IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i7s0048733325000988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Home vs office: Does workspace design influence where academics conduct their research?

Author

Listed:
  • Migliore, Alessandra
  • Rossi-Lamastra, Cristina
  • Tagliaro, Chiara

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how the spatial design of the workspace influences academics' choices to work at the university or from home (WFH) for their research activities. Following the organizational space literature, we conceptualize spaces for research work through four building blocks of spatial design (i.e., physical structure, perceived workplace arrangements, distance, and spatial scale). We analyze how these four building blocks influence academics' daily work organization between home and office, and whether this influence varies across disciplines. The empirical part of the study relies on a unique dataset combining primary and secondary data on Italian academics across all disciplines. The findings emphasize the importance of space design in academic work organization. They also reveal that the influence of spatial design features varies across disciplines. Each discipline has its unique work organization and range of tasks, leading to distinct spatial requirements. Additional analyses show that the decision over where to work influences scientific productivity. The paper contributes to the literature on academic work organization, organizational spaces, and remote working.

Suggested Citation

  • Migliore, Alessandra & Rossi-Lamastra, Cristina & Tagliaro, Chiara, 2025. "Home vs office: Does workspace design influence where academics conduct their research?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(7).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:7:s0048733325000988
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:7:s0048733325000988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.