IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uts/wpaper/177.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Lead Articles Signal Higher Quality in the Digital Age? Evidence from Finance Journals

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Citations are regarded as measures of quality yet citation rates vary widely within each of the top finance journals. Since article ordering is at the discretion of editors, lead articles can be interpreted as signals of quality that academics can use to allocate their attention and assert the value of their publications. Advances in electronic journal access allow researchers to directly access articles, suggesting article ordering may be less relevant today. We confirm the past importance of lead articles by examining citation rates from published papers as well as the wider source of papers that are listed in Google Scholar. Our findings also confirm using Google Scholar as a citation source provides congruent results to using citations from articles published in ISI-listed journals, with the additional benefit of it potentially being more timely since it includes wider citation sources, inclusive of working and conference papers.

Suggested Citation

  • David Michayluk & Ralf Zurbruegg, 2013. "Do Lead Articles Signal Higher Quality in the Digital Age? Evidence from Finance Journals," Working Paper Series 177, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:wpaper:177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.finance.uts.edu.au/research/wpapers/wp177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mingers & Evangelia A. E. C. G. Lipitakis, 2010. "Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 613-625, November.
    2. Lee Pinkowitz, 2002. "Research Dissemination and Impact: Evidence from Web Site Downloads," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 485-499, February.
    3. Marshall Medoff, 2003. "Article placement and market signalling," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(8), pages 479-482.
    4. Hendrik P. van Dalen & K?ne Henkens, 2005. "Signals in science - On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 64(2), pages 209-233, August.
    5. Laband, David N & Piette, Michael J, 1994. "Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(1), pages 194-203, February.
    6. Shi Young Lee & Sanghack Lee & Sung Hee Jun, 2010. "Author and article characteristics, journal quality and citation in economic research," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(17), pages 1697-1701.
    7. M. H. Medoff, 2003. "Article placement and market signalling," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(10), pages 601-604.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rüdiger Mutz & Tobias Wolbring & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2017. "The effect of the “very important paper” (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(9), pages 2139-2153, September.
    2. Jacques Wainer & Michael Eckmann & Anderson Rocha, 2015. "Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Chongyu Dang & Zhichuan (Frank) Li, 2020. "Drivers of research impact: evidence from the top three finance journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2759-2809, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lead article; citations; Google Scholar;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:wpaper:177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Duncan Ford). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.