Author
Listed:
- Aman, Muhammad
- Ali, Amjad
- Audi, Marc
Abstract
This research investigates the potential role of Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation across various countries, utilizing data spanning from 2015 to 2024. As central banks confront the inflationary pressures intensified by the global pandemic and fluctuations in international money supply, Bitcoin has gained increased attention. Proponents of Bitcoin contend that, similar to gold and in contrast to government-issued currencies, it is decentralized and has a limited supply, which theoretically protects it from inflationary erosion. However, due to the high volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrencies, their practicality for facilitating monetary transactions remains contentious. Grounded in the positivist paradigm, this study employs ordinary least squares regression, dynamic conditional correlation-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, panel fixed effects, and quantile regression methods, using monthly data on Bitcoin returns, inflation levels, and financial benchmarks across both developed and emerging economies. Empirical findings reveal that Bitcoin returns exhibit no significant correlation with inflation, either across the full sample or within advanced economies. The evidence explains that Bitcoin's valuation responds more to variables like exchange rates, interest rates, and speculative investor behavior than to inflation itself. Comparative performance analysis indicates that Bitcoin underperforms traditional inflation hedging instruments. During inflationary episodes, assets such as gold and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities offer more reliable financial protection than Bitcoin. The study concludes that while Bitcoin does not effectively hedge against inflation, it may serve as a risk-diversification tool within portfolios under specific conditions. Due to its volatility, regulatory limitations, and weak inflation linkage, Bitcoin remains unsuitable for integration into conventional central banking frameworks. These insights offer practical implications for investors, portfolio managers, and policymakers navigating inflationary periods. Although Bitcoin may serve niche purposes, it should not be equated with traditional risk-hedging financial assets.
Suggested Citation
Aman, Muhammad & Ali, Amjad & Audi, Marc, 2025.
"Bitcoin and Inflation: A Cross-Country Assessment of Hedging Effectiveness,"
MPRA Paper
127489, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Handle:
RePEc:pra:mprapa:127489
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:127489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.