IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/zxf5y.html

Humans vs GPTs: Bias and validity in hiring decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Lippens, Louis

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

The advent of large language models (LLMs) may reshape hiring in the labour market. This paper investigates how generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs)—i.e. OpenAI’s GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o—can aid hiring decisions. In a direct comparison between humans and GPTs on an identical hiring task, I show that GPTs tend to select candidates more liberally than humans but exhibit less ethnic bias. GPT-4 even slightly favours certain ethnic minorities. While LLMs may complement humans in hiring by making a (relatively extensive) pre-selection of job candidates, the findings suggest that they may miss-select due to a lack of contextual understanding and may reproduce pre-trained human bias at scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Lippens, Louis, 2024. "Humans vs GPTs: Bias and validity in hiring decisions," OSF Preprints zxf5y, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:zxf5y
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/zxf5y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/668da477b7d5db00eec5d9e5/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/zxf5y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Kline & Evan K Rose & Christopher R Walters, 2022. "Systemic Discrimination Among Large U.S. Employers [“Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools,”]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 137(4), pages 1963-2036.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonhomme, Stéphane & Denis, Angela, 2024. "Estimating heterogeneous effects: Applications to labor economics," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Henning Hermes & Philipp Lergetporer & Fabian Mierisch & Frauke Peter & Simon Wiederhold, 2023. "Discrimination on the Child Care Market: A Nationwide Field Experiment," Working Papers 225, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    3. Duryea, Suzanne & Millán-Quijano, Jaime & Morrison, Judith & Oviedo, Yanira, 2025. "Measuring racial bias in employment services in Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Abdulla, Kanat & Mourelatos, Evangelos, 2025. "Does war increase ethnic discrimination in the labor market? Evidence from a field experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. JoonHo Lee & Daihe Sui, 2025. "Fully Bayesian Inference for Meta-Analytic Deconvolution Using Efron’s Log-Spline Prior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-49, August.
    6. Cedric E. Dawkins, 2024. "Shared Inequity: An Alternative Frame for Racial Justice in Employment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(4), pages 825-838, September.
    7. Uditi Karna & John A. List & Andrew Simon & Haruka Uchida, 2025. "Five Facts About the First-Generation Excellence Gap," NBER Working Papers 34228, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Yulia Evsyukova & Felix Rusche & Wladislaw Mill, 2025. "LinkedOut? A Field Experiment on Discrimination in Job Network Formation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(1), pages 283-334.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:zxf5y_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Krafft, Caroline, 2025. "Do employers discriminate against married women? Evidence from a field experiment in Egypt," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. John Forth & Nikolaos Theodoropoulos & Alex Bryson, 2023. "The role of the workplace in ethnic wage differentials," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 259-290, June.
    12. Tian Xie, 2025. "Automatic Inference for Value-Added Regressions," Papers 2503.19178, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    13. Ben Grunwald & John Rappaport & Michael Berg, 2024. "Private security and public police," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 428-481, September.
    14. Valencia,Christian & Janzen,Sarah Ann & Ghorpade,Yashodhan & Abdur Rahman,Amanina Binti, 2024. "Soft Skills, Competition, and Hiring Discrimination," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10755, The World Bank.
    15. Guanyi Yang & Srinivasan Murali, 2024. "Macroeconomics of Racial Disparities: Discrimination, Labor Market, and Wealth," Papers 2412.00615, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    16. Agarwal, Vikas & Jiang, Wei & Luo, Yuchen & Zou, Hong, 2023. "The real effect of sociopolitical racial animus: Mutual fund manager performance during the AAPI Hate," CFR Working Papers 23-05, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    17. David Card & Jesse Rothstein & Moises Yi, 2025. "Re-assessing the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis," Working Papers 25-23, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    18. Grundmann, Susanna & Rockenbach, Bettina & Werner, Katharina, 2025. "First Names and Ascribed Characteristics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Dan A. Black & Lars Skipper & Jeffrey A. Smith & Jeffrey Andrew Smith, 2023. "Firm Training," CESifo Working Paper Series 10268, CESifo.
    20. Raffaella Giacomini & Sokbae Lee & Silvia Sarpietro, 2023. "Individual Shrinkage for Random Effects," Papers 2308.01596, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    21. Melo, Vitor & Rocha, Hugo Vaca Pereira & Sigaud, Liam & Warren, Patrick L. & Gaddis, S. Michael, 2024. "Understanding Discrimination in College Admissions: A Field Experiment," SocArXiv 5ctms, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:zxf5y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.