IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/85386.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Secondary Products, By-products and the Commodity Technology Assumption

Author

Listed:
  • Londero, Elio

Abstract

A more general method for preparing commodity by commodity input-output tables under the commodity technology assumption is presented for the case when there are produced and non-produced by-products, originating in both principal and secondary production. Existing methods of the same family are shown to be special cases of the one presented. A numerical example (not included) shows that incorrect model specification is a sufficient condition for unwarranted negative coefficients. Finally, the model is shown to satisfy desirable properties of an input-output system.

Suggested Citation

  • Londero, Elio, 1998. "Secondary Products, By-products and the Commodity Technology Assumption," MPRA Paper 85386, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:85386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85386/1/MPRA_paper_85386.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pieter Kop Jansen & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "The Choice of Model in the Construction of Input–Output Coefficients Matrices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 4, pages 47-66, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Londero, Elio, 1996. "Shadow Pricing Rules for Partially Traded Goods," MPRA Paper 111765, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "An Alternative Treatment of Secondary Products in Input–Output Analysis: Frustration," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 5, pages 67-76, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Elio Londero, 2001. "By-Products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 35-45.
    5. Steenge, Albert E., 1990. "The commodity technology revisited : Theoretical basis and an application to error location in the make-use framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 376-387, October.
    6. ten Raa, Thijs & Chakraborty, Debesh & Small, J Anthony, 1984. "An Alternative Treatment of Secondary Products in Input-Output Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(1), pages 88-97, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shigemi Kagawa & Hajime Inamura & Yuichi Moriguchi, 2002. "The Invisible Multipliers of Joint-products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 185-203, June.
    2. Elio Londero, 2001. "By-Products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 35-45.
    3. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 451-467, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thijs ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2009. "The Construction of Input–Output Coefficients Matrices in an Axiomatic Context: Some Further Considerations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 6, pages 77-101, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Shigemi Kagawa & Hajime Inamura & Yuichi Moriguchi, 2002. "The Invisible Multipliers of Joint-products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 185-203, June.
    3. Elio Londero, 2001. "By-Products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 35-45.
    4. George Soklis, 2009. "The Conversion of the Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 3(1), pages 51-70, June.
    5. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 451-467, April.
    6. Sulaiman, Noorasiah, 2012. "An Input-Output Analysis of the Total Factor Productivity Growth of the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector, 1983-2005," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 46(1), pages 147-155.
    7. Clopper Almon, 2000. "Product-to-Product Tables via Product-Technology with No Negative Flows," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 27-43.
    8. Eivind Lekve Bjelle & Johannes Többen & Konstantin Stadler & Thomas Kastner & Michaela C. Theurl & Karl-Heinz Erb & Kjartan-Steen Olsen & Kirsten S. Wiebe & Richard Wood, 2020. "Adding country resolution to EXIOBASE: impacts on land use embodied in trade," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Cansino Muñoz-Repiso, José Manuel & Cardenete Flores, M.Alejandro & Ordóñez Ríos, Manuel & Román Collado, Rocío, 2013. "Análisis de sectores clave de la economía española a partir de la Matriz de Contabilidad Social de España 2007/Key Sectors Analysis of the Spanish Economy Using a Social Accounting Matrix for 2007," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 621-654, Septiembr.
    10. Garry Mcdonald, 2010. "A didactic Input-Output model for territorial ecology analyses," Working Papers hal-00911640, HAL.
    11. Thijs ten Raa & Pierre Mohnen, 2009. "The Location of Comparative Advantages on the Basis of Fundamentals Only," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 23, pages 425-446, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Ten Raa, T. & Wolff, E.N., 1996. "Outsourcing of services and the productivity recovery in U.S. manufacturing in the 1980s," Other publications TiSEM 6c84d041-e198-4082-9ca5-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Clouse, Candi & Thorvaldson, Jenny & Jolley, G. Jason, 2023. "Impact Factors: Methodological Standards for Applied Input-Output Analysis," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), September.
    14. Thijs Raa, 2020. "Linkages, fields of influence and key sectors," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-3, December.
    15. Lars Bohlin & Lars Widell, 2006. "Estimation of commodity-by-commodity input-output matrices," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 205-215.
    16. Raa, Thijs ten & Wolff, Edward N., 1991. "Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 581-615, December.
    17. Nijman, T.E. & Steel, M.F.J., 1988. "Exclusion restrictions in instrumental variables equations," Research Memorandum FEW 327, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. José M. Rueda-Cantuche & Thijs ten Raa, 2021. "The Choice of Model in the Construction of Industry Coefficients Matrices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Efficiency and Input-Output Analyses Theory and Applications, chapter 16, pages 271-287, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2007. "The Impact of China's Import Demand Growth on Sectoral Specialization in Brazil: A CGE Assessment," MPRA Paper 6200, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Rod B. McNaughton & Brian Paul Cozzarin, 2014. "Inter-organizational linkages and resource dependence," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    input-output; commodity technology assumption; by-products;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:85386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.