Should the Private Sector Provide Public Capital?
The choice between private and government provision of a productive public good like infrastructure (public capital) is examined in the context of an endogenously growing open economy. The accumulation of public capital need not require government provision, in contrast to the standard assumption in the literature. Even with an efficient government, the relative costs and benefits of government and private provision depend crucially on the economyâ€™s underlying structural conditions, borrowing constraints in international capital markets, and installation costs. Countries with limited substitution possibilities and large production externalities may benefit from governments encouraging private provision of public capital through targeted investment subsidies. On the other hand, countries with flexible substitution possibilities and relatively smaller externalities may benefit either from governments directly providing public capital, or from regulation of private providers. The transitional dynamics are also shown to depend on the underlying elasticity of substitution and the size of the production externality
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||04 Jul 2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://comp-econ.org/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.