IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

How the market transition affected export performance in the Central European economies

Listed author(s):
  • Kaminski, Bartlomiej
  • DEC
Registered author(s):

    Empirical studies have paid little attention to the supply-side forces behind the export performance of the Central and Eastern European countries of Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Romania (CEE-5) in OECD markets after the collapse of central planning. The author examines export developments in these countries in 1980-91, focusing on how transformation programs affected trade. OECD markets now receive three-fourths of CEE-5 exports. Sustaining this market penetration is crucial for countries making the transition to market-based economies. The author provides insight into the impact of transformation-cum-stabilization programs on export performance. These insights are relevant to former centrally planned economies that have yet to restore marcoeconomic equilibrium and to liberalize prices. The author examines the export performance of the CEE-5 before and after the collapse of central planning. He finds a close link between export performance and the decision to move quickly to a market-based economy. Countries that removed administrative controls on prices, devalued currency, introduced unified exchange rates, and liberalized trade also expanded exports. Bulgaria and Romania, crippled by macroeconomic chaos and vacillating macroeconomic reform, registered drops in both exports and imports. The author suggests that differences among Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland (CEE-3) had little to do with previous trends in export performance, external economic factors, and earlier attempts at trade reform. The expansion of exports in 1990-92 represented a dramatic reversal of trends prevalent in the prior two decades. The surge in exports is explained neither by the length of time experimenting with foreign trade under central planning nor by earlier trends in competitiveness in OECD markets. The driving force of export growth was manufactures, some of them redirected from CMEA markets, primarily to Germany. The severing of links that used to bind the economies of the CMEA had a less destructive impact on the foreign trade performance of the CEE-3 than one might have expected. The fact that exports to the CMEA fell at the same time that exports elsewhere (often of the same products) increased suggests a causal relationship.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1179.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 30 Sep 1993
    Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1179
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433

    Phone: (202) 477-1234
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Rosati MEP, Dariusz, 1992. "Problems of Post-CMEA Trade and Payments," CEPR Discussion Papers 650, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Erzan, Refik & Holmes, Christopher & Safadi, Raed, 1992. "How changes in the former CMEA area may affect international trade in manufactures," Policy Research Working Paper Series 973, The World Bank.
    3. Dani Rodrik, 1994. "Foreign Trade in Eastern Europe's Transition: Early Results," NBER Chapters,in: The Transition in Eastern Europe, Volume 2: Restructuring, pages 319-356 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.