Should The Private Sector Provide Public Capital?
The choice between private and government provision of a productive public good like infrastructure (public capital) is examined in the context of an endogenously growing open economy. The accumulation of public capital need not require government provision, in contrast to the standard assumption in the literature. Even with an efficient government, the relative costs and benefits of government and private provision depend crucially on the economyâ€™s underlying structural conditions, borrowing constraints in international capital markets, and installation costs. Countries with limited substitution possibilities and large production externalities may benefit from governments encouraging private provision of public capital through targeted investment subsidies. On the other hand, countries with flexible substitution possibilities and relatively smaller externalities may benefit either from governments directly providing public capital, or from regulation of private providers. The transitional dynamics are also shown to depend on the underlying elasticity of substitution and the size of the production externality
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Volume (Year): 11 (2007)
Issue (Month): 03 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_MDY
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:11:y:2007:i:03:p:318-346_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.