IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Relationship between Consumption, Income and Wealth in Hong Kong

  • Joanne Cutler

    (Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research)

Registered author(s):

    The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, to try to estimate a consumption function for Hong Kong along the lines of the standard Life- Cycle Model formulated by Ando and Modigliani (1963). Second, to use the estimated relationship to quantify the effect on consumption from the sharp fall in property prices since 1997. Estimating a consumption function for Hong Kong is not a straightforward exercise given the lack of official quarterly estimates of household sector income and wealth. The paper reports the results of empirical tests between alternative proxies for aggregate labour income which are derived from estimates of average pay and employment, and employs a new series developed by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority for private sector housing wealth. We find a stable relationship between consumption, labour income and wealth in Hong Kong with plausible long run estimates of the implied marginal propensity to consume out of income and wealth. In particular, the implied marginal propensity to consume out of housing wealth is estimated to be 0.03, which is lower than previous estimates for Hong Kong and estimates for other industrialised economies. It is argued that this is consistent with an uneven distribution of housing wealth in Hong Kong, skewed towards rich households. The owner- occupation rate in Hong Kong is under 50% which is low compared with other industrialised economies, reflecting the importance of the private and public rented sector. Nevertheless, a 10% increase in house prices is estimated to raise aggregate consumption by around 1% in Hong Kong, similar to the estimates for the US, UK and Canada, reflecting the overall size of housing assets relative to consumption. Based on this estimate, the 52% drop in housing wealth since 1997 would, if sustained, reduce consumption by HKD 66 billion, or just under 9% of annual 2001 consumption. The actual fall in consumption between 1997 and 2001 was 7.6% so the decline in housing wealth can, arithmetically, more than account for the weakness of consumption since then. For financial wealth, the implied marginal propensity to consume for Hong Kong is estimated to be between 0.02 and 0.04, similar to estimates for the US, UK and Canada. This is partly calibrated due to data limitations, and is consistent with survey information suggesting that the level of share ownership among households in Hong Kong is comparable to that in the US, UK and Canada but higher than in European countries. The implied long run marginal to propensity to consume out of labour income is 0.87, broadly in line with estimates for other industrial countries, e.g. the UK. There is some evidence that this has fallen in the second half of the sample period, possibly reflecting increased volatility in the macro economy following a sequence of negative shocks (the decline in asset prices in 1993-94; the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997-98; and the global recession post-2000).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Macroeconomics with number 0403013.

    in new window

    Length: 28 pages
    Date of creation: 22 Mar 2004
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0403013
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 28. HKIMR Working Paper No.1/2004
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. repec:fth:harver:1435 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Davidson, James E H, et al, 1978. "Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship between Consumers' Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 88(352), pages 661-92, December.
    3. Philippe BACCHETTA & Stefan GERLACH, 1997. "Consumption and Credit Constraints : International Evidence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'Econométrie et d'Economie politique (DEEP) 9707, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, DEEP.
    4. Christopher D. Carroll, 1992. "The Buffer-Stock Theory of Saving: Some Macroeconomic Evidence," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 23(2), pages 61-156.
    5. Hall, Robert E, 1978. "Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(6), pages 971-87, December.
    6. Gali, Jordi, 1990. "Finite horizons, life-cycle savings, and time-series evidence on consumption," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 433-452, December.
    7. Yash P. Mehra, 2001. "The wealth effect in empirical life-cycle aggregate consumption equations," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Spr, pages 45-67.
    8. John Y. Campbell & N. Gregory Mankiw, 1989. "Consumption, Income and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989, Volume 4, pages 185-246 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0403013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.