IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/1301.html

GMM Efficiency and IPW Estimation for Nonsmooth Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Otávio Bartalotti

    (Department of Economics, Tulane University)

Abstract

In a GMM setting this paper analyzes the problem in which we have two sets of moment conditions, where two sets of parameters enter into one set of moment conditions, while only one set of parameters enters into the other, extending Prokhorov and Schmidt's (2009) redundancy results to nonsmooth objective functions, and obtains relatively efficient estimates of interesting parameters in the presence of nuisance parameters. One-step GMM estimation for both set of parameters is asymptotically more efficient than two-step procedures. These results are applied to Wooldridge's (2007) inverse probability weighted estimator (IPW), generalizing the framework to deal with missing data in this context. Two-step estimation of beta_0 is more efficient than using known probabilities of selection, but this is dominated by one-step joint estimation. Examples for missing data quantile regression and instrumental variable quantile regression are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Otávio Bartalotti, 2013. "GMM Efficiency and IPW Estimation for Nonsmooth Functions," Working Papers 1301, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.tulane.edu/RePEc/pdf/tul1301.pdf
    File Function: First Version, January 2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cattaneo, Matias D., 2010. "Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 138-154, April.
    2. Xiaohong Chen & Oliver Linton & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2003. "Estimation of Semiparametric Models when the Criterion Function Is Not Smooth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1591-1608, September.
    3. Moshe Buchinsky, 1998. "Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 88-126.
    4. Newey, Whitney K., 1984. "A method of moments interpretation of sequential estimators," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 14(2-3), pages 201-206.
    5. Pakes, Ariel & Pollard, David, 1989. "Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(5), pages 1027-1057, September.
    6. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731, January.
    7. Pollard, David, 1985. "New Ways to Prove Central Limit Theorems," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 295-313, December.
    8. Hitomi, Kohtaro & Nishiyama, Yoshihiko & Okui, Ryo, 2008. "A Puzzling Phenomenon In Semiparametric Estimation Problems With Infinite-Dimensional Nuisance Parameters," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 1717-1728, December.
    9. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2007. "Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1281-1301, December.
    10. Newey, Whitney K, 1994. "The Asymptotic Variance of Semiparametric Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1349-1382, November.
    11. Joshua Angrist & Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val, 2006. "Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S. Wage Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 539-563, March.
    12. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2008. "Instrumental variable quantile regression: A robust inference approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 379-398, January.
    13. Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder, 2003. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1161-1189, July.
    14. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
    15. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2006. "Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 491-525, June.
    16. Qian, Hailong & Schmidt, Peter, 1999. "Improved instrumental variables and generalized method of moments estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 145-169, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timo Dimitriadis & Tobias Fissler & Johanna Ziegel, 2020. "The Efficiency Gap," Papers 2010.14146, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    2. Timo Dimitriadis & Julie Schnaitmann, 2019. "Forecast Encompassing Tests for the Expected Shortfall," Papers 1908.04569, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ichimura, Hidehiko & Todd, Petra E., 2007. "Implementing Nonparametric and Semiparametric Estimators," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 74, Elsevier.
    2. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
    3. Ying-Ying Lee, 2014. "Partial Mean Processes with Generated Regressors: Continuous Treatment Effects and Nonseparable Models," Economics Series Working Papers 706, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    4. Cattaneo, Matias D., 2010. "Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 138-154, April.
    5. Chen, Songnian, 2023. "Two-step estimation of censored quantile regression for duration models with time-varying regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1310-1336.
    6. Chaudhuri, Saraswata & Frazier, David T. & Renault, Eric, 2018. "Indirect Inference with endogenously missing exogenous variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 55-75.
    7. Rothe, Christoph & Firpo, Sergio Pinheiro, 2013. "Semiparametric estimation and inference using doubly robust moment conditions," Textos para discussão 330, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    8. Kyoo il Kim, 2019. "Efficiency of Average Treatment Effect Estimation When the True Propensity Is Parametric," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, May.
    9. David Kang & Seojeong Lee, 2025. "Misspecification-Robust Asymptotic and Bootstrap Inference for Nonsmooth GMM," Working Papers 423284005, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    10. de Castro, Luciano & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kaplan, David M. & Liu, Xin, 2019. "Smoothed GMM for quantile models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 121-144.
    11. Han, Chirok & Kim, Beomsoo, 2011. "A GMM interpretation of the paradox in the inverse probability weighting estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 163-165, February.
    12. Firpo, Sergio & Galvao, Antonio F. & Song, Suyong, 2017. "Measurement errors in quantile regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 146-164.
    13. Muller, Christophe, 2018. "Heterogeneity and nonconstant effect in two-stage quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 3-12.
    14. Chen, Songnian, 2025. "Quantile regression with group-level treatments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Mammen, Enno & Rothe, Christoph & Schienle, Melanie, 2016. "Semiparametric Estimation With Generated Covariates," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1140-1177, October.
    16. Firpo, Sergio Pinheiro & Pinto, Rafael de Carvalho Cayres, 2012. "Combining Strategies for the Estimation of Treatment Effects," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 32(1), March.
    17. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian & Jansson, Michael, 2009. "Finite sample inference for quantile regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 93-103, October.
    18. Chris Muris, 2020. "Efficient GMM Estimation with Incomplete Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 518-530, July.
    19. Tae-Hwan Kim & Christophe Muller, 2012. "Bias Transmission and Variance Reduction in Two-Stage Quantile Regression," Working Papers halshs-00793372, HAL.
    20. Anil K. Bera & Antonio F. Galvao Jr. & Gabriel V. Montes-Rojas & Sung Y. Park, 2014. "Which Quantile is the Most Informative? Maximum Likelihood, Maximum Entropy and Quantile Regression," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kaddour Hadri & William Mikhail (ed.), Econometric Methods and Their Applications in Finance, Macro and Related Fields, chapter 7, pages 167-199, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicholas Lacoste (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detulus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.