IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128691.html

Innovation Policy and AI-Enabled Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert, Marc

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has moved from a specialist computational field into a general organisational, industrial and political question. It reshapes production, coordination, learning, and competition, while also unsettling the conceptual boundaries that have long separated innovation policy from business model analysis. This chapter argues that AI-enabled transformation should be understood through a combined lens that links mission-oriented innovation policy, dynamic capabilities, and business model change. The key claim is straightforward. AI does not matter only because it automates tasks or improves prediction. It matters because it reorganises how firms sense opportunities, create and distribute value, capture returns, and position themselves within wider ecosystems. At the same time, it reopens a foundational policy question about direction. If AI is treated as a neutral productivity tool, policy remains trapped within a narrow market-failure logic. If AI is treated as an infrastructural and strategic technology, policy must confront the harder issues of purpose, capability, coordination, and public value. Building on the arguments of mission-oriented innovation policy and the literature on digital transformation of business models, this chapter develops a critical review of how AI changes firms and how policy should respond. It argues for a framework in which public institutions shape directions of change, crowd in experimentation, discipline concentration, and build the collective capabilities required for broad-based adoption. The chapter concludes that effective AI transformation depends less on diffusion alone and more on the alignment between public missions, organisational capabilities, business model redesign, and democratic governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert, Marc, 2026. "Innovation Policy and AI-Enabled Transformation," MPRA Paper 128691, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128691/1/MPRA_paper_128691.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Xu, Tao Louie & Liu, Li, 2025. "Endogenous Innovation in the Tech Cold War Era," MPRA Paper 126220, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    5. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    6. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Post-Print hal-00869707, HAL.
    7. Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons And Challenges," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 497-512, April.
    8. Shepherd, Dean A. & Majchrzak, Ann, 2022. "Machines augmenting entrepreneurs: Opportunities (and threats) at the Nexus of artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    9. Nicolas Petit & David J Teece, 2021. "Innovating Big Tech firms and competition policy: favoring dynamic over static competition [Patterns of industrial innovation]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1168-1198.
    10. Foray, D. & Mowery, D.C. & Nelson, R.R., 2012. "Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1697-1702.
    11. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00869707, HAL.
    12. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    13. Ullern, Eli Fyhn & de Boer, Luitzen & Schmitt, Julia & Vildåsen, Sigurd Sagen, 2026. "Perceptions matter. Exploring dynamics of circular economy innovation processes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Li, Feng, 2020. "The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    15. Robert Kudelić & Tamara Šmaguc & Sherry Robinson, 2025. "Artificial intelligence in the service of entrepreneurial finance: knowledge structure and the foundational algorithmic paradigm," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Chen, Kaihua & Xue, Zehua & Guo, Rui & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "The holistic role of multi-level government in transformative innovation process: Theoretical framework and evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kajsa Ahlgren Ode & Céline Louche, 2022. "A business model pattern arrives... and then? A translation perspective on business model innovation in established firms," Post-Print hal-03633349, HAL.
    5. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    6. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    8. Mark Loon & Xiaohong Iris Quan, 2021. "Theorising business model innovation: An integrated literature review," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(3), pages 548-577, August.
    9. Li, Feng, 2020. "The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    10. Essén, Anna & Wennberg, Karl & Krohwinkel, Anna, 2022. "Assessing Whether Mission-Driven Innovation Makes a Difference: Mission Impossible? Developing a Guiding Framework for the Evaluation of Five Mission Driven Environments for Health in Sweden," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2022:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
    11. Oderanti, Festus Oluseyi & Li, Feng & Cubric, Marija & Shi, Xiaohui, 2021. "Business models for sustainable commercialisation of digital healthcare (eHealth) innovations for an increasingly ageing population," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Augustine Awuah Peprah & Claudio Giachetti & Marcus M. Larsen & Tazeeb S. Rajwani, 2022. "How Business Models Evolve in Weak Institutional Environments: The Case of Jumia, the Amazon.Com of Africa," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 431-463, January.
    13. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel, 2022. "Exploration of trending concepts in innovation policy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 259-292, July.
    14. Nicolas Roussignol & Lionel Garreau, 2024. "Shifting from an analytical paradigm to a systems paradigm: a fundamentally systemic approach of a business model to tackling complexity," Post-Print halshs-04579128, HAL.
    15. Gasparin, Marta & Green, William & Lilley, Simon & Quinn, Martin & Saren, Mike & Schinckus, Christophe, 2021. "Business as unusual: A business model for social innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 698-709.
    16. Run Wang & Abdella Kosa Chebo, 2021. "The Dynamics of Business Model Innovation for Technology Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Future Avenue," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    17. Göran Roos, 2014. "Business Model Innovation to Create and Capture Resource Value in Future Circular Material Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:450-468 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Djamel Fellag, 2018. "Le « Business Model » Comme Nouvel Outil D'Analyse Strategique Du Territoire," Post-Print hal-02159998, HAL.
    21. Laplane, Andrea & Mazzucato, Mariana, 2020. "Socializing the risks and rewards of public investments: Economic, policy, and legal issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(S).
    22. Dierk Bauknecht & Allan Dahl Andersen & Karoline Dunne, 2020. "Challenges for electricity network governance in Energy transitions: Insights from Norway," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20200115, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.