IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/5392.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do we need a zero pure time preference or the risk of climate catastrophes to justify a 2C global warming target ?

Author

Listed:
  • Dumas, P.
  • Hourcade, J. C.
  • Fabert, B. Perrissin

Abstract

This paper confronts the wide political support for the 2C objective of global increase in temperature, reaffirmed in Copenhagen, with the consistent set of hypotheses on which it relies. It explains why neither an almost zero pure time preference nor concerns about catastrophic damages in case of uncontrolled global warming are prerequisites for policy decisions preserving the possibility of meeting a 2C target. It rests on an optimal stochastic control model balancing the costs and benefits of climate policies resolved sequentially in order to account for the arrival of new information (the RESPONSE model). This model describes the optimal abatement pathways for 2,304 worldviews, combining hypotheses about growth rates, baseline emissions, abatement costs, pure time preference, damages, and climate sensitivity. It shows that 26 percent of the worldviews selecting the 2C target are not characterized by one of the extreme assumptions about pure time preference or climate change damages.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumas, P. & Hourcade, J. C. & Fabert, B. Perrissin, 2010. "Do we need a zero pure time preference or the risk of climate catastrophes to justify a 2C global warming target ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5392, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/07/30/000158349_20100730104858/Rendered/PDF/WPS5392.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minh Ha-Duong & Michael Grubb & Jean Charles Hourcade, 1997. "Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement," Post-Print halshs-00002452, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases; Climate Change Economics; Science of Climate Change; Global Environment Facility; Environment and Energy Efficiency;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.