IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/stc/stcp8e/202400200003e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

High school graduation and postsecondary enrolment of Black, Latin American and other population groups: What explains the differences?

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Bonikowska
  • Tomasz Handler
  • Marc Frenette

Abstract

Given the large differences in educational attainment observed across non-Indigenous population groups in Canada, understanding when these differences emerge and what may explain them is an important first step in informing policy discussions on the issue. Using the British Columbia kindergarten to Grade 12 dataset, the Postsecondary Student Information System, the 2016 Census of Population, and the T1 Family File tax data, this study follows several cohorts of Grade 9 students in British Columbia over time to explore differences between population groups, by gender, in the probability and timing of high school graduation and enrolment in academic postsecondary programs. The analysis assesses the extent to which differences in high school course marks (Grade 10 English, science and math) and other factors, such as adjusted parental income and immigrant status, account for differences in these outcomes between population groups. On-time high school graduation rates varied by upwards of 10 percentage points across population groups for each gender, with lower rates registered by Latin American, Black and West Asian students, and higher rates by Japanese, Korean, Chinese and South Asian students. In all population groups, girls were more likely than boys to graduate high school on time. Given an extra year, the graduation rate increased among all groups, most notably among Black boys. For boys and girls, enrolment rates in postsecondary programs were lowest among Latin American, Black and White students, and highest among Chinese, Korean and South Asian students. Differences in Grade 10 course marks explained a substantial share of the gaps in education outcomes between many of the population groups and White students. By contrast, adjusted parental income differences explained smaller shares of the gaps than differences in course marks did, in most cases. Comparing the standardized test scores for literacy of Latin American and Black students with those of White students in grades 4 and 7, and provincial exam marks in Grade 10 English, showed that skill gaps implied by the lower (relative to White students) course marks obtained by Latin American and Black students in Grade 10 may have existed at least as early as Grade 4. Parental income may have exerted an indirect effect on educational outcomes through its influence on academic performance (though this study cannot shed light on this).

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Bonikowska & Tomasz Handler & Marc Frenette, 2024. "High school graduation and postsecondary enrolment of Black, Latin American and other population groups: What explains the differences?," Economic and Social Reports 202400200003e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch.
  • Handle: RePEc:stc:stcp8e:202400200003e
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202400200003-eng
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/36-28-0001/2024002/article/00003-eng.htm
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/36-28-0001/2024002/article/00003-eng.pdf?st=H5B9NU9Z
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202400200003-eng?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Holmlund & Mikael Lindahl & Erik Plug, 2011. "The Causal Effect of Parents' Schooling on Children's Schooling: A Comparison of Estimation Methods," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 615-651, September.
    2. Margo Coleman & Thomas DeLeire, 2003. "An Economic Model of Locus of Control and the Human Capital Investment Decision," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 38(3).
    3. Fernando Botelho & Ricardo Madeira, Marcos A. Rangel, 2015. "Racial Discrimination in Grading: Evidence from Brazil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2015_04, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    4. Fernando Botelho & Ricardo A. Madeira & Marcos A. Rangel, 2015. "Racial Discrimination in Grading: Evidence from Brazil," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 37-52, October.
    5. Hou, Feng & Chen, Wen-Hao, 2019. "Intergenerational Education Mobility and Labour Market Outcomes: Variation Among the Second Generation of Immigrants in Canada," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2019006e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huong Thu Le & Ha Trong Nguyen, 2018. "The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, December.
    2. Cristina Bellés-Obrero & María Lombardi, 2022. "Teacher Performance Pay and Student Learning: Evidence from a Nationwide Program in Peru," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(4), pages 1631-1669.
    3. Bart H. H. Golsteyn & Cécile Magnée & Inge Wolf, 2024. "Did Migrant Children Benefit from a Delay in the Dutch Primary School Exit Test?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 141-166, September.
    4. Cui, Ying & Liu, Hong & Zhao, Liqiu, 2019. "Mother's education and child development: Evidence from the compulsory school reform in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 669-692.
    5. Lavy, Victor & Sand, Edith, 2018. "On the origins of gender gaps in human capital: Short- and long-term consequences of teachers' biases," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 263-279.
    6. Shi, Ying & Zhu, Maria, 2023. "“Model minorities” in the classroom? Positive evaluation bias towards Asian students and its consequences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Alberto Alesina & Michela Carlana & Eliana La Ferrara & Paolo Pinotti, 2024. "Revealing Stereotypes: Evidence from Immigrants in Schools," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 1916-1948, July.
    8. Yang, Xiaoliang & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Unveiling citation bias in economics: Taste-based discrimination against Chinese-authored papers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Victor Lavy & Rigissa Megalokonomou, 2019. "Persistency in Teachers’ Grading Bias and Effects on Longer-Term Outcomes: University Admissions Exams and Choice of Field of Study," NBER Working Papers 26021, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Carlos J. Gil-Hernández & Mar C. Espadafor, 2024. "An Elephant in the Classroom: Teacher Bias by Student SES or Ability Measurement Bias?," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2024_05, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    11. Lavy, Victor & Sand, Edith, "undated". "On The Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases," Economic Research Papers 270009, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    12. Ferman, Bruno & Fontes, Luiz Felipe, 2020. "Discriminating Behavior: Evidence from teachers’ grading bias," MPRA Paper 100400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Rangel, Marcos & Marotta, Luana & van der Werf, Cynthia & Duryea, Suzanne & Drouet Arias, Marcelo & Rodríguez Guillén, Lucina, 2024. "Barriers to Immigrant Assimilation: Evidence on Grading Bias in Ecuadorian High Schools," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13434, Inter-American Development Bank.
    14. Bredtmann, Julia & Otten, Sebastian & Vonnahme, Christina, 2024. "Discrimination in grading? Evidence on teachers' evaluation bias towards minority students," Ruhr Economic Papers 1122, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Burn, Hester & Fumagalli, Laura & Rabe, Birgitta, 2024. "Stereotyping and ethnicity gaps in teacher assigned grades," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Elacqua, Gregory & Rodrigues, Mateus & Rosa, Leonardo, 2025. "Impact of Monetary Incentives on Teacher Decisions to Leave and Choose Schools: Evidence from a Policy Reform in SaÞo Paulo," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13950, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Zhu, Maria, 2024. "New Findings on Racial Bias in Teachers' Evaluations of Student Achievement," IZA Discussion Papers 16815, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Tumen, Semih & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Wahba, Jackline, 2021. "Training Teachers for Diversity Awareness: Impact on School Attendance of Refugee Children," IZA Discussion Papers 14557, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Cheti Nicoletti & Almudena Sevilla & Valentina Tonei, 2022. "Gender stereotypes in the family," CEP Discussion Papers dp1891, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Ferman, Bruno & Fontes, Luiz Felipe, 2022. "Assessing knowledge or classroom behavior? Evidence of teachers’ grading bias," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stc:stcp8e:202400200003e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.