IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tsa/wpaper/00111mkt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Threat Perception in Older Customers

Author

Listed:
  • David Silvera

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Tracy Meyer

    (University of North Carolina Wilmington)

  • Daniel Laufer

    (Yeshiva University)

Abstract

Previous research indicates that older consumers have a reduced capacity to engage in primary control behaviors that involve active responses to counteract threats, and thus compensate with secondary control processes that involve perceiving negative events as less threatening. Two studies were conducted to examine secondary control processes in older vs. younger consumers in relation to product harm crises. In both studies, older consumers perceived themselves as less vulnerable to the product harm crisis and viewed the crisis as less severe than younger consumers. Older consumers also placed less blame on the company involved in the crisis than younger consumers, and had stronger intentions to purchase and recommend products associated with the involved company in the future. These results suggest that secondary control processes in older consumers can exert an important influence on how this consumer segment interprets negative marketing events.

Suggested Citation

  • David Silvera & Tracy Meyer & Daniel Laufer, 2009. "Threat Perception in Older Customers," Working Papers 0066, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:00111mkt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://interim.business.utsa.edu/wps/files/mkt/0066MKT-448-2009.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Folkes, Valerie S, 1988. "Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 548-565, March.
    2. Holbrook, Morris B. & Schindler, Robert M., 1996. "Market segmentation based on age and attitude toward the past: Concepts, methods, and findings concerning nostalgic influences on customer tastes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 27-39, September.
    3. Yoon, Carolyn, 1997. "Age Differences in Consumers' Processing Strategies: An Investigation of Moderating Influences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(3), pages 329-342, December.
    4. Jeri Jones & Karen Middleton, 2007. "Ethical Decision-Making by Consumers: The Roles of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 247-264, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    2. Anubhav A. Mishra, 2018. "Consumer responses to brand deletion," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 160-170, March.
    3. Per Åsberg & Henrik Uggla, 2019. "Introducing multi-dimensional brand architecture: taking structure, market orientation and stakeholder alignment into account," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 483-496, September.
    4. Cheng-Kui Huang & Shin-Horng Chen & Chia-Chen Hu & Ming-Ching Lee, 2022. "Understanding the adoption of the mask-supply information platforms during the COVID-19," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2405-2427, December.
    5. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Usrey, Bryan, 2021. "The impact of influencer motives and commonness perceptions on follower reactions toward incentivized reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 531-548.
    6. Iris Vermeir & Patrick Kenhove, 2008. "Gender Differences in Double Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 281-295, August.
    7. Nika Meyer (née Mozafari) & Melanie Schwede & Maik Hammerschmidt & Welf Hermann Weiger, 2022. "Users taking the blame? How service failure, recovery, and robot design affect user attributions and retention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2491-2505, December.
    8. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    9. Gökçe Esenduran & James A. Hill & In Joon Noh, 2020. "Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1188-1211, May.
    10. Angela Aerry Choi & Daegon Cho & Dobin Yim & Jae Yun Moon & Wonseok Oh, 2019. "When Seeing Helps Believing: The Interactive Effects of Previews and Reviews on E-Book Purchases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1164-1183, December.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5853 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. P. Van Kenhove & K. De Wulf & D. Van Den Poelt, 2003. "Does Attitudinal Commitment to Stores Always Lead to Behavioral Loyalty? The Moderating Effect of Age," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/168, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    13. Şeniz Özhan, 2020. "The Effect of Nostalgia Proneness on Ad-Evoked Nostalgia, Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 49(2), pages 380-390, November.
    14. Zhu, Zhen & Nakata, Cheryl & Sivakumar, K. & Grewal, Dhruv, 2013. "Fix It or Leave It? Customer Recovery from Self-service Technology Failures," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 15-29.
    15. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2020. "Antecedents and consequences of cross-effects: An empirical analysis of omni-coupons," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 405-420.
    16. Zhou, Ling & Wang, Tao & Zhang, Qin & Mou, Yupeng, 2013. "Consumer insecurity and preference for nostalgic products: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2406-2411.
    17. Marleen Hermans & Néomie Raassens & Kathleen Cleeren, 2024. "What is the impact of a conflict delisting on firm value? An investigation of the role of conflict and firm characteristics," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 240-259, January.
    18. Yaqi Liu & Xiaoyuan Wang, 2020. "Differences in Driving Intention Transitions Caused by Driver’s Emotion Evolutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2016. "An Extended Model of Moral Outrage at Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 429-444, May.
    20. Pomering, Alan & Johnson, Lester W., 2009. "Constructing a corporate social responsibility reputation using corporate image advertising," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 106-114.
    21. Florence Benoît-Moreau & Béatrice Parguel, 2007. "Societal communication and brand equity," Post-Print halshs-00146705, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    primary control; secondary control; product harm crisis; threat perception; elderly; blame attribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:00111mkt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wendy Frost (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbutsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.