IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/xrejw_v1.html

When Government Uses AI: Experimental Evidence of Selective Trust Decline and Algorithmic Nimbyism

Author

Listed:
  • Vigild, Daniel Juhász

    (ROCKWOOL Foundation)

  • Bjerre-Nielsen, Andreas

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Mortensen, Laust Hvas
  • Sekara, Vedran

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in government, changing the ways in which citizens relate to public institutions. One important aspect, the impact of AI on trust in public institutions, has been the subject of substantial efforts that document an "AI penalty" on trust in public institutions when they use AI. However, little is known about why or how such a penalty arises. In two preregistered survey experiments (N=6 084) we measure the effect of AI on trust across four real-life use cases of governmental AI. First, we find large differences across the four domains—disclosing AI usage in social services and health care settings decreases trust, while trust is unaffected for policing and unemployment use cases. Second, we experimentally test a specific mechanism (algorithmic nimbyism) that considers personal exposure to the decision-making outcomes as a driver of the negative impact of AI on trust. Despite not finding any causal evidence for the notion of algorithmic nimbyism, we used rich administrative data on survey participants’ medical history and labour force participation to explore heterogeneous treatment effects that revealed descriptive and suggestive evidence of algorithmic nimbyism. Future work could consider further exploring the combination of experimental and observational data to empirically examine explanations of the impact AI has on relations between citizens and public institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vigild, Daniel Juhász & Bjerre-Nielsen, Andreas & Mortensen, Laust Hvas & Sekara, Vedran, 2026. "When Government Uses AI: Experimental Evidence of Selective Trust Decline and Algorithmic Nimbyism," SocArXiv xrejw_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xrejw_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/xrejw_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a74708b13655e3cda91638b/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/xrejw_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mengchen Dong & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2025. "Heterogeneous preferences and asymmetric insights for AI use among welfare claimants and non-claimants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Chiara Longoni & Andrea Bonezzi & Carey K Morewedge, 2019. "Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 629-650.
    3. Pedro Robles & Daniel J. Mallinson, 2025. "Artificial intelligence technology, public trust, and effective governance," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 42(1), pages 11-28, January.
    4. Romain Cadario & Chiara Longoni & Carey K. Morewedge, 2021. "Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1636-1642, December.
    5. Christopher J. Bryan & Elizabeth Tipton & David S. Yeager, 2021. "Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 980-989, August.
    6. repec:hal:journl:hal-05277674 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Matan Rubin & Joanna Z. Li & Federico Zimmerman & Desmond C. Ong & Amit Goldenberg & Anat Perry, 2025. "Comparing the value of perceived human versus AI-generated empathy," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(11), pages 2345-2359, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Changdong, 2024. "How consumers respond to service failures caused by algorithmic mistakes: The role of algorithmic interpretability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Zehnle, Meike & Hildebrand, Christian & Valenzuela, Ana, 2025. "Not all AI is created equal: A meta-analysis revealing drivers of AI resistance across markets, methods, and time," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 729-751.
    3. Yang, Yikai & Zheng, Jiehui & Yu, Yining & Qiu, Yiling & Wang, Lei, 2024. "The role of recommendation sources and attribute framing in online product recommendations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Roshni Raveendhran & Nathanael J. Fast, 2024. "When and why consumers prefer human-free behavior tracking products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-408, September.
    5. Sreejesh, S & Singha, Souvik, 2026. "Reconciling consumer intuition and machine: Algorithmic intuition conflict and the design of Consumer–AI collaboration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Runxi Zeng & Di Zhu & Richard Evans, 2026. "When algorithms fail us: perceived algorithmic ineffectiveness, psychological reactance, and implicit personality as drivers of algorithm aversion behavior on short-form video platforms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Saheb, Tahereh, 2025. "AI in medical diagnosis: A contextualised study of patient motivations and concerns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    8. Du, Gang & Zhou, Chuanmei & Cheng, Xusen, 2026. "Reducing consumers’ resistance to AI agents in online healthcare consultations: the role of human-AI teaming from a trust transfer perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Fangyuan Chen & Yuting Pang & Lili Wang, 2026. "From Stigma to Acceptance: Ethical Implications of Anthropomorphic Design in Healthcare Chatbots," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 507-529, January.
    10. Jonathan J Rolison & Peter L T Gooding & Riccardo Russo & Kathryn E Buchanan, 2024. "Who should decide how limited healthcare resources are prioritized? Autonomous technology as a compelling alternative to humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-34, February.
    11. Erik Hermann & Gizem Yalcin Williams & Stefano Puntoni, 2024. "Deploying artificial intelligence in services to AID vulnerable consumers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1431-1451, October.
    12. Wang, Cuicui & Li, Yiyang & Fu, Weizhong & Jin, Jia, 2023. "Whether to trust chatbots: Applying the event-related approach to understand consumers’ emotional experiences in interactions with chatbots in e-commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Huang, Xiaozhi & Wu, Xitong & Cao, Xin & Wu, Jifei, 2023. "The effect of medical artificial intelligence innovation locus on consumer adoption of new products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Ting Hou & Meng Li & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Huazhong Zhao, 2024. "Physician Adoption of AI Assistant," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1639-1655, September.
    15. Li, Jian & Zhao, Jingdi & Huang, Jinsong, 2025. "Social avoidance needs boost AI's nonsocial attribute valuation in secret consumption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Hermann, Erik & Puntoni, Stefano, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Qin, Hongyi & Zhu, Yifan & Jiang, Yan & Luo, Siqi & Huang, Cui, 2024. "Examining the impact of personalization and carefulness in AI-generated health advice: Trust, adoption, and insights in online healthcare consultations experiments," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    19. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    20. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xrejw_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.