IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11231.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yan
  • Huang, Jingyun
  • Wang, He

Abstract

Nearly three years after ChatGPT’s launch, the generative artificial intelligence landscape remains in rapid flux. Using high-frequency website traffic data from Semrush, this paper tracks global adoption patterns for the 60 most-visited consumer-facing generative artificial intelligence tools through mid-2025. Five key findings emerge. First, fierce competition drives continuous innovation: two of 2025’s top five tools—DeepSeek and Grok—are new entrants, and development is rapidly diversifying into multi-modal capabilities, reasoning, and specialized applications. Second, ChatGPT maintains dominance despite competition, accounting for 77 percent of traffic to the top 60 tools in April 2025. Third, usage of generative artificial intelligence has exploded since mid-2024: ChatGPT traffic grew 113 percent year-over-year, driven by 42 percent user growth and 50 percent increased visits per user, with session duration doubling. Fourth, high-income countries are pulling decisively ahead, creating stark global divides. While 24 percent of internet users in high-income countries use ChatGPT, penetration drops to 5.8 percent in upper-middle-income countries, 4.7 percent in lower-middle-income countries, and just 0.7 percent in low-income countries. Regression analysis confirms that gross domestic product per capita strongly predicts adoption growth. Fifth, localization shapes competitive advantage: non-U.S. tools concentrate heavily in home markets, with Le Chat drawing 69 percent of traffic from Europe and several Chinese tools exceeding 90 percent domestic usage. These patterns reveal an artificial intelligence landscape characterized by intense innovation, persistent market leadership, accelerating growth, and deepening global inequality, underscoring the need for inclusive policies as generative artificial intelligence becomes central to economic participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yan & Huang, Jingyun & Wang, He, 2025. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11231, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099856110152535288/pdf/IDU-42736e6b-48fb-45e6-8638-cec68a650f40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Jennifer & Cockburn, Iain & Bessen, James, 2024. "Is distance from innovation a barrier to the adoption of artificial intelligence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Abou El-Komboz, Lena & Goldbeck, Moritz, 2024. "Virtually borderless? Cultural proximity and international collaboration of developers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    4. Yao Lu & Gordon M. Phillips & Jia Yang, 2024. "The Impact of Cloud Computing and AI on Industry Dynamics and Concentration," NBER Working Papers 32811, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Anton Korinek & Jai Vipra, 2025. "Concentrating intelligence: scaling and market structure in artificial intelligence," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(121), pages 225-256.
    6. Yan Liu & He Wang, 2024. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10870, The World Bank.
    7. Choudhury, Prithwiraj, 2022. "Geographic mobility, immobility, and geographic flexibility: a review and agenda for research on the changing geography of work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128783, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Humlum, Anders & Vestergaard, Emilie, 2024. "The Adoption of ChatGPT," IZA Discussion Papers 16992, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabian Kosse & Tim Leffler & Arna Woemmel, 2025. "Digital Skills: Social Disparities and the Impact of Early Mentoring," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1222, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Fabian Kosse & Tim Leffler & Arna Woemmel, 2024. "Digital Skills: Social Disparities and the Impact of Early Mentoring," CESifo Working Paper Series 11570, CESifo.
    3. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    4. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    5. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamàs, 2025. "Transformative AI and Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Kaicheng Zhang & Kai Liu & Caihong Huang, 2024. "Cooperative Innovation Under the “Belt and Road Initiative” for Reducing Carbon Emissions: An Estimation Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Contractor, Zara & Reyes, Germán, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," IZA Discussion Papers 18055, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Henry A. Thompson, 2024. "AI and the law," Papers 2412.05090, arXiv.org.
    10. Nikolaos Askitas, 2025. "The Behavioral Signature of GenAI in Scientific Communication," CESifo Working Paper Series 12069, CESifo.
    11. Hamid Etemad, 2024. "Transformative potentials of generative artificial intelligence: Should international entrepreneurial enterprises adopt GEN.AI?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 141-163, June.
    12. Jeffery Piao & K. Philip Wang & Diana L. Weng, 2025. "U.S. Banks’ Artificial Intelligence and Small Business Lending: Evidence from the Census Bureau’s Annual Business Survey," Working Papers 25-07, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    13. James Bono & Alec Xu, 2024. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Security Copilot for IT Administrators," Papers 2411.01067, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    14. Benjamin G. Hyman & Benjamin Lahey & Karen Ni & Laura Pilossoph, 2025. "How Retrainable are AI-Exposed Workers?," NBER Working Papers 34174, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Eleanor W. Dillon & Sonia Jaffe & Nicole Immorlica & Christopher T. Stanton, 2025. "Shifting Work Patterns with Generative AI," NBER Working Papers 33795, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Yan Liu & He Wang, 2024. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10870, The World Bank.
    17. Sanchaita Hazra & Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder & Tuhin Chakrabarty, 2025. "AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work," Papers 2504.13959, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    18. Zara Contractor & Germán Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0359, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    19. Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary & Adel Abdulmohsen Alfalah & Mohammad Mulayh Alshammari & Aliyu Alhaji Abubakar, 2024. "Exploring factors influencing university students’ intentions to use ChatGPT: analysing task-technology fit theory to enhance behavioural intentions in higher education," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Masayuki MORIKAWA, 2024. "Macroeconomic Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity: An estimate from a survey," Discussion papers 24084, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.