2(1), pages 102-123, March.
    5. Serfraz, Ayesha, 2017. "Analyzing short-run and long-run causality between FDI flows, labour productivity and education in Pakistan," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 61, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    6. Vu, Tam Bang & Noy, Ilan, 2009. "Sectoral analysis of foreign direct investment and growth in the developed countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 402-413, April.
    7. Le Thanh THUY, 2007. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Have an Impact on the Growth in Labor Productivity of Vietnamese Domestic Firms?," Discussion papers 07021, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Msuya, Elibariki, 2007. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty Reduction in Tanzania," MPRA Paper 3671, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Muhammad Arshad Khan & Shujaat Ali Khan, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Pakistan: A Sectoral Analysis," PIDE-Working Papers 2011:67, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    10. Silvio Contessi & Ariel Weinberger, 2009. "Foreign direct investment, productivity, and country growth: an overview," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 91(Mar), pages 61-78.
    11. Rabeh Morrar & Faïz Gallouj, 2016. "The growth of the service sector in Palestine: the productivity challenge," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 179-204.
    12. Carmen Fillat & Julia Woerz, 2011. "Good or bad? The influence of FDI on productivity growth. An industry-level analysis," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 293-328.
    13. Asad Alam & Paloma Anós Casero & Faruk Khan & Charles Udomsaph, 2008. "Unleashing Prosperity : Productivity Growth in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6588, December.
    14. Jagannath Mallick, 2015. "Globalisation, Structural Change and Labour Productivity Growth in BRICS Economy," FIW Working Paper series 141, FIW.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Tehseen Jawaid & Abdul Waheed, 2017. "Contribution of International Trade in Human Development of Pakistan," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1155-1177, October.
    2. Shimaa Elkomy & Hilary Clistina Ingham & Robert Allan Read, 2018. "Heterogeneous Sectoral Growth Effects of FDI in Egypt," Working Papers 238221684, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    3. Muhammad Imran & An HuSen & Muhammad Kaleem & Arshad Khan Bangash & Nizam Ud Din & Sobia, 2020. "Effect of regional factor productivity on manufacturing sector: The case of Sino-Pak economic ties," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Bakari, Sayef & El Weriemmi, Malek, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Agricultural Investment on Economic Growth in France," MPRA Paper 113970, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Aleksandra Parteka, 2013. "The Role of Trade in Intra-Industry Productivity Growth—the Case of Old and New European Union Countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(4), pages 712-731, November.
    6. Ashima Arora & Anjala Kalsie, 2018. "Impact of US Financial Crisis on GDP of BRICS Economies: An Analysis Using Panel Data Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 439-454, April.
    7. Lv, Ping & Curran, Louise & Spigarelli, Francesca & Barbieri, Elisa, 2021. "One country, many industries: Heterogeneity of Chinese OFDI motivations at meso level," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Marcin Grela & Aleksandra Majchrowska & Tomasz Michałek & Jakub Mućk & Agnieszka Stążka-Gawrysiak & Grzegorz Tchorek & Marcin Wagner, 2017. "Is Central and Eastern Europe converging towards the EU-15?," NBP Working Papers 264, Narodowy Bank Polski.
    9. Raza, Syed Ali & Sabir, Muhammad Sarwar & Mehboob, Farhan, 2011. "Capital inflows and economic growth in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 36790, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Roberto Ganau, 2022. "Institutions and the productivity challenge for European regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25.
    11. Ram Upendra Das, 2015. "Trade and Investment Liberalization in India: Implications for Productivity Gains," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Khee Giap Tan & Kong Yam Tan (ed.), Foreign Direct Investment and Small and Medium Enterprises Productivity and Access to Finance, chapter 3, pages 35-55, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Svilena MIHAYLOVA, 2015. "Foreign direct investment and income inequality in Central and Eastern Europe," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(603), S), pages 23-42, Summer.
    13. Martin Grančay, 2012. "Recenzia - Paul Krugman, Maurice Obstfeld a Marc Melitz - International economics, theory and policy (9. vydanie)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 10(2), pages 147-148.
    14. Naqeeb Ur Rehman, 2017. "Self-selection and learning-by-exporting hypotheses: micro-level evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(1), pages 133-160, April.
    15. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2013. "The Impact of Trade Integration with the European Union on Productivity in a Posttransition Economy: The Case of Polish Manufacturing Sectors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 84-104, March.
    16. Zaid Ashiq Khan & Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar & Noshaba Aziz & Uzair Ali & Liu Tianjun, 2020. "Revisiting the effects of relevant factors on Pakistan's agricultural products export," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(12), pages 527-541.
    17. Krzysztof Jasiecki, 2008. "The changing roles of the post-transitional economic elite in Poland," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 13(4), pages 327-359.
    18. Marialisa Motta & Ana Maria Oviedo & Massimiliano Santini, 2010. "An Open Door for Firms," World Bank Publications - Reports 11086, The World Bank Group.
    19. Sepehrdoust, Hamid & Zamani Shabkhaneh, Saber, 2018. "How knowledge base factors change natural resource curse to economic growth?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 149-154.
    20. Lobanov, M. & Zvezdanovic Lobanova, J. & Zvezdanovic, M., 2022. "Typologization of industrial systems in the countries of Central-Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 56(4), pages 92-122.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sector-wise FDI Inflows; Sectors-wise labor Productivity; Panel Cointegration; Pakistan;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cessdp:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zohamde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.