IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/123142.html

Analyzing technology aspect of India's manufacturing: The global context and future of work

Author

Listed:
  • Tandon, Anjali

Abstract

Although developed countries lead in technological advancements and adoption, nations in the Global South are not immune to their effects due to increasingly borderless interactions. The extent of transformation will depend on the economic and technological feasibility in the less developed economies suggesting the co-existence of existing technologies even though the technology frontier continues to shift upwards. Therefore, it is intriguing to understand the relative significance of the distinguished technology levels in terms of their employment base and also for different typologies (e.g. employment-intensive, export-oriented, import-dependent, etc.) of the industry. In the backdrop of the likely non-uniform technology impact across regions and countries and the likely existence of the different levels of technology, the paper has two key objectives. First, to present a balanced view of the possible challenges and opportunities from the technology transition across the regions. However, the linkage between technology (as in innovation) and employment is also influenced by the sector where the firm operates. Technology response of the sector tends to vary due to factors including the richness of technological opportunities, cumulativeness of the knowledge base, or the means to protect the economic benefits of innovation/ technology. The view motivates the second objective to classify the broad manufacturing into sectors by different technology levels, viz., high-, medium-high-, medium-low-, and low-technology, and study their relative significance in employment, value added, export, imports and output in the manufacturing segment of the Indian economy. The present paper contributes through providing a technology profile of the Indian manufacturing by classifying sectors into four categories, originally based on the R&D intensities as defined by the OECD. The technology categorization takes into account the R&D spending as a proportion of the value added and output of the industry in the ISIC Revision 3 nomenclature. By extending the classification to the more recent ISIC Revision 4 (which is also aligned to the National Industrial Classification 2008 in India), we classify each of the 69 manufacturing sectors reported in the India Input-Output database for a recently available year which are further grouped into 17 sectors for comprehensiveness while also maintaining their distinguished technology categorization, the paper uses the classification in the Indian context. The four technology categories are assessed for their relative significance in terms of supporting employment, exports, imports and output of the manufacturing sectors. Also analyzed in the paper is the sector-level labour productivity, employment intensity, export intensity and import intensity based on the technology classification. The paper concludes with a broad recommendation in view of the increasing and pervasive use of technology across different parts of the world. In the Indian context, based on the analysis of the Indian manufacturing sectors, strategic interventions are suggested for better performance of the technology sectors and to minimize the frictions between technology and jobs in the future times. Proposals for investment in workforce development activities for effective job creation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tandon, Anjali, 2024. "Analyzing technology aspect of India's manufacturing: The global context and future of work," MPRA Paper 123142, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:123142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123142/1/MPRA_paper_123142.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pankaj Vashisht, 2018. "Destruction or Polarization: Estimating the Impact of Technology on Jobs in Indian Manufacturing," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 61(2), pages 227-250, June.
    2. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "Is There Trickle-Down from Tech? Poverty, Employment, and the High-Technology Multiplier in U.S. Cities," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(5), pages 1114-1134, September.
    3. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Is it Real or a Statistical Artifact?," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2022. "From the United States to China? A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic‐telecommunications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 823-847, June.
    2. Sanjib Pohit & Sanjukta Basu, 2012. "High Technology Merchandise Exports: Where does India Stand?," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 13(2), pages 183-206, September.
    3. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Neil Lee, 2020. "Hipsters vs. Geeks? Creative workers, STEM and innovation in US cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2021, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2020.
    4. Neil Lee & Stephen Clarke, 2017. "Who gains from high-tech growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-14, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    5. Stephan Brunow & Antonia Birkeneder & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2018. "Creative and science-oriented employees and firm-level innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1808, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2018.
    6. Chandan Sharma & Rupika Khanna, 2024. "Do trade and technology foster employment growth? Evidence from Indian industries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), pages 989-1005, March.
    7. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    8. Burak Sencer Atasoy, 2021. "The determinants of export sophistication: Does digitalization matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5135-5159, October.
    9. Dahai Fu & Yanrui Wu & Yihong Tang, 2012. "Does Innovation Matter for Chinese High-Tech Exports? A Firm-Level Analysis," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 7(2), pages 218-245, June.
    10. Brunow, Stephan & Birkeneder, Antonia & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2017. "Creative and science oriented employees and firm innovation : a key for smarter cities?," IAB-Discussion Paper 201724, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Stephan Brunow & Antonia Birkeneder & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2018. "Creative and science-oriented employees and firm-level innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1808, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2018.
    12. Qiang Li & Jason F. Kovacs & Geun Hee Choi, 2021. "High-technology employment growth in China: geographic disparities in economic structure and sectoral performance," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1025-1064, November.
    13. Neil Lee & Paul Sissons, 2016. "Inclusive growth? The relationship between economic growth and poverty in British cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2317-2339, November.
    14. Tsion Berie & Sean A. Kidd & Gregor Wolbring, 2024. "Poverty (Number 1 Goal of the SDG) of Disabled People through Disability Studies and Ability Studies Lenses: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-52, July.
    15. Ioramashvili, Carolin, 2024. "Technological invention and local labour markets: evidence from France, Germany and the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Working with the Market: The Israeli Experience of Promoting R&D in the Enterprise Sector and the Lessons for Developing Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    17. Ioramashvili, Carolin, 2024. "Technological invention and local labour markets: Evidence from France, Germany and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    18. Lee, Neil & Clarke, Stephen, 2019. "Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    19. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government and Innovation Policy An Analysis of the South African Experience since 1994," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    20. Martin Borowiecki & Bernhard Dachs & Doris Hanzl-Weiss & Steffen Kinkel & Johannes Pöschl & Magdolna Sass & Thomas Christian Schmall & Robert Stehrer & Andrea Szalavetz, 2012. "Global Value Chains and the EU Industry," wiiw Research Reports 383, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:123142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.