IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i1p431-463.html

How Business Models Evolve in Weak Institutional Environments: The Case of Jumia, the Amazon.Com of Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Augustine Awuah Peprah

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Professional Studies, LG 149 Accra, Accra, Ghana; Department of Global Business and Trade, Institute for International Business, Vienna University of Economics and Business, A-1020 Vienna, Austria)

  • Claudio Giachetti

    (Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe, 30121 Venice, Italy)

  • Marcus M. Larsen

    (Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, BI Norwegian Business School, 0484 Oslo, Norway)

  • Tazeeb S. Rajwani

    (Department of Strategy and International Business, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom)

Abstract

We advance research on the antecedents of business model design by integrating institutional and imitation theories to explore how the business model of new ventures evolves in a weak institutional environment. Based on a case study of Jumia—an online retailing company in Africa established with the aim to emulate the success of Amazon.com—we propose a process model entitled “imitate-but-modify” that explains how business models evolve through four distinct phases (i.e., clarification, legitimacy, localization, and consolidation). In essence, this model explains how new ventures surrounded by considerable uncertainty deliberately seek to learn vicariously by imitating the business model template of successful firms. However, because of significant institutional voids, the ventures’ intentional imitation is progressively replaced by experiential learning that blends business model imitation with innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Augustine Awuah Peprah & Claudio Giachetti & Marcus M. Larsen & Tazeeb S. Rajwani, 2022. "How Business Models Evolve in Weak Institutional Environments: The Case of Jumia, the Amazon.Com of Africa," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 431-463, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:431-463
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng Gao & Tiona Zuzul & Geoffrey Jones & Tarun Khanna, 2017. "Overcoming Institutional Voids: A Reputation-Based View of Long-Run Survival," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2147-2167, November.
    2. repec:hal:journl:hal-00565517 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-02312974 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Valentina A. Assenova & Olav Sorenson, 2017. "Legitimacy and the Benefits of Firm Formalization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 804-818, October.
    6. Sidney G. Winter & Gabriel Szulanski, 2001. "Replication as Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 730-743, December.
    7. Johanna Mair & Ignasi Marti & Marc Ventresca, 2012. "Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh : How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids," Post-Print hal-02276707, HAL.
    8. Anna Jonsson & Nicolai J Foss, 2011. "International expansion through flexible replication: Learning from the internationalization experience of IKEA," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(9), pages 1079-1102, December.
    9. Gautam Ahuja & Sai Yayavaram, 2011. "PERSPECTIVE ---Explaining Influence Rents: The Case for an Institutions-Based View of Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1631-1652, December.
    10. Jonathan Doh & Suzana Rodrigues & Ayse Saka-Helmhout & Mona Makhija, 2017. "International business responses to institutional voids," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(3), pages 293-307, April.
    11. Gerard George & Adam J. Bock, 2011. "The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-111, January.
    12. Claudio Giachetti & Ettore Spadafora, 2017. "Conformity or Nonconformity in Multinationality? Performance Implications for the Italian Ceramic Tile Manufacturers," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 683-715, October.
    13. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00869707, HAL.
    14. K. S. Manikandan & J. Ramachandran, 2015. "Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 598-617, April.
    15. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Ivo Welch, 1998. "Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 151-170, Summer.
    16. Klaus E. Meyer & Saul Estrin & Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Mike W. Peng, 2009. "Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 61-80, January.
    17. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    18. Xiaowei Rose Luo & Chi-Nien Chung, 2013. "Filling or Abusing the Institutional Void? Ownership and Management Control of Public Family Businesses in an Emerging Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 591-613, April.
    19. Johanna Mair & Ignasi Marti & Marc Ventresca, 2012. "Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh : How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids," Post-Print hal-02312706, HAL.
    20. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal & Rishi R. Roy, 2008. "The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 939-955, May.
    21. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2008. "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    22. Joanne E Oxley & Bernard Yeung, 2001. "E-Commerce Readiness: Institutional Environment and International Competitiveness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(4), pages 705-723, December.
    23. Benoît Demil & Xavier Lecocq & Joan E. Ricart & Christoph Zott, 2015. "Introduction to theSEJSpecial Issue on Business Models: Business Models within the Domain of Strategic Entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-01563054, HAL.
    24. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    25. Jonathan P. Doh & Thomas Lawton & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2012. "Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research : Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World," Post-Print hal-02276718, HAL.
    26. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    27. Julie Battilana & Bernard Leca & Eva Boxenbaum, 2009. "How actors change institutions : Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-00576509, HAL.
    28. Cliff, Jennifer E. & Jennings, P. Devereaux & Greenwood, Royston, 2006. "New to the game and questioning the rules: The experiences and beliefs of founders who start imitative versus innovative firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 633-663, September.
    29. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    30. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Post-Print hal-00869707, HAL.
    31. Dennis A. Gioia & James B. Thomas & Shawn M. Clark & Kumar Chittipeddi, 1994. "Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 363-383, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ameyaw, Abdul-Kadir & Panibratov, Andrei & Ameyaw, Ahmed Sadat, 2023. "Foreign divestment from emerging markets: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1134-1152.
    2. Jian Zhou & Yawei Lu & Zexin Wu & Hongyun Wang, 2025. "Optimally Distinctive Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: How Strategic Conformity and Differentiation Contribute to Entrepreneurial Firm Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3693-3710, May.
    3. Zhou, William C. & Sun, Sunny Li & Jia, Peiyi, 2025. "The subscription business model and new venture viability during a crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Balzano, Marco & Giachetti, Claudio, 2026. "Revisiting speed of imitation from a competitive dynamics perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    5. Marcus M. Larsen & Caroline T. Witte, 2023. "Informal Legacy and Exporting Among Sub-Saharan African Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 987-1003, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    2. Göran Roos, 2014. "Business Model Innovation to Create and Capture Resource Value in Future Circular Material Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Nathaniel Boso & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Dominic Essuman & Oluwaseun E. Olabode & Patience Bruce & Magnus Hultman & James Kofi Kutsoati & Ogechi Adeola, 2023. "Configuring political relationships to navigate host-country institutional complexity: Insights from Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(6), pages 1055-1089, August.
    4. Marlena Ciechan-Kujawa & Michal Buszko, 2020. "The Susceptibility of the Business Model to Changes - Empirical Analysis of Internal Determinants of Variability," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 739-757.
    5. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    6. Sarel Gronum & John Steen & Martie-Louise Verreynne, 2016. "Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(3), pages 585-605, August.
    7. Mark Loon & Xiaohong Iris Quan, 2021. "Theorising business model innovation: An integrated literature review," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(3), pages 548-577, August.
    8. Ales Novak, 2014. "Business Model Literature Overview," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 79-130.
    9. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Origins and Trends," Post-Print hal-01918188, HAL.
    10. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    11. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    12. Iheanachor, Nkemdilim & David-West, Yinka & Umukoro, Immanuel Ovemeso, 2021. "Business model innovation at the bottom of the pyramid – A case of mobile money agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 96-107.
    13. Aparajita Agarwal & Valentina A. Assenova, 2024. "Mobile Money as a Stepping Stone to Financial Inclusion: How Digital Multisided Platforms Fill Institutional Voids," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 769-787, May.
    14. Zhang, Hongfang & Xiao, Huilin & Wang, Yanling & Shareef, Mahmud A. & Akram, Muhammad Shakaib & Goraya, M. Awais Shakir, 2021. "An integration of antecedents and outcomes of business model innovation: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 803-814.
    15. Ruey-Jer “Bryan” Jean & Danchi Tan, 2019. "The Effect of Institutional Capabilities on E-Business Firms’ International Performance," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 593-616, August.
    16. Snihur, Yuliya & Lamine, Wadid & Wright, Mike, 2021. "Educating engineers to develop new business models: Exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities in technology-based firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Suzana B. Rodrigues & John Child, 2023. "The role of corporations in addressing non-market institutional voids during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of an emerging economy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 115-132, March.
    18. Candi, Marina & Kitagawa, Fumi, 2022. "Performance implications of business model centrality over technology-based firms’ life courses," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Yuan Jing, 2022. "The Relationship Between Business Model Innovation and Operational Performance of Incubator Enterprise," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 153-191.
    20. Desai, Vinit M., 2025. "Entering dangerous territory: Why corporate investment is sometimes attracted to institutional voids," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:431-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.