IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeow/26-07.html

Why is vocational education stigmatised? Evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Robbie Maris

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Jake Anders

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Tammy Campbell

    (Education Policy Institute)

  • Gill Wyness

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

Abstract

It is a widely recognised problem that vocational education and training (VET) is stigmatised around the world. This stigma affects student choices, life satisfaction and the provision of skills, and is of growing concern to policymakers and researchers. Prior work suggests these attitudes are determined, in-part, by four closely related mechanisms: perceptions of quality, information and awareness of VET, direct and indirect experience and social class. Drawing on theories of institutional skill formation and educational stratification, we examine how these mechanisms are associated with negative attitudes towards VET and how their associations vary across European systems. We show that perceptions of quality explain a large amount of the variation in attitudes towards VET. We find significant variation in stigma by social class, even after accounting for differences in the perceived quality of VET. Individuals from the upper and middle classes are significantly more likely to stigmatise VET than respondents from the working class. There is considerable heterogeneity across countries and this is driven in-part by the type of VET system they have. Countries with stronger links between VET and employers tend to have more positive attitudes and exposure to these types of systems (through experience and other information sources) could improve perceptions. These results have important implications for policy and future research, pointing to key areas of focus for improving the social perceptions of VET around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbie Maris & Jake Anders & Tammy Campbell & Gill Wyness, 2026. "Why is vocational education stigmatised? Evidence from Europe," CEPEO Working Paper Series 26-07, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeow:26-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeow/cepeowp26-07.pdf
    File Function: Initial version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeow:26-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.