IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/arqudp/230.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grundsteuerreform und Gleichmäßigkeit der Besteuerung

Author

Listed:
  • Maiterth, Ralf
  • Lutz, Maximilian

Abstract

Die Grundsteuer muss aufgrund höchstrichterlicher Rechtsprechung reformiert werden, da die veralteten Einheitswerte dem Gebot einer gleichmäßigen Besteuerung nicht genügen. Aufgrund der rund 35 Mio. zu bewertenden Grundstücke sind einfache standardisierte Bewertungsverfahren unerlässlich. Jedoch sind die vor allem mit dem Argument der Einfachheit ins Spiel gebrachten flächenorientierten Verfahren nicht geeignet, die Einheitsbewertung abzulösen, da sie ähnlich eklatant wie die Einheitsbewertung gegen das Gebot der Gleichmäßigkeit der Besteuerung verstoßen. Deutlich besser schneiden einfach gestaltete wertorientierte Verfahren ab, die jedoch grundstücksartabhängig ausgestaltet werden müssen. Bei vermieteten Grundstücken (Mietwohngrundstücken) bewirkt das Abstellen auf Mietwerte (Mietwertmodell) die besten Bewertungsergebnisse. Bei selbstgenutzten Immobilien (Ein- und Zweifamilienhäuser) führt das erbschaftsteuerliche Vergleichswertverfahren zu den besten Ergebnissen. Jedoch kann dieses Verfahren auf eine Vielzahl von Ein- und Zweifamilienhäuser nicht angewendet werden, so dass hierfür ein Ersatzverfahren notwendig ist. Hier bietet sich, der Not eines einfach zu handhabenden Verfahrens gehorchend, das Kostenwertmodell an. Aber selbst bei den am besten wirkenden Verfahren streuen die Bewertungsergebnisse merklich. Selbst Fehlbewertungen von mehr als 35% sind in zahlreichen Fällen hinzunehmen. Andernfalls muss auf die Erhebung einer Grundsteuer verzichtet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Maiterth, Ralf & Lutz, Maximilian, 2018. "Grundsteuerreform und Gleichmäßigkeit der Besteuerung," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 230, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/183587/1/103297950X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homburg, Stefan, 2018. "Ein Vorschlag zur Grundsteuerreform," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-629, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    2. Wolfram F. Richter, 2016. "Reform der Grundsteuer: Ein Plädoyer für eine wertorientierte und gleichmäßige Besteuerung von Boden und Gebäuden," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(22), pages 22-25, November.
    3. Stefan Bach, 2018. "Grundsteuerreform: Aufwändige Neubewertung oder pragmatische Alternativen," DIW aktuell 9, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    5. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74, pages 132-132.
    6. Henger, Ralph & Schaefer, Thilo, 2015. "Mehr Boden für die Grundsteuer: Eine Simulationsanalyse verschiedener Grundsteuermodelle," IW policy papers 32/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trojanek, Radoslaw & Huderek-Glapska, Sonia, 2018. "Measuring the noise cost of aviation – The association between the Limited Use Area around Warsaw Chopin Airport and property values," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 103-114.
    2. Shimizu, Chihiro, 2014. "How Are Property Investment Returns Determined? : Estimating the Micro-Structure of Asset Prices, Property Income, and Discount Rates," HIT-REFINED Working Paper Series 12, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Dan Horsky & Sanjog Misra & Paul Nelson, 2006. "Observed and Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Brand-Choice Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 322-335, 07-08.
    4. Ilir Nase & Jim Berry & Alastair Adair, 2016. "Impact of quality-led design on real estate value: a spatiotemporal analysis of city centre apartments," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 309-331, October.
    5. Laura Blow & Martin Browning & Ian Crawford, 2004. "Nonparametric methods for the characteristic model," CeMMAP working papers 18/04, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    7. Frondel, Manuel & Kussel, Gerhard & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2019. "Local cost for global benefit: The case of wind turbines," Ruhr Economic Papers 791, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen, revised 2019.
    8. Brockmeier, M., 1991. "Entwicklung und Aufhebung von Reinheitsgeboten im Nahrungsmittelbereich – Analyse und Bewertung," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 27.
    9. Erica L. Groshen & Brian C. Moyer & Ana M. Aizcorbe & Ralph Bradley & David M. Friedman, 2017. "How Government Statistics Adjust for Potential Biases from Quality Change and New Goods in an Age of Digital Technologies: A View from the Trenches," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 187-210, Spring.
    10. Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2009. "Impacts of an Iron and Steel Plant on Residential Property Values," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1421-1436, September.
    11. Can Zou & Jun Tai & Li Chen & Yue Che, 2020. "An Environmental Justice Assessment of the Waste Treatment Facilities in Shanghai: Incorporating Counterfactual Decomposition into the Hedonic Price Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Ming Li & Guojun Zhang & Yunliang Chen & Chunshan Zhou, 2019. "Evaluation of Residential Housing Prices on the Internet: Data Pitfalls," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, February.
    13. Buller, Virginia & Hudson, Darren & Parkhurst, Gregory M. & Whittington, Andrew, 2006. "The Impact of Hunting Package Attributes on Hunting Package Prices in Mississippi," Research Reports 15798, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    14. Matthias Staudigel & Aleksej Trubnikov, 2022. "High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 309-334, April.
    15. Smed, Sinne & Hansen, Lars Garn, 2018. "Consumer Valuation of Health Attributes in Food," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), May.
    16. Schilling, Brian J. & Sullivan, Kevin P. & Duke, Joshua M., 2013. "Do Residual Development Options Increase Preserved Farmland Values?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-17.
    17. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2018. "도이모이 이후 베트남의 주거 이동, 선택, 가격 결정요인 연구: 호치민시 사례 중심으로," OSF Preprints 6kdfy, Center for Open Science.
    18. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Lusk, Jayson & Magnier, Alexandre, 2018. "The price of non-genetically modified (non-GM) food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-50.
    19. Girma T. Kassie & Awudu Abdulai & Clemens Wollny, 2009. "Valuing Traits of Indigenous Cows in Central Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 386-401, June.
    20. Sanglim Yoo & John E. Wagner, 2016. "A review of the hedonic literatures in environmental amenities from open space: a traditional econometric vs. spatial econometric model," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 141-166, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Grundsteuerreform; Grundstücksbewertung;

    JEL classification:

    • H29 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.arqus.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.