Can China maintain high growth rates under the “dual-circulation” decoupling?

In 2020, after decades of “great international circulation” – a strategy of pursuing economic growth and development through export-oriented production – China announced that it would adopt a “dual-circulation” strategy. As was argued, “this means that, while China will continue to engage with global markets and supply chains, it will rely on domestic markets rather than external demand to drive economic growth” (Yu, 2023). What happens to the Chinese growth rates under the dual circulation strategy? Is it inevitable that the dramatic slowdown of growth that occurred since 2007 will become permanent? This paper argues that the slowdown of the Chinese growth is due not only to the objective factors (slowdown of population increase, approach to the technological frontier), but also to policy choices made well before the “dual-circulation” strategy emerged. It is due first and foremost the cessation of foreign reserve accumulation after the “Great Recession” of 2008-09 that led to the appreciation of the yuan, decline in the growth of export, investment and GDP. It is also argued that there are not only temporary costs of decoupling associated with restructuring (reorientation from foreign to domestic markets), but also permanent costs caused by the decline in international specialization and division of labor. It means that high growth rates could be maintained only at a higher price, in particular only with an even higher share of investment in GDP. Such a strategy can be justified only by security consideration, not economic ones.