IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ax5b9_v1.html

Rising Wealth Inequality and Democratic Backsliding across U.S. States

Author

Listed:
  • Schechtl, Manuel

Abstract

Wealth inequality in the United States has reached heights not seen since World War II, renewing fears that concentrated economic power may undermine democracy. Yet empirical research linking inequality to democratic erosion remains inconclusive, in part because most studies focus on cross-country comparison, and examine income rather than wealth. This study exploits variation across fifty U.S. states—each embedded in a common federal framework but differing in political and economic dynamics—to test whether rising state‐level wealth inequality predicts democratic backsliding. I draw on two novel datasets: the State Democracy Index and the GEOWEALTH-US database. Pooled OLS models reveal a robust, negative association between state-level wealth inequality and democracy scores, and two‐way fixed effects estimates confirm that within‐state increases in wealth inequality are associated with declines in democratic performance. Interaction analyses show that growing Republican legislatures are associated with democratic backsliding where state-level wealth inequality is rising, and that extreme wealth shares (top 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%) exert the strongest influence. These findings demonstrate that subnational wealth disparities—and their convergence with partisan politics—might actively erode American democratic institutions. (Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper)

Suggested Citation

  • Schechtl, Manuel, 2025. "Rising Wealth Inequality and Democratic Backsliding across U.S. States," SocArXiv ax5b9_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ax5b9_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/ax5b9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6876ab2c8402edcc76feb3c7/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/ax5b9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua L. Kalla & David E. Broockman, 2016. "Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(3), pages 545-558, July.
    2. Grumbach, Jacob M., 2023. "Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(3), pages 967-984, August.
    3. Petrova, Maria, 2008. "Inequality and media capture," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 183-212, February.
    4. Haggard, Stephan & Kaufman, Robert R., 2012. "Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(3), pages 495-516, August.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson & Pierre Yared, 2008. "Income and Democracy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(3), pages 808-842, June.
    6. Robert Andersen, 2012. "GINI DP 47: Support for Democracy in Cross-National Perspective: The Detrimental Effect of Economic Inequality," GINI Discussion Papers 47, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    7. Frederick Solt, 2008. "Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 48-60, January.
    8. repec:cup:apsrev:v:53:y:1959:i:01:p:69-105_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. James B. Davies & Susanna Sandström & Anthony Shorrocks & Edward N. Wolff, 2011. "The Level and Distribution of Global Household Wealth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(551), pages 223-254, March.
    10. Sutirtha Bagchi & Matthew J. Fagerstrom, 2023. "Wealth inequality and democracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 89-136, October.
    11. Mark Gradstein & Branko Milanovic, 2004. "Does Libertè = Egalité? A Survey of the Empirical Links between Democracy and Inequality with Some Evidence on the Transition Economies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 515-537, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2020. "Economic downturns, inequality, and democratic improvements," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Frederick Solt, 2009. "Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 231-242, June.
    3. Vladimir Gimpelson & Daniel Treisman, 2018. "Misperceiving inequality," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 27-54, March.
    4. Frederick Solt, 2009. "Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database," LIS Working papers 496, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    5. Policardo, Laura & Sanchez Carrera, Edgar J., 2024. "Wealth inequality and economic growth: Evidence from the US and France," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Marta Guerriero, 2019. "Democracy and the Labor Share of Income: A Cross-Country Analysis," ADB Institute Series on Development Economics, in: Gary Fields & Saumik Paul (ed.), Labor Income Share in Asia, chapter 0, pages 151-176, Springer.
    7. Hyungmin Park, 2024. "Theory of developmental dictatorship," Discussion Papers 2024-10, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    8. Thomas Isbell, 2024. "Where You Sit Is Where You Stand: Perceived (In)Equality and Demand for Democracy in Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 817-836, September.
    9. Vollmer, Sebastian & Ziegler, Maria, 2009. "Political Institutions and Human Development Does Democracy Fulfill its 'Constructive' and 'Instrumental' Role?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4818, The World Bank.
    10. Paul Maarek & Michael T. Borsch, 2014. "Recessions, Inequality, and Democratization," Thema Working Papers 2014-19, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    11. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck & Jensen, Peter Sandholt, 2019. "Preaching democracy: The second Vatican council and the third wave," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 525-540.
    12. Alberto Batinti & Joan Costa‐Font & Timothy J. Hatton, 2022. "Voting Up? The Effects of Democracy and Franchise Extension on Human Stature," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 161-190, January.
    13. Byung-Deuk Woo & Jeongho Choi, 2025. "The Impacts of Justification of Income Inequality on the Confidence in the Women’s Movements: Empirical Evidence From Asia-Pacific Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    14. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Bambe, Bao We Wal & Edoh, Eyah Denise & Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Wealth inequality and carbon inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Filipe Campante & Davin Chor, 2008. "Schooling and Political Participation in a Neoclassical Framework: Theory and Evidence," CID Working Papers 178, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    16. Savoia, Antonio & Easaw, Joshy & McKay, Andrew, 2010. "Inequality, Democracy, and Institutions: A Critical Review of Recent Research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 142-154, February.
    17. Sebastian Ille & Adrian Risso & Edgar J Sanchez Carrera, 2017. "Democratization and inequality: Empirical evidence for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1098-1116, September.
    18. Martin Paldam, 2020. "A study of triggering events: When do political regimes change?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 181-199, January.
    19. Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2019. "Democratization and the Conditional Dynamics of Income Distribution," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 385-404, May.
    20. Sajad Rahimian, 2021. "The Determinants of Democracy Revisited: An Instrumental Variable Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," Papers 2103.04255, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ax5b9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.