IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unl/unlfep/wp393.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development

Author

Listed:
  • Gomes, Jorge F.
  • Weerd-Nederhof, Petra C. de
  • Pearson, Alan W.
  • Miguel Pina e Cunha

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomes, Jorge F. & Weerd-Nederhof, Petra C. de & Pearson, Alan W. & Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2000. "Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp393, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/83633/1/WP393.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Dougherty, 1992. "Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 179-202, May.
    2. Cooper, Robert G., 1990. "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 44-54.
    3. Mary Beth Pinto & Jeffrey K. Pinto & John E. Prescott, 1993. "Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1281-1297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mitsuru Kodama & Tomoatsu Shibata, 2013. "Research into Ambidextrous R&D in Product Development New Product Development at a Precision Device Maker," TMARG Discussion Papers 109, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    2. Benedikt Müller-Stewens & Klaus Möller, 2017. "Performance in new product development: a comprehensive framework, current trends, and research directions," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 157-201, May.
    3. Pop Ioan Gh. & Fotea Ioan S. & Fotea Silvia L., 2018. "Innovation Networking, Knowledge Transdisciplinary Spaces," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(2), pages 86-106, June.
    4. Jinwan Cho & Eunmi Kim & Insik Jeong, 2017. "International orientation and cross-functional integration in new product development," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 226-252, December.
    5. Ana Pérez-Luño & Ana Bojica & Shanthi Gopalakrishnan, 2017. "When More Is Less: The Moderating Role Of Cross-Functional Integration And Organizational Knowledge Complexity On Product Innovation Performance," Working Papers 17.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Organization and Marketing (former Department of Business Administration).
    6. Šenk Mateja & Metlikovič Peter & Maletič Matjaž & Gomišček Boštjan, 2010. "Development of New Product/Process Development Procedure for SMEs," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 43(2), pages 76-86, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leenders, M.A.A.M. & Wierenga, B., 2001. "The Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R&D," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-20-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Donald Gerwin & Nicholas J. Barrowman, 2002. "An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 938-953, July.
    3. Mitsuru Kodama & Tomoatsu Shibata, 2013. "Research into Ambidextrous R&D in Product Development New Product Development at a Precision Device Maker," TMARG Discussion Papers 109, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    4. Imran Anwar Mir, 2011. "Innovative Process Management: A Strategic Weapon to Succeed in a Dynamic and Hyper Competitive Environment," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(6), pages 315-327.
    5. Maltz, Elliot & Souder, William E. & Kumar, Ajith, 2001. "Influencing R&D/marketing integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: intended and unintended effects of managerial actions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 69-82, April.
    6. Im, Subin & Nakata, Cheryl, 2008. "Crafting an environment to foster integration in new product teams," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 164-172.
    7. Paola Criscuolo & Ammon Salter & Anne L. J. Ter Wal, 2014. "Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1287-1305, October.
    8. Ceci, Federica & Prencipe, Andrea, 2013. "Does Distance Hinder Coordination? Identifying and Bridging Boundaries of Offshored Work," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 324-332.
    9. Leenders, M.A.A.M. & Wierenga, B., 2002. "How The Impact Of Integration Of Marketing And R&D Differs Depending On A Firm?s Resources And Its Strategic Scope," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-68-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Jonathon N. Cummings, 2004. "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 352-364, March.
    11. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2010. "Using the fuzzy associative memory (FAM) computation to explore the R&D project performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 537-549, April.
    12. Nicoletti, Sergio & Nicolo, Fabio, 1998. "A concurrent engineering decision model: Management of the project activities information flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 115-127, January.
    13. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.
    14. Peschl, Markus F. & Bottaro, Gloria & Hartner-Tiefenthaler, Martina & Rötzer, Katharina, 2014. "Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation. Towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation," MPRA Paper 66539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Swink, Morgan L. & Sandvig, J. Christopher & Mabert, Vincent A., 1996. "Adding "zip" to product development: Concurrent engineering methods and tools," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 41-49.
    16. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    17. Bookhagen, Andrea & Sperber, Sonja, 2017. "Kundenintegration in den Entwicklungsprozess von Produktinnovationen durch Crowdsourcing," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 2(01/2017), pages 21-37.
    18. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    19. Krohmer, Harley & Homburg, Christian & Workman, John P., 2002. "Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 451-465, June.
    20. Gopesh Anand & John Gray & Enno Siemsen, 2012. "Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1700-1716, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Lopes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feunlpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.