IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/129158.html

A Quantum Field Perspective on Income Inequality and Wealth Concentration: Entropy Dynamics, Phase Transitions, and Redistribution in a Panel of 100 Economies, 1985--2025

Author

Listed:
  • ZENAGUI, Sid Ahmed

Abstract

This paper develops and estimates a quantum field theory (QFT)-informed framework for interpreting income inequality dynamics as a manifestation of wealth field interactions, symmetry breaking, and entropy dispersion across economic space. Departing from—but building upon—the established econophysics literature on Boltzmann-Gibbs and Pareto wealth distributions, we introduce a scalar wealth field $\phi(x,t)$ governed by a Lagrangian density with a double-well potential capable of generating inequality traps as spontaneous symmetry-breaking equilibria. This theoretical extension is motivated by three empirical observations that remain incompletely explained by existing frameworks: (i)~sudden, non-gradual wealth concentration episodes; (ii)~persistent inequality traps in developing economies; and (iii)~strongly asymmetric responses of inequality to redistribution shocks. Using an unbalanced panel of 100 developed and developing economies spanning 1985--2025 (up to 4,100 country-year observations), we estimate Pareto exponents via maximum likelihood, fit Boltzmann-Gibbs temperature parameters via moment matching, and test the QFT-augmented panel quantile regression specification against conventional panel fixed-effects and GMM baselines. Driscoll--Kraay standard errors account for cross-sectional dependence and temporal autocorrelation. Our main findings are: (i) the Pareto exponent has declined from approximately 2.84 (developed economies, 1985--1994) to 1.71 (developing economies, 2015--2025), indicating intensifying fat tails in the upper wealth distribution; (ii) the QFT wealth field potential exhibits double-well structure in high-inequality economies, consistent with symmetry-breaking inequality traps; (iii) a one-unit increase in the wealth field potential is associated with a 0.288 point increase in the Gini coefficient (FE estimate), while financial openness and capital income share amplify concentration; and (iv) panel quantile regressions reveal strongly heterogeneous effects, with the wealth field potential coefficient rising monotonically from 0.211 at the10 percentile to 0.388 at the 90, implying larger field effects precisely where inequality is already highest. These findings contribute to the literature by providing a unified theoretical framework that nests Boltzmann-Gibbs, Pareto, and field-theoretic approaches as special cases, and by delivering the first large-panel empirical evaluation of wealth field dynamics across both developed and developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • ZENAGUI, Sid Ahmed, 2026. "A Quantum Field Perspective on Income Inequality and Wealth Concentration: Entropy Dynamics, Phase Transitions, and Redistribution in a Panel of 100 Economies, 1985--2025," MPRA Paper 129158, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129158/1/MPRA_paper_129158.zip
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony B. Atkinson & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2011. "Top Incomes in the Long Run of History," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 3-71, March.
    2. Drăgulescu, Adrian & Yakovenko, Victor M., 2001. "Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 213-221.
    3. Stephen P. Jenkins, 2017. "Pareto Models, Top Incomes and Recent Trends in UK Income Inequality," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(334), pages 261-289, April.
    4. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2003. "Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 1-41.
    5. Frederick Solt, 2020. "Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(3), pages 1183-1199, May.
    6. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    7. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    8. Christoph Lakner & Branko Milanovic, 2016. "Global Income Distribution: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to the Great Recession," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 203-232.
    9. Chinn, Menzie D. & Ito, Hiro, 2006. "What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 163-192, October.
    10. Xavier Gabaix, 2016. "Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 185-206, Winter.
    11. Chakrabarti,Bikas K. & Chakraborti,Anirban & Chakravarty,Satya R. & Chatterjee,Arnab, 2013. "Econophysics of Income and Wealth Distributions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107013445.
    12. Furceri, Davide & Loungani, Prakash, 2018. "The distributional effects of capital account liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 127-144.
    13. Anirban Chakraborti & Bikas K. Chakrabarti, 2000. "Statistical mechanics of money: How saving propensity affects its distribution," Papers cond-mat/0004256, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2000.
    14. Chatterjee, Arnab & K. Chakrabarti, Bikas & Manna, S.S, 2004. "Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 335(1), pages 155-163.
    15. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2001. "A Theory of Political Transitions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 938-963, September.
    16. Arnab Chatterjee & Bikas K. Chakrabarti & S. S. Manna, 2003. "Pareto Law in a Kinetic Model of Market with Random Saving Propensity," Papers cond-mat/0301289, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2004.
    17. Florence Jaumotte & Subir Lall & Chris Papageorgiou, 2013. "Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization?," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 61(2), pages 271-309, June.
    18. A. Chakraborti & B.K. Chakrabarti, 2000. "Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 17(1), pages 167-170, September.
    19. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    20. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    21. Victor M. Yakovenko & J. Barkley Rosser, 2009. "Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income," Papers 0905.1518, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Max Greenberg & H. Oliver Gao, 2024. "Twenty-five years of random asset exchange modeling," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(6), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Costas Efthimiou & Adam Wearne, 2016. "Household Income Distribution in the USA," Papers 1602.06234, arXiv.org.
    3. Ghosh, Asim & Chatterjee, Arnab & Inoue, Jun-ichi & Chakrabarti, Bikas K., 2016. "Inequality measures in kinetic exchange models of wealth distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 465-474.
    4. Borba, Jhordan Silveira & Gonçalves, Sebastian & Anteneodo, Celia, 2025. "Inequality in a model of capitalist economy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 664(C).
    5. Lu, Xiang & Wang, Xudong, 2025. "Inequality measures in wealth exchange models based on saving propensity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 680(C).
    6. Campolieti, Michele, 2018. "Heavy-tailed distributions and the distribution of wealth: Evidence from rich lists in Canada, 1999–2017," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 263-272.
    7. Chakrabarti, Anindya S., 2011. "An almost linear stochastic map related to the particle system models of social sciences," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4370-4378.
    8. Erauskin, Iñaki & Turnovsky, Stephen J., 2019. "International financial integration and income inequality in a stochastically growing economy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 55-74.
    9. D. S. Quevedo & C. J. Quimbay, 2019. "Piketty's second fundamental law of capitalism as an emergent property in a kinetic wealth-exchange model of economic growth," Papers 1903.00952, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    10. Bagatella-Flores, N. & Rodríguez-Achach, M. & Coronel-Brizio, H.F. & Hernández-Montoya, A.R., 2015. "Wealth distribution of simple exchange models coupled with extremal dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 168-175.
    11. Kohlrausch, Gustavo L. & Gonçalves, Sebastian, 2024. "Wealth distribution on a dynamic complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 652(C).
    12. Abhirama, Muhammad Abraar & Dartanto, Teguh & Purqon, Acep, 2026. "The Fermi–Dirac distribution modeling of income distribution of developing and developed countries: A comparative study of Indonesia, United States, and Singapore," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 685(C).
    13. Ignacio Ormazábal & F. A. Borotto & H. F. Astudillo, 2017. "Influence of Money Distribution on Civil Violence Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, November.
    14. Tao, Yong & Li, Hualong, 2026. "Opportunity polarization: A divided world," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 685(C).
    15. N. Bagatella-Flores & M. Rodriguez-Achach & H. F. Coronel-Brizio & A. R. Hernandez-Montoya, 2014. "Wealth distribution of simple exchange models coupled with extremal dynamics," Papers 1407.7153, arXiv.org.
    16. Anindya S. Chakrabarti, 2011. "An almost linear stochastic map related to the particle system models of social sciences," Papers 1101.3617, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2011.
    17. Boghosian, Bruce M. & Devitt-Lee, Adrian & Johnson, Merek & Li, Jie & Marcq, Jeremy A. & Wang, Hongyan, 2017. "Oligarchy as a phase transition: The effect of wealth-attained advantage in a Fokker–Planck description of asset exchange," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 476(C), pages 15-37.
    18. Onur Özdemir, 2023. "The determinants of income distribution: the role of progress in human capital," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4193-4227, October.
    19. Chakrabarti, Anindya S. & Chakrabarti, Bikas K., 2010. "Statistical theories of income and wealth distribution," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 4, pages 1-31.
    20. Brugna, Carlo & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2018. "Kinetic models for goods exchange in a multi-agent market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 362-375.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • E25 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.