IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp25-03.html

How did the Canada Child Benefit affect household bargaining?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Child benefits in Canada are sizeable, targeted to children and paid to custodial mothers, and so might be expected to affect household resource allocations and spousal bargaining. The introduction of the Canada Child Benefit in July 2016 more than doubled the amount of child benefits received by households with children. We estimate the effect of this change on the preferences and resource shares of adult males and females within dual parent households. Resource shares, defined as the fraction of household expenditure consumed by females versus males, are important parameters of collective household models. Using a difference-in-differences strategy within a structural collective household model, we find little evidence that preferences of either adult males or females changed in response to the increase in child benefits. However, we do find evidence that the policy increased female resource shares, but only among homeowner (and not renter) households. We discuss this heterogeneity in the treatment effect between owners and renters and suggest potential underlying mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirleen Manzur and Krishna Pendakur, 2025. "How did the Canada Child Benefit affect household bargaining?," Discussion Papers dp25-03, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp25-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfu.ca/repec-econ/sfu/sfudps/dp25-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp25-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.