IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spa/wpaper/2026wpecon16.html

Legacies of Slavery or a Brave New World? Labor productivity and remuneration in the Brazilian coffee economy – new microdata evidence from Ibicaba plantation (1888-1958)

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Gabriel Witzel de Souza

Abstract

Studying the historical origins of income differentials in the past is crucial for explaining the socioeconomic mobility of distinct ethnolinguistic groups, in the short- and long-run. This issue is particularly pressing in Brazil, a country characterized by extreme levels of income inequality that correlate with racial components traceable to the country’s historic slave-based economy. Yet rural labor markets in post-Abolition Brazil remain poorly understood, from a quantitative viewpoint, despite those emerging non-captive markets being also the main channel for the mass immigration of European fieldhands from the late 1880s to the 1920s. Such an important research gap reflects the scarcity of adequate microdata. The Ibicaba Project has begun to address this problem by creating a new archive in that plantation. Ibicaba is one of Brazil’s most important historical plantations precisely for being the first rural unit to employ indentured European laborers during the early transition from slavery in the country, while, simultaneously, remaining the largest slaveholder in São Paulo’s Old Western coffee zone. Drawing upon sixteen ledgers that record Ibicaba’s entire resident labor force between 1888 and 1958 (with gaps), this paper studies the emergence of labor markets in the post-Abolition era and tests competing hypotheses about the role of ethnolinguistic origins in determining labor remunerations. The empirical analysis does not support the hypothesis of taste-based discrimination. After controlling for households’ quantity-based TFP, ethnolinguistic origins did not lead to higher (positive discrimination in favor of European immigrants and their descendants) or lower (negative discrimination against Non-Whites) prices earned for the same type of homogenous agricultural task. However, results support the hypothesis of statistical discrimination. Based on labor arrangements highly dependent on intrahousehold divisions of labor, larger households were hired more frequently to cultivate coffee in the lean season and engaged for longer in harvesting. A major burden from slavery to the Black population in Ibicaba was the small number of economically-active household members. Finally, the paper traces the income profiles of various European immigrants and their descendants. German-speakers and Portuguese had labor income profiles closer to that of White Brazilians. The income profile of Italian immigrants and their descendants, however, shows evidence of households who performed rather poorly and probably failed to reach their “South American dreams†.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Gabriel Witzel de Souza, 2026. "Legacies of Slavery or a Brave New World? Labor productivity and remuneration in the Brazilian coffee economy – new microdata evidence from Ibicaba plantation (1888-1958)," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2026_16, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
  • Handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2026wpecon16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.repec.eae.fea.usp.br/documentos/WitzelSouza_16WP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N56 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • N36 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • N86 - Economic History - - Micro-Business History - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2026wpecon16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pedro Garcia Duarte The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Pedro Garcia Duarte to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.