IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/61247.html

Could regulator materialize potential demand for Islamic securities? Evidence from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Kariastanto, Bayu
  • Ihsanin, Aulia

Abstract

One main advantage of Islamic securities is their wider demands because Islamic securities are able to meet both demands for Islamic and conventional securities. This argument is valid if and only if the demands for Islamic securities do exist AND investors believe that Islamic securities do comply with sharia. One important regulator role in developing Islamic capital market is to ensure sharia compliance of Islamic securities and to convince investors regarding this compliance. Bapepam-LK carries out this role by publishing semiannually the list of Islamic securities (DES). Utilizing the first issuance of DES on September 2007, we employ differences in differences (DID) regression to see the immediate, medium, and long term market response to this announcement. We also estimate cumulative abnormal returns by employing the standard market model for the robustness test. We find that market reacts to sharia compliance declaration by regulator in the long-run, hence potential demands are realized and the Islamic securities will enjoy greater market power. We also provide evidence that Islamic investors are not too strict in screening Islamic securities and are willing to accept different opinions regarding sharia compliance. This finding could explain why Islamic finance is still growing rapidly even though there are critiques in the genuineness of sharia compliance of the current Islamic financial products/services.

Suggested Citation

  • Kariastanto, Bayu & Ihsanin, Aulia, 2012. "Could regulator materialize potential demand for Islamic securities? Evidence from Indonesia," MPRA Paper 61247, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:61247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61247/1/MPRA_paper_61247.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ms. Faezeh Raei & Mr. Selim Cakir, 2007. "Sukuk vs. Eurobonds: Is There a Difference in Value-at-Risk?," IMF Working Papers 2007/237, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Godlewski, Christophe J. & Turk-Ariss, Rima & Weill, Laurent, 2011. "Do markets perceive sukuk and conventional bonds as different financing instruments?," BOFIT Discussion Papers 6/2011, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    3. Laurent Weill, 2009. "Do Islamic Banks Have Greater Market Power ?," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2009-02, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    4. Stefano Dellavigna & Joshua M. Pollet, 2009. "Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(2), pages 709-749, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kariastanto, Bayu, 2013. "Small Share of the Islamic Banks in Indonesia, Supply-side Problems?," MPRA Paper 61248, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamel Boukhatem, 2021. "Sukuk Market and Economic Welfare Nexus: A Partial Equilibrium Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 142-145.
    2. repec:gei:journl:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:126-135 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Shafron, Emily, 2019. "Investor tastes: Implications for asset pricing in the public debt market," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 6-27.
    4. Jamshed Y. Uppal, Inayat Ullah Mangla, 2017. "Co-integration of Sukuk and Bond Yields - Evidence from Globally Placed Sukuk," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 4(1), pages 106-115, March.
    5. Kariastanto, Bayu, 2013. "Small Share of the Islamic Banks in Indonesia, Supply-side Problems?," MPRA Paper 61248, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Persson, Petra, 2018. "Attention manipulation and information overload," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 78-106, May.
    7. Gu, Chen & Kurov, Alexander & Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2018. "Relief Rallies after FOMC Announcements as a Resolution of Uncertainty," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Seok, Sang Ik & Cho, Hoon & Ryu, Doojin, 2020. "The information content of funds from operations and net income in real estate investment trusts," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Pirgaip, Burak & Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Karan, Mehmet Baha, 2021. "Do Sukuk provide diversification benefits to conventional bond investors? Evidence from Turkey," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Sebastian Eichfelder & Mona Lau, 2015. "Capitalization of capital gains taxes: (In)attention and turn-of-the-year returns," FEMM Working Papers 150019, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    11. Wen, Danyan & Zhang, Zihao & Nie, Jing & Cao, Yang, 2024. "Investor attention and anomalies: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    12. Yun Meng & Christos Pantzalis, 2021. "Lottery-type stocks and corporate strategies at the turn of the month," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1027-1055, April.
    13. Bertrand, Jérémie & Burietz, Aurore, 2023. "(Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 26-42.
    14. Despina Gavresi & Anastasia Litina & Christos A. Makridis, 2024. "Split personalities? Behavioral effects of temperature on financial decision‐making," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 664-689, August.
    15. Femg, Xunan & Johansson, Anders C., 2019. "News or Noise? The Information Content of Social Media in China," Stockholm School of Economics Asia Working Paper Series 2019-52, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm China Economic Research Institute.
    16. C. S. Agnes Cheng & John Daniel Eshleman, 2014. "Does the market overweight imprecise information? Evidence from customer earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1125-1151, September.
    17. Garz, Marcel & Maaß, Sabrina, 2021. "Cartels in the European Union, antitrust action, and public attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 533-547.
    18. Zhu, Hui, 2014. "Implications of limited investor attention to customer–supplier information transfers," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 405-416.
    19. Dirk E. Black & Ervin L. Black & Theodore E. Christensen & Kurt H. Gee, 2022. "Comparing Non-GAAP EPS in Earnings Announcements and Proxy Statements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1353-1377, February.
    20. Silvio Vismara, 2018. "Information Cascades among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 467-497, May.
    21. Alexander Barinov & Shawn Saeyeul Park & Çelim Yıldızhan, 2024. "Firm complexity and post-earnings announcement drift," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 527-579, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:61247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.