IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cea/doctra/e2003_30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Construction of input-output Coefficients Matrices in an Axiomatic Context: Some Further Considerations

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Kop Jansen and ten Raa (1990) established a purely theoretical solution to the problem of selecting a model for the construction of coefficients on the basis of make and use tables. In an axiomatic context, they singled out the so-called commodity technology model as the best one according to some desirable properties. The aim of this paper is to delineate the restrictions on the relevant data sets that ensure fulfillment of the desirable properties by other models used by statistical offices.

Suggested Citation

  • Thijs ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda Cantuche, 2003. "The Construction of input-output Coefficients Matrices in an Axiomatic Context: Some Further Considerations," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2003/30, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  • Handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2003_30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/E200330.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pieter Kop Jansen & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "The Choice of Model in the Construction of Input–Output Coefficients Matrices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 4, pages 47-66, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. ten Raa, Thijs & van der Ploeg, Rick, 1989. "A statistical approach to the problem of negatives in input-output analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 2-19, January.
    3. Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "On the Methodology of Input–Output Analysis," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 9, pages 123-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Steenge, Albert E., 1990. "The commodity technology revisited : Theoretical basis and an application to error location in the make-use framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 376-387, October.
    5. ten Raa, Thijs & Chakraborty, Debesh & Small, J Anthony, 1984. "An Alternative Treatment of Secondary Products in Input-Output Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(1), pages 88-97, February.
    6. Fukui, Yukio & Seneta, E., 1985. "A theoretical approach to the conventional treatment of joint product in input-output tables," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(2-3), pages 175-179.
    7. Joe Mattey & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in U.S. Manufacturing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 16, pages 285-305, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Joe Mattey & Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in U.S. Manufacturing," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 16, pages 285-305 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. J. Harvey Edmonston, 1952. "A Treatment of Multiple-Process Industries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(4), pages 557-571.
    10. Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "An Alternative Treatment of Secondary Products in Input–Output Analysis: Frustration," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 5, pages 67-76, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Viet, Vu Quang, 1994. "Practices in input-output table compilation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 27-54, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tukker, Arnold & Poliakov, Evgueni & Heijungs, Reinout & Hawkins, Troy & Neuwahl, Frederik & Rueda-Cantuche, José M. & Giljum, Stefan & Moll, Stephan & Oosterhaven, Jan & Bouwmeester, Maaike, 2009. "Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1928-1937, May.
    2. Rueda-Cantuche, José M. & Amores, Antonio F., 2010. "Consistent and unbiased carbon dioxide emission multipliers: Performance of Danish emission reductions via external trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 988-998, March.
    3. Tarancón, Miguel Angel & del Río, Pablo & Callejas Albiñana, Fernando, 2010. "Assessing the influence of manufacturing sectors on electricity demand. A cross-country input-output approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1900-1908, April.
    4. Julian Andres VILLAMIL & Luis Felipe QUINTERO & Gustavo Adolfo HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, 2019. "La estructura sectorial de Colombia: Un análisis insumo-producto," Archivos de Economía 017505, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
    5. José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche & Nuno Sousa & Valeria Andreoni & Iñaki Arto, 2013. "The Single Market as an Engine for Employment through External Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 931-947, September.
    6. Cansino Muñoz-Repiso, José Manuel & Cardenete Flores, M.Alejandro & Ordóñez Ríos, Manuel & Román Collado, Rocío, 2013. "Análisis de sectores clave de la economía española a partir de la Matriz de Contabilidad Social de España 2007/Key Sectors Analysis of the Spanish Economy Using a Social Accounting Matrix for 2007," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 621-654, Septiembr.
    7. T Mariolis & G Soklis, 2010. "Additive Labour Values and Prices: Evidence from the Supply and Use Tables of the French, German and Greek Economies," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 15(2), pages 87-107, September.
    8. Reinout Heijungs & Arjan Koning, 2019. "Analyzing the effects of the choice of model in the context of marginal changes in final demand," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Rodrigues, João F.D. & Rueda-Cantuche, José M., 2013. "A two-stage econometric method for the estimation of carbon multipliers with rectangular supply and use tables," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 206-212.
    10. Soklis, George, 2009. "The Conversion of the Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review," MPRA Paper 46873, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soklis, George, 2009. "The Conversion of the Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review," MPRA Paper 46873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Thijs Ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2005. "Output and Employment Input-Output Multipliers on the basis of Use and Make Matrices," ERSA conference papers ersa05p282, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Elio Londero, 1999. "Secondary Products, By-products and the Commodity Technology Assumption," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 195-203.
    4. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    5. José M. Rueda-Cantuche & Antonio Titos Moreno & Marisa Asensio Pardo, 2005. "A use-side trade margins matrix for the Andalusian economy," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2005/06, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    6. Shigemi Kagawa & Hajime Inamura & Yuichi Moriguchi, 2002. "The Invisible Multipliers of Joint-products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 185-203, June.
    7. Xesús Pereira López & Melchor Fernández Fernández & André Carrascal Incera, 2012. "Algunas consideraciones acerca de los modelos input-output rectangulares," Documentos de trabajo - Analise Economica 0049, IDEGA - Instituto Universitario de Estudios e Desenvolvemento de Galicia.
    8. Louis Mesnard, 2011. "Negatives in symmetric input–output tables: the impossible quest for the Holy Grail," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(2), pages 427-454, April.
    9. Thijs ten Raa & José M. Rueda-Cantuche, 2021. "The Problem of Negatives Generated by the Commodity Technology Model in Input-Output Analysis: A Review of the Solutions," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Efficiency and Input-Output Analyses Theory and Applications, chapter 18, pages 319-338, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Clopper Almon, 2000. "Product-to-Product Tables via Product-Technology with No Negative Flows," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 27-43.
    11. MESNARD, Louis de, 2008. "On the impossibility of calculating the product technology in the Supply-Use model," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2008-06, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    12. Brugt Kazemier & Carlo H. Driesen & Erik Hoogbruin, 2012. "From Input--Output Tables To Supply-And-Use Tables," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 319-327, December.
    13. C. Oliveira & D. Coelho & C. H. Antunes, 2016. "Coupling input–output analysis with multiobjective linear programming models for the study of economy–energy–environment–social (E3S) trade-offs: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 471-502, December.
    14. Joe P. Mattey & Steven Strongin, 1997. "Factor utilization and margins for adjusting output: evidence from manufacturing plants," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 3-17.
    15. Verbeek, M.J.C.M. & Nijman, T.E., 1993. "Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models," Other publications TiSEM 45c3a75b-eb19-456f-ba92-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Edward N. Wolff, 2011. "Spillovers, Linkages, and Productivity Growth in the US Economy, 1958 to 2007," NBER Working Papers 16864, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. de Zeeuw, A J & van der Ploeg, F, 1991. "Difference Games and Policy Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 612-636, October.
    18. van Wijnbergen, Sweder, 1992. "Trade Reform, Policy Uncertainty, and the Current Account: A Non-Expected-Utility Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 626-633, June.
    19. Sofiane Ghali & Pierre Mohnen, 2002. "Restructuring And Economic Performance: The Experience Of The Tunisian Economy," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-26, CIRANO.
    20. Steel, Mark F. J., 1991. "A Bayesian analysis of simultaneous equation models by combining recursive analytical and numerical approaches," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1-2), pages 83-117.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Input-output analysis; technical coefficients;

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2003_30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcanges.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Mérida The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Susana Mérida to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcanges.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.